SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ELT Research Journal / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 1

AI IN ELT MATERIALS DESIGN A NEEDS ANALYSIS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTORS

Hilal Yıldız(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, YABANCI DİLLER YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0001-8706-3546
Asuman Aşık(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GAZİ EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-3293-1283
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-08
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings suggest that meaningful AI integration in university language programs requires not only the development of individual competencies but also institutional investment in infrastructure, ethical guidelines, and professional communities of practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines in-service English language instructors’ materials design practices, their evaluations of AI tools, and their professional development needs related to AI integration in higher education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Adopting a qualitative needs analysis design and informed by the Intelligent TPACK (I-TPACK) framework, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 14 university-level English instructors at state and foundation universities in Türkiye.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings suggest that meaningful AI integration in university language programs requires not only the development of individual competencies but also institutional investment in infrastructure, ethical guidelines, and professional communities of practice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:AI integration · English language teaching · materials design

Abstract

This study examines in-service English language instructors’ materials design practices, their evaluations of AI tools, and their professional development needs related to AI integration in higher education. Adopting a qualitative needs analysis design and informed by the Intelligent TPACK (I-TPACK) framework, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 14 university-level English instructors at state and foundation universities in Türkiye. Thematic analysis revealed that instructors engage with AI primarily as a pragmatic response to structural pressures—such as heavy workloads, learner diversity, and limited resources—rather than as part of a pedagogically grounded framework. While participants valued AI for its capacity to save time and overcome creative blocks, they also expressed concerns regarding reliability, ethical implications, and access barriers, which they navigated largely without institutional support. Regarding professional development, instructors rejected one-off seminars in favor of sustained, hands-on, and collaboratively structured support. The findings suggest that meaningful AI integration in university language programs requires not only the development of individual competencies but also institutional investment in infrastructure, ethical guidelines, and professional communities of practice.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldız, H., Aşık, A. (2026). AI IN ELT MATERIALS DESIGN A NEEDS ANALYSIS OF TURKISH UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTORS. ELT Research Journal, Volume: 15 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.71362/eltrj.1955068

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Aljemely, Y. (2024, October). Challenges and best practices in training teachers to utilize artificial intelligence: a systematic review. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1470853). Frontiers Media SA.
  2. Almegren, A., Almegren, R. M., Hazaea, A. N., Mahdi, H. S., & Mohammed Ali, J. K. (2025). AI powered ELT: Instructors' transformative roles and opportunities. Plos one, 20(5), e0324910.
  3. Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L. A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers' digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 19(1), 8.
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  5. Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge.
  6. Cogo, A., Patsko, L., & Szoke, J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and ELT. ELT Journal, 78(4), 373-377.
  7. Çelik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616-630.
  8. Çelik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers' professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  10. Daskalaki, E., Psaroudaki, K., & Fragopoulou, P. (2024). Navigating the future of education: educators' insights on ai integration and challenges in Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Ireland and Armenia. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15686.
  11. Florentino, B., Sestito, C., Cruz, W., de Carvalho, A., & Bonidia, R. (2025). Artificial Intelligence for All? Brazilian Teachers on Ethics, Equity, and the Everyday Challenges of AI in Education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.23834. Hockly, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in English language teaching: The good, the bad and the ugly. Relc Journal, 54(2), 445-451.
  12. Hossain, Z., Çelik, Ö., & Hınız, G. (2025). Exploring EFL students' AI literacy in academic writing: Insights into familiarity, knowledge and ethical perceptions. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, 18(1), 157-181.
  13. Karimi, H., & Khawaja, S. (2025). Exploring digital competence among higher education teachers: A systematic review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(1), 298-314.
  14. Kesen Mutlu, A. (2025). Unveiling Turkish EFL Teachers' Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Literacy: Voices from Low-Resource Contexts. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 1-14.
  15. Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teacher's perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 755914. doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
  16. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.
  17. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). Exploring generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors: A case study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100156.
  18. Köroğlu, A., & Kana, F. (2025). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının dil öğretiminde yapay zekâ kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(45), 1-37.
  19. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
  20. Mabuan, R. A. (2024). ChatGPT and ELT: Exploring Teachers' Voices. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(1), 128-153.
  21. Mardhiyya, Q. A., Saptaningtyas, A. R., Syifa, S. K. M., & Lestari, V. L. (2025). The Perception of Teachers on the Integration of AI in English Language Teaching. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(2), 8169-8185.
  22. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
  23. Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education: The perceptions of teacher educators. System, 122, 103290.
  24. Nguyen, T. C. (2023). University teachers' perceptions of using ChatGPT in language teaching and assessment. In Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 116-128).
  25. Nguyen, L. T. H., Dinh, H., Dao, T. B. N., & Tran, N. G. (2025). Teachers' Perceptions and Students' Strategies in Using AI-Mediated Informal Digital Learning for Career ESL Writing. Education Sciences, 15(10), 1414.
  26. Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135-153.
  27. Riggs, V. (2025). Teachers' Perceptions and Readiness for AI Integration in Under-Resourced K-12 Classrooms. Journal of Research Initiatives, 9(1), 1.
  28. Sayici, S., & Aydın, S. (2025). Using artificial intelligence in foreign language teaching: Teachers’ perspectives. Proceedings of The World Conference on Education and Teaching, 4(1), 1–10.
  29. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
  30. Schmidt, T., & Strasser, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence in foreign language learning and teaching: a CALL for intelligent practice. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 33(1), 165-184.
  31. Sharadgah, T. A., & Sa'di, R. A. (2022). A systematic review of research on the use of artificial intelligence in English language teaching and learning (2015-2021): What are the current effects? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21.
  32. Sperling, K., Stenberg, C. J., McGrath, C., Åkerfeldt, A., Heintz, F., & Stenliden, L. (2024). In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100169.
  33. Stockwell, G., & Wang, Y. (2025). Framing human-AI collaboration in language education. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 7(4), 103824. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v7n4.103824
  34. Strasser, T. (2023). ELT in the digital age. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 48(1), 121-136.
  35. Tan, X., Cheng, G., & Ling, M. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100355.
  36. Türközü, T., & Dinçer, S. (2025). Investigation of teachers' instructional material development literacy in terms of knowledge and perception. Discover Education, 4(1), 339.
  37. Trust, J., Whalen, J., & Mouza, C. (2023). ChatGPT: Challenges, opportunities, and implications for teacher education.Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 1-23.
  38. Yim, I. H. Y., & Wegerif, R. (2024). Teachers' perceptions, attitudes, and acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) educational learning tools: An exploratory study on AI literacy for young students. Future in Educational Research, 2(4), 318-345.
  39. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 16(1), 39.