Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 6

Comparison of clavicular hook plate with and without coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Pages
408–413
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Hook plate fixation plus CC tape augmentation may prevent subacromial osteolysis and yield better short-term functional outcomes

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of clavicular hook plate fixation with and without coracoclavicular (CC) tape augmentation for the treatment of acute unstable AC dislocation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We treated 47 patients (31 men and 16 women; mean age: 47 years (range, 21e81)) with unstable acute AC dislocations (Rockwood IIIeV) and divided them into two groups according to the treatment modality, with hook plate fixation (hook plate group) or hook plate plus CC tape augmentation (combined group).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Hook plate fixation plus CC tape augmentation may prevent subacromial osteolysis and yield better short-term functional outcomes
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of clavicular hook plate fixation with and without coracoclavicular (CC) tape augmentation for the treatment of acute unstable AC dislocation. Methods: We treated 47 patients (31 men and 16 women; mean age: 47 years (range, 21e81)) with unstable acute AC dislocations (Rockwood IIIeV) and divided them into two groups according to the treatment modality, with hook plate fixation (hook plate group) or hook plate plus CC tape augmentation (combined group). We assessed radiologic findings, such as subacromial osteolysis and AC osteoarthritis. We also evaluated the clinical outcomes using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, as well as the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Rating Scale and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score. Results: We found that the combined group had less subacromial osteolysis upon radiography, although the CC distance was similar in both groups (119 ± 29.7% of contralateral side CC distance in hook plate group versus 119 ± 34.8% in the combined group, p ¼ 0.77). Compared with the hook plate group, the combined group had a lower VAS score (4.5 ± 2.3 in hook plate group versus 2.3 ± 1.4 in the combined group, p < 0.001), better UCLA scores (19.9 ± 4.9 in hook plate group versus 27.2 ± 4.0 in the combined group, p < 0.001) as well as better ASES scores (51.9 ± 17.8 in hook plate group versus 73.8 ± 13.1 in the combined group, p < 0.001) at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Conclusion: Hook plate fixation plus CC tape augmentation may prevent subacromial osteolysis and yield better short-term functional outcomes

🔖

Cite This Article

CHANG, H., HONG, C., SU, W., WANG, T., CHANG, C., TAİ, T. (2019). Comparison of clavicular hook plate with and without coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 6, 408–413. https://ajindex.com/articles/147385

References (13)

  1. Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Bicos J. Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(2):316e329
  2. Johansen JA, Grutter PW, McFarland EG, Petersen SA. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: indications for treatment and treatment options. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(2 Suppl):S70eS82
  3. Kuchenreuter G. Experiences in the nailing of dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint according to Bosworth. Chirurg. 1956;27(6):250e252
  4. Di Francesco A, Zoccali C, Colafarina O, Pizzoferrato R, Flamini S. The use of hook plate in type III and V acromio-clavicular Rockwood dislocations: clinical and radiological midterm results and MRI evaluation in 42 patients. Injury. 2012;43(2):147e152
  5. Kumar N, Sharma V. Hook plate fixation for acute acromioclavicular dislocations without coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a functional outcome study in military personnel. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2015;10(2):79e85
  6. Balke M, Schneider MM, Akoto R, Bathis H, Bouillon B, Banerjee M. Acute acromioclavicular joint injuries. Changes in diagnosis and therapy over the last 10 years. Unfallchirurg. 2015;118(10):851e857
  7. Arirachakaran A, Boonard M, Piyapittayanun P, et al. Post-operative outcomes and complications of suspensory loop fixation device versus hook plate in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017;18(4):293e304
  8. Eschler A, Gradl G, Gierer P, Mittlmeier T, Beck M. Hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular joint separations restores coracoclavicular distance more accurately than PDS augmentation, however presents with a high rate of acromial osteolysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(1):33e39
  9. Hoffler CE, Karas SG. Transacromial erosion of a locked subacromial hook plate: case report and review of literature. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(3): e12ee15
  10. Yoon JP, Lee BJ, Nam SJ, et al. Comparison of results between hook plate fixation and ligament reconstruction for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;7(1):97e103
  11. Charity RM, Haidar SG, Ghosh S, Tillu AB. Fixation failure of the clavicular hook plate: a report of three cases. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006;14(3):333e335
  12. Zhu YY, Cui HY, Jiang PQ, Wang JL. Complications of treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation and unstable distal clavicular fracture with clavicular hook plate. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2013;26(11):927e931
  13. Lin HY, W