Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 10

Fine-grained prediction of PM2.5 concentration based on multisource data and deep learning

Pages
1728–1737
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, this novel method may improve PM2.5 prediction, benefiting people's daily lives and influencing policies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With China's economic development, air pollution has become increasingly serious.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Studying the concentration of PM2.5, as the main component of haze, is the key to control air quality.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, this novel method may improve PM2.5 prediction, benefiting people's daily lives and influencing policies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

With China's economic development, air pollution has become increasingly serious. Studying the concentration of PM2.5, as the main component of haze, is the key to control air quality. Extent research lacks spatiotemporal correlations and full regional coverage. Therefore, a fine-grained prediction method was developed for continuous prediction of station-specific and regional PM2.5 concentrations over 24 h that comprise two parts: a site prediction model (TSRT model) and a grid prediction model. The TSRT model includes a long short-term memory-based temporal predictor that uses temporally related features as inputs, a Long Short-Term Memorybased spatial predictor that requires spatially related features as inputs, and a regression model based on regression-tree algorithm to aggregate the predictions of temporal and spatial predictors. The grid concentration prediction model based on a fully connected back-propagation neural network with grid characteristics as inputs achieved a PM2.5 regional prediction with 1-km2 non-overlapping grids across the study area. The approach was evaluated with data from 101 monitoring stations in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area. The results imply that: (1) the forecasting performance of TSRT models is better than other possible methods with average R2 = 0.9 and average MAE = 10.35 μg/m3 , (2) R2 and MAE values of the grid prediction model are 0.77 and 21.87 μg/m3 , supporting the advantages of our method over well-known interpolation models, such as kriging interpolation, and (3) the method provides appropriate PM2.5 concentration prediction in the next 24 h. Therefore, this novel method may improve PM2.5 prediction, benefiting people's daily lives and influencing policies.

🔖

Cite This Article

XU, X., TONG, T., ZHANG, J. W., MENG, L. (2020). Fine-grained prediction of PM2.5 concentration based on multisource data and deep learning. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 10, 1728–1737. https://ajindex.com/articles/147406

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Arvani, B., Pierce, R.B., et al., 2013. Implementation of IMAPP/IDEA-I over the Po valley region, Northern Italy, for air quality monitoring and forecasting. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology. https:// doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1632.1923.
  2. Askariyeh, MH, Zietsman, J, Autenrieth, R, 2020. Traffic contribution to PM2.5 increment in the near-road environment. Atmos. Environ. 224. Beckerman, B. S, M, Jerrett, et al., 2013. A Hybrid Approach to Estimating National Scale Spatiotemporal Variability of PM2.5 in the Contiguous United States. Environmental Science & Technology 47 (13), 7233–7241.
  3. Brauer, M, Hoek, G, et al., 2003. Estimating long-term average particulate air pollution concentrations: application of traffic indicators and geographic information systems. Epidemiology 14 (2), 228–239.
  4. Brook, R.D., Rajagopalan, S., et al., 2010. Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease An Update to the Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 121 (21), 2331–2378.
  5. Cordero, L., Wu, Y., et al., 2013. Assessing satellite AOD based and WRF/CMAQ output PM2.5 estimators. Proceedings of SPIE. S. O. Southern 8723. Ding, Lin, Shao, Zhenfeng, Zhang, Hanchao, Xu, Cong, Wu, Dewen, 2016. A comprehensive evaluation of urban sustainable development in China based on the topsisentropy method. Sustainability 8 (8), 746. Dominici, F., Peng, R.D., et al., 2006. Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association 295 (10), 1127–1134.
  6. Gibson, M.D., Kundu, S., et al., 2013. Dispersion model evaluation of PM2.5, NOX and SO2 from point and major line sources in Nova Scotia, Canada using AERMOD Gaussian plume air dispersion model. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 4 (2), 157–167.
  7. Giovanni, G., Federico, C., et al., 2018. Forecasting pm 10 hourly concentrations in northern italy: insights on models performance and pm 10 drivers through self-organizing maps. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 9 (6), 1204–1213.
  8. He, Q., Huang, B., 2018. Satellite-based mapping of daily high-resolution ground PM2.5 in China via space-time regression modeling. Rem. Sens. Environ. 206, 72–83.
  9. Hou, Junxiong, Qi, L.I., Zhu, Yajie, Xiao, F.E.N.G., Mao, Xi, 2017. Real-time forecasting system of pm2.5 concentration based on spark framework and random forest model. Sci. Surv. Mapp. 42 (1), 1–6.
  10. Hu, X., Waller, L.A., et al., 2014. Estimating ground-level PM2.5 conce