SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Ears That Nietzsche’s Zarathustra Cannot Ring: What Can Nietzsche Say about Morality to 21st Century Human?

Nietzsche’nin Zerdüşt’ünün Çınlayamadığı Kulaklar: Nietzsche 21. Yüzyıl İnsanına Ahlak Üzerine Ne Söyleyebilir?

ENGİN YURT
NURTEN KİRİŞ YILMAZ
Pages
171–190
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And finally, it has been thought that if Nietzsche’s views on morals have any value for the 21st century and upcoming 22nd century human or not, if there’s something left to learn for this human from his cri tiques or not.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, it has been aimed to examine Nietzsche’s main cri tique towards different understandings of morals in his era.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With this criticism, it is aimed to integrally understand the opinions -which are articulated directly or metaphorically- towards morals which have been encountered.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And finally, it has been thought that if Nietzsche’s views on morals have any value for the 21st century and upcoming 22nd century human or not, if there’s something left to learn for this human from his cri tiques or not.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this article, it has been aimed to examine Nietzsche’s main cri tique towards different understandings of morals in his era. With this criticism, it is aimed to integrally understand the opinions -which are articulated directly or metaphorically- towards morals which have been encountered. In here, while keeping in mind the difference between the concepts of immoralism and amor alism, Nietzsche’s views are interpreted. Being parallel to that aim mentioned above, it has been investigated if there is a thinking in Nietzsche which can be seen as a kind of understanding of morals (maybe as the understanding of mor als without morals) or not. And finally, it has been thought that if Nietzsche’s views on morals have any value for the 21st century and upcoming 22nd century human or not, if there’s something left to learn for this human from his cri tiques or not.

Özet

Bu makalede yapılması amaçlanan şey Nietzsche’nin kendi dönemindeki farklı ahlak anlayışlarına dair temel eleştirisini incelemektir. Bu eleştiri ile bir likte, karşılaşılan ahlaka dair doğrudan ya da metaforik olarak ifade edilen gö rüşlerin bütünlükçü bir şekilde anlaşılması amaçlanmıştır. Burada immoralizm ve amoralizm kavramları arasındaki fark akılda tutularak Nietzsche’nin görüşleri yorumlanmıştır. Bu bahsedilen amaca paralel olarak Nietzsche’de bir tür ah lak anlayışı (ahlakın olmadığı bir ahlak anlayışı olarak belki de) olarak görülebilecek bir düşünmenin mevcut olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. En son olarak da Nietzsche’nin ahlak üzerine görüşlerinin 21. yüzyıl ve gelmekte olan 22. yüzyıl insanı için bir değeri olup olmadığı, bu insan için geriye onun bu eleştirilerinden öğrenilecek bir şey kalıp kalmadığı düşünülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURT, E., YILMAZ, N. K. (2018). Ears That Nietzsche’s Zarathustra Cannot Ring: What Can Nietzsche Say about Morality to 21st Century Human?. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 171–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/148148

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Solomon, R. C. (2003). Living with Nietzsche: What the Great “Immoralist” Has to Teach Us. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Nietzsche, F. (2015). Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality. (Trans. R. J. Hollingdale). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Nietzsche, F. (2008). Gay Science: With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs. (Trans. J. Nauckhoff & A. Del Caro). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Nietzsche, F. (2007d). The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings. (Trans. R. Speirs). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Nietzsche, F. (2007c). The Anti-Christ. Ecce Homo. Twilight of the Idols, and Other Writings. (Trans. J. Norman). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Nietzsche, F. (2007b). On the Geneology of Morality. (Trans. C. Diethe). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Nietzsche, F. (2007a). Ecce Homo: How to Become What You Are. (Trans. D. Large). New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Nietzsche, F. (2006). Thus Spoke Zarahustra: A Book for All and None. (Trans. A. Del Caro). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Nietzsche, F. (2005).
  10. Human, All Too Human. (Trans. R. J. Hollingdale). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Nietzsche, F. (2002). Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. (Trans. J. Norman). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Nietzsche, F. (1968). Will to Power. (Trans. W. Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale). New York: Random House Inc. Nietzsche, F. (1899). The Case of Wagner, Nietzsche Contra Wagner, The Twilight of the Idols, The Antichrist. (Trans. T. Common). London: T. Fisher Unwin. Nabais, N. (2006). Nietzsche and the Metaphysics of the Tragic. (Çev. M. Earl). New York: Continuum. May, S. (2002). Nietzsche’s Ethics and his War on ‘Morality’. New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. Leiter, B. (2015). Nietzsche on Morality. New York: Routledge. Köse, D. (2008). Nietzsche Felsefesi: Modernizm, Ahlak ve İmmoralizm. YL Tezi. Ankara:
  14. Gazi Üniversitesi SBE. Hoy, D. C. (1994).
  15. Nietzsche, Hume, and the Genealogical Method. Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals. (Ed. R. Schacht). Berkeley: University of California Press, 251-268.
  16. Guay, R. (2007). How To Be An Immoralist. Nietzsche and Ethics. (Ed. G. von Tevenar). Bern: Peter Lang, AG, 55-88.
  17. Foot, P. (2003). Nietzsche’s Immoralism. Nietzsche: Critical Assesments 3: On Morality and the Order of Rank. (Eds. D. W. Conway & P. S. Groff). London: Routledge, 49-60.
  18. Foot, P. (2002). Moral Dilemmas: And Other Topics i