Journals / Diyalog Interkulturelle Zeitschrift Für Germanistik / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

The Search of the Meaning with Edmund Husserl in Relation to the 9/11 Museum As an Indication of Recollection

Edmund Husserl İle Anımsama Göstergesi Olarak 11 Eylül Müzesi’ne Dair Anlam Arayışı

Ayşegül Aycan Solaker(CUMHURİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2669-7286
Pages
262–269
Publication Date
2018-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of the work is to  analyse the National September 11 Memorial&Museum by using Husserl's phenomenology as a method.  Thus, it is aimed to evaluate the museum, which is accepted as a memory place, with the reference to  Husserl. 

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although the dominance is a phenomenon that can be observed, it is difficult to determine its position  theoretically and precisely.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, Michel Foucault argued that dominance influences the social spaces  so that dominance with temporary configurations and discourse structures can make themselves visible  (Srubar 2009 :201).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of the work is to  analyse the National September 11 Memorial&Museum by using Husserl's phenomenology as a method.  Thus, it is aimed to evaluate the museum, which is accepted as a memory place, with the reference to  Husserl. 
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anımsama göstergesi · Edmund Husserl · İmge

Abstract

Although the dominance is a phenomenon that can be observed, it is difficult to determine its position  theoretically and precisely. However, Michel Foucault argued that dominance influences the social spaces  so that dominance with temporary configurations and discourse structures can make themselves visible  (Srubar 2009 :201). In this context, it is not wrong to say that the space is an important element to be  avoided the temporality and to resist the memory against the time.      One of the most important thinkers of the 20th century is Edmund Husserl whose ideas have  contributed to making the analysis of philosophy, sociology, and psychology. The aim of the work is to  analyse the National September 11 Memorial&Museum by using Husserl's phenomenology as a method.  Thus, it is aimed to evaluate the museum, which is accepted as a memory place, with the reference to  Husserl. 

Özet

Tahakküm, her ne kadar gözlemlenebilen bir olgu olsa da, teorik olarak yerini tam olarak belirlemek  oldukça güçtür. Fakat Michel Foucault söz konusu tahakkümün sosyal mekânlara nüfuz ettiğini ileri  sürmüş, böylelikle de geçici konfigürasyonlar ve söylem yapıları ile tahakkümün kendisini görünür  kılabildiğini belirtmiştir (Srubar 2009: 201). Bu bağlamda söz konusu geçiciliğin önüne geçilebilmesi ve  belleğin zamana direnmesi için mekânın önemli bir unsur olduğunun söylenilmesi yanlış olmaz. 

🔖

Cite This Article

Solaker, A. A. (2018). The Search of the Meaning with Edmund Husserl in Relation to the 9/11 Museum As an Indication of Recollection. Diyalog Interkulturelle Zeitschrift Für Germanistik, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 262–269. https://ajindex.com/articles/1473663

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. de Palma, Vitterio (2008): Husserls Phänomenologische Semiotik (1. Logische Untersuchung). (Hrsg. Otfried Höffe), Logische Untersuchungen, Berlin, s. 43-59.
  2. Erll, Astrid (2005): Kollektives Gedächtnis und Erinnerungskulturen, http://www.beck-shop.de/fachbuch/leseprobe/9783476018939 _Excerpt_001.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 05.12.2017).
  3. Follesdal, Dagfinn (2005): Husserl’s Notion of Neoma (Edited by Rudolf Bernet, Donn Welten and Gina Zavota), The web of meaning: language, noema, and subjectivity and intersubjectivity, https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/Edmund_Husserl_The_web_of_meaning_langua.html?id =t5uUvRxaDwMC&redir_esc=y (Erişim Tarihi: 29.04.2018).
  4. Gottdiener, Mark (2005): Postmodern Göstergeler: Maddi Kültür ve Postmodern Yaşam Biçimleri, (Çev. Hakan Gür, Arhan Nur, Erdal Cengiz), İstanbul: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
  5. Hirschmann, Kai (2001): Terrorismus in neuen Dimensionen – Hintergründe und Schlussfolgerungen,www.bpb.de/apuz/25824/terrorismus-in-neuen-dimensionen? p=all, Erişim Tarihi (25.04. 2018).
  6. Husserl, Edmund (1913): Ideen zur einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, https://zeitfuerdich.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/husserl-ideen-zuc2b4r-reinen-phaenomenologie.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 26.04.2018).
  7. Husserl, Edmund (2003): Fenomenoloji Üzerine Beş Ders, (Çev. Harun Tepe), Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları:. Kuntz, Friederika (2007): Der Weg zum Irak-Krieg Groupthink und die Entscheidungsprozesse der Bush-Regierung, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Lyons, John (1991): "Bedeutungstheorien", (Hrsg. Hugo Steger und Herbert Ernst Wiegand) Semantik- Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Berlin&New York, s. 1-23.
  8. McIntyre, Ronald&Smith David Woodruff (2005): Husserl’s Identification of Meaning and Neoma, The web of meaning: language, noema, and subjectivity and intersubjectivity,https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/Edmund_Husserl_The_web_of_meaning _langua.html?id=t5uUvRxaDwMC&redir_esc=y (Erişim Tarihi: 29.04.2018).
  9. Nabers, Dirk (2005): Allianz gegen den Terror Deutschland, Japan und die USA, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden.
  10. Nora, Pierre (2006): Hafıza Mekânları (Çev. Mehmet Emin Özcan). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi.
  11. Özer, Ahmet (2009): 11 Eylül, Bölünen Dünya, Huntington ve Çatışma, Toplum ve Demokrasi 3(5), s. 191-210.
  12. Topakkaya, Arslan (2007): E. Husserl’de Noema Ve Noesis Kavramları. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 7, s. 121-136 (http://www.flsfdergisi.com/sayi7/121-136.pdf) (Erişim tarihi: 27.04.2018)
  13. Schwarz, Monika&Chur, Jeannette (2004): Semantik: Ein Arbeitsbuch, Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
  14. Srubar, Ilja (2009): Kultur und Semantik, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag Für Sozialwissenschaften.
  15. Sukale, Michael (1988): Denken, Sprechen und Wissen: Logische Untersuchengen zu Husserl und Quine, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr Verlag.
  16. Zahavi, Dan (2014): Yönelimsellik ve Bilinç (Çev. Çağlar Koç), Kaygı Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, Sayı 22, s. 167-182.
  17. Follesdal, Dagfinn (2005): Husserl’s Notion of Neoma (Edited by Rudolf Bernet, Donn Welten and Gina Zavota), The web of meaning: language, noema, and subjectivity and intersubjectivity, https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/Edmund_Husserl_The_web_of_meaning_langua.html?id =t5uUvRxaDwMC&redir_esc=y (Erişim Tarihi: 29.04.2018).
  18. McIntyre, Ronald&Smith David Woodruff (2005): Husserl’s Identification of Meaning and Neoma, The web of meaning: language, noema, and subjectivity and intersubjectivity,https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/Edmund_Husserl_The_web_of_meaning _langua.html?id=t5uUvRxaDwMC&redir_esc=y (Erişim Tarihi: 29.04.2018).