Journals / Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics / 2026 / Sayı: 44

Real Convergence without “Catching Down”: Türkiye’s Alignment with Core and Expanded BRICS Economies

Pages
275–288
Publication Date
2026-07-03
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Both β- and σ-convergence tests results show clear evidence of alignment in growth dynamics between Turkey and BRICS member states.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the last two decades, major emerging economy blocs, such as BRICS, have gained importance as alternative poles of global growth and economic coordination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, an economically comparable and globally integrated country, Turkey, remains institutionally positioned outside formal bloc membership.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Both β- and σ-convergence tests results show clear evidence of alignment in growth dynamics between Turkey and BRICS member states.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Economic · Convergence · BRICS

Abstract

In the last two decades, major emerging economy blocs, such as BRICS, have gained importance as alternative poles of global growth and economic coordination. However, an economically comparable and globally integrated country, Turkey, remains institutionally positioned outside formal bloc membership. Despite the inexistence of formal entry rules, the members share some similarities. Therefore, this study examines whether Turkey’s income dynamics align with those of BRICS economies and, importantly, what form such convergence takes. By using the purchasing power parity adjusted GDP per capita data from 2005 to 2024 for Turkey, from core and newly admitted BRICS member states, this paper investigates both β- and σ-convergence and examines the relative income gap. This allows distinguishing between convergence in growth paths and convergence in income level and helps interpretation of convergence beyond standard catching-up, which is clearly not the case in the Turkish economy. Both β- and σ-convergence tests results show clear evidence of alignment in growth dynamics between Turkey and BRICS member states. On the other hand, relative income gap tests show no evidence of “catching down”: Turkey’s per capita income remains persistently above the BRICS average throughout the sample period. This finding differs from conventional convergence interpretations and points to a case of convergence from above, where growth trajectories converge despite persistent income gaps. By separating growth convergence from income-level convergence, the study demonstrates that Turkey’s alignment with BRICS reflects economic compatibility rather than income convergence. More broadly, the findings suggest that Turkey’s exclusion from BRICS cannot be explained on economic grounds alone, highlighting the role of institutional design and political-economy considerations in bloc formation.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öncü, İ. N. (2026). Real Convergence without “Catching Down”: Türkiye’s Alignment with Core and Expanded BRICS Economies. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Sayı: 44, 275–288. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2026.44.1848997

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Armijo, L.E. and Roberts, C. (2014) ‘The emerging powers and global governance: Why the BRICS matter’, International Affairs, 90(3), pp. 503–521. google scholar
  2. Bai, J., Ng, S. and Wang, T. (2016) ‘Convergence in income levels: Evidence from panel data’, Journal of Econometrics, 191(1), pp. 10–27. google scholar
  3. Barro, R.J. & Sala-i-Martin, X., (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Journal of Political Economy, 99(2), pp.223–251. google scholar
  4. Barro, R.J. and Sala-i-Martin, X., (1992) ‘Convergence’, Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), pp. 223–251. google scholar
  5. Barro, R.J. & Sala-i-Martin, X., (1995). Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill. google scholar
  6. Barro, R.J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004) Economic Growth. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. google scholar
  7. Dobrinsky, R., (2014). Economic convergence and structural change: The role of transition and EU accession. wiiwResearch Reports. google scholar
  8. Durlauf, S.N., Johnson, P.A. and Temple, J.R.W. (2005) ‘Growth econometrics’, in Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. (eds) Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 555–677. google scholar
  9. Furceri, D., 2005. β and σ-convergence: A mathematical relation of causality. Economics Letters, 89(2), pp.212–215. google scholar
  10. Islam, N. (1995) ‘Growth empirics: A panel data approach’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), pp. 1127–1170. google scholar
  11. Johnson, P. and Papageorgiou, C. (2020) ‘What remains of cross-country convergence?’, Journal of Economic Literature, 58(1), pp. 129–175. google scholar
  12. Kremer, M., Onatski, A. and Stock, J.H. (2001) ‘Searching for prosperity’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 55, pp. 275–303. google scholar
  13. Navarro-Chávez, C.L., (2025). Economic and sectoral convergence in Latin America and the Caribbean: An analysis of beta and sigma convergence. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(2), p.61. google scholar
  14. Nchor, D., (2025). Beta and sigma convergence in West African economies. Economic Modelling. google scholar
  15. Phillips, P.C.B. and Sul, D. (2007) ‘Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests’, Econometrica, 75(6), pp. 1771–1855. google scholar
  16. Pukin-Sowul, P. & Włodarczyk, B., (2024). Beta and sigma economic convergence of Central and Eastern European countries to the EU-12. Journal of Economic Studies. google scholar
  17. Quah, D. (1993) ‘Galton’s fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95(4), pp.427–443. google scholar
  18. Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996) ‘The classical approach to convergence analysis’, Economic Journal, 106(437), pp. 1019– 1036 google scholar
  19. Young, A.T., Higgins, M.J. & Levy, D., (2008). Sigma convergence versus beta convergence. Journal of Money, Credit google scholar