SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

CIRCULATORY SHOCK AND MONITORIZATION TECHNIQUES IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

YOĞUN BAKIMDA SİRKULATUVAR ŞOK VE MONİTÖRİZASYON YÖNTEMLERİ

Meltem KİRPİ
Esra ÇALIŞKAN
Pages
215–222
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the future, hemodynamic monitoring will undoubtedly be non-invasive, can be carried in the pocket and compatible with the technological devices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Circulatory shock is defined as a life threatening acute circulatory failure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Appropriate hemodynamic monitorisation varies according to the degree, complexity of the shock, response to the initial treatment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the future, hemodynamic monitoring will undoubtedly be non-invasive, can be carried in the pocket and compatible with the technological devices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Circulatory shock is defined as a life threatening acute circulatory failure. Appropriate hemodynamic monitorisation varies according to the degree, complexity of the shock, response to the initial treatment. Bedside monitoring techniques help the clini- can evaluating hemodynamic status and response to treatment. Initial monitorization is important to determine underlying causes together with the information obtained from the clinical evaluation and phase of the shock. Advanced hemodynamic monitorizati- on is not necessary when the patients with shock respond the initial therapy is widely considered. It is difficult to determine the degree of the cardiac disfunction and appropriate choice of treatment without advanced hemodynamic evaluation when initial the- rapy is not appropriate or in complex cases and measuring cardiac output is indicated. In recent years hemodynamic monitoriza- tion techniques have evolved markedly from invasive to minimal/noninvasive, intermittant to continuous and real time hemodyna- mic variable measurement. In the future, hemodynamic monitoring will undoubtedly be non-invasive, can be carried in the pocket and compatible with the technological devices.

Özet

Sirkülatuvar flok hayat› tehdit eden akut dolafl›m yetmezli¤i olarak tan›mlanmaktad›r. Uygun hemodinamik monitorizasyon flo- kun mevcut faz›na, kompleksli¤ine ve bafllang›ç tedaviye yan›t›na göre de¤iflmektedir. Yatak bafl› monitörizasyon teknikleri hemo- dinamik durumun ve tedaviye yan›t›n de¤erlendirilmesi aç›s›ndan klinisyene yard›mc›d›r. Klinik de¤erlendirmeden al›nan bilgiler ile beraber altta yatan sebeplerin aç›klanmas› ve flokun evresini belirlemede seçilecek bafllang›ç monitörizasyonu önemlidir. Bafl- lang›ç tedaviye yan›t veren fliddetli olmayan floku olan hastalarda ileri hemodinamik monitorizasyona gerek olmad›¤› görüflü yay- g›nd›r. Bafllang›ç tedaviye yan›t vermeyen/kompleks hastalar›n kardiyak disfonksiyonunun derecesini ve uygun tedavinin seçimini belirleme ileri hemodinamik de¤erlendirme olmadan zordur ve kardiyak output ölçüm endikasyonu mevcuttur. Son y›llarda hemo- dinamik monitorizasyon teknikleri belirgin flekilde invazivden minimal invaziv/noinvazive, intermittan'dan sürekli ve gerçek za- manl› hemodinamik de¤iflken ölçümüne do¤ru geliflmifltir. Gelecekte hemodinamik monitörizasyon flüphesiz non invaziv, cepte ta- fl›nabilen, teknolojik cihazlarla uyumlu olaca¤› yönündedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KİRPİ, M., ÇALIŞKAN, E. (2018). CIRCULATORY SHOCK AND MONITORIZATION TECHNIQUES IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 215–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/147578

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1726-1734.
  2. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 1795-815.
  3. Jozwiak M, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Monitoring: from cardiac output monitoring to echocardiography. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015; 21: 395-401.
  4. Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Vincent JL, et al. Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 589-597.
  5. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Eng J Med 2010; 362: 779-789.
  6. Teboul JL, Saugel B, Cecconi M, et al. Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42: 1350-1359. Abu-Zidan FM. Point-of-care ultrasound in critically ill patients: Where do we stand? J Emerg Trauma Shock 2012; 5: 70-71. Vignon P. What is new in critical care echocardiography? Crit Care 2018; 22: 40. Beraud AS, Rizk NW, Pearl RG, Liang DH, Patterson AJ. Focused transthoracic echocardiography during critical care medicine training: curriculum implementation and evaluation of proficiency. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: e179-e181. Ha YR, Toh HC. Clinically integrated multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound for undifferentiated respiratory difficulty, chest pain, or shock: a critical analytic review. J Intensive Care 2016; 4: 54. Wetterslev M, Møller-Sørensen H, Johansen RR, Perner A. Systematic review of cardiac output measurements by echocardiography vs. thermodilution: the techniques are not interchangeable. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42: 1223-1233.
  7. Charron C, Caille V, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12: 249-254.
  8. Saugel B, Vincent JL. Cardiac output monitoring: how to choose the optimal method for the individual patient. Curr Opin Crit Care 2018; 24: 165-172.
  9. Esper SA, Pinsky MR. Arterial waveform analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2014; 28: 363-380. Joshi R, de Witt B, Mosier JM. Optimizing oxygen delivery in the critically ill: the utility of lactate and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO 2 ) as a roadmap of resuscitation in shock. J Emerg Med 2014; 47: 493-500.
  10. Ekbal NJ, Dyson A, Black C, Singer M. Monitoring tissue perfusion, oxygenation, and metabolism in critically ill patients. C