Journals / Bezmiâlem Science / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

The Effects of Spinopelvic Parameters Such As Lumbar Lordosis and Sacral Slope Angles in the Development of Lumbar Disc Degeneration

Spinopelvik Parametrelerden Lomber Lordoz ve Sakral Slop Açılarının Lomber Dejeneratif Disk Hastalığı Oluşumuna Etkisi

Pages
23–27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In control group, there was a positive correlation (r=0.927, p<0.0001)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Spinopelvic parameters were identified and the association between sagittal spinopelvic alignment and lumbar disc diseases have been reported in several studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We retrospectively identified 140 patients suffered from back pain with/without radiculopathy between 2016-2017 in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In control group, there was a positive correlation (r=0.927, p<0.0001)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Spinopelvic parameters were identified and the association between sagittal spinopelvic alignment and lumbar disc diseases have been reported in several studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the spinopelvic parameters such as lumbar lordosis (LL) and sacral slope (SS) in normal healthy lumbar spine versus degenerative disc disease group. Methods: We retrospectively identified 140 patients suffered from back pain with/without radiculopathy between 2016-2017 in this study. Of these 70 patients had normal disc morphology and they constituted called control group, and the other 70 patients had lumbar degenerative disc disease and they constituted called disease patient group. All patients’ LL, and SS angles were measured on T2 weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging and degenerated disc levels were noted. We also recorded LL-SS ratio which was calculated by dividing of LL by SSLL divided by SS value as LL-SS ratio in both groups. We compared these parameters between two groups. Results: In disease patient group there was a positive correlation (r=0.947, p<0.0001) between the LL and SS angles. The mean LL was 45.14±11.01 and the mean SS angle was 35.91±7.67 degrees and there was weak negative correlation between degenerated disc level and SS angle (r=-0.243, p=0.042). LL-SS ratio was 1.25±0.1. In control group, there was a positive correlation (r=0.927, p<0.0001)

Özet

Amaç: Spinopelvik parametrelerin, sagital spinopelvik dizilim ve lomber disk dejenerasyonu gibi hastalıklardaki önemi birçok çalışmada gösterilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı lomber lordoz (LL) ve sakral slop (SS) gibi spinopelvik parametrelerin normal sağlıklı omurga ile dejeneratif disk hastalığına sahip gruplarda araştırılmasıdır. Yöntemler: 2016-2017 yılları arasında hastanemiz polikliniğine bel ve/veya radiküler ağrı sebebiyle başvuran 140 hastanın medikal kayıtları retrospektif olarak çıkartılmış; çekilmiş olan lomber manyetik rezonans görüntüleme bulgularına göre disk dejenerasyonu tespit edilmiş 70 hasta hasta grubu, herhangi bir disk dejenerasyonu olmayan, lomber bölge morfolojisi normal olan 70 hasta ise kontrol grubu adı altında toplanmıştır. Bu hastaların LL, SS açıları kaydedilmiş, LL’nin SS’ye bölümünden ortaya çıkan değer LL-SS oranı adı altında kaydedilmiştir. Her iki grupta bu parametreler karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Hasta grubunda LL ortalaması 45,14±11,01 derece, SS ortalaması 35,91±7,67 derece idi. LL ile SS arasında ise kuvvetli korelasyon mevcuttur (r=0,947, p<0,0001). Bununla beraber disk dejenerasyon seviyesi ile, SS açıları arasında zayıf ters korelasyon mevcuttu (r=-0,243, p=0,042). Bu gruptaki LL-SS oranı ise ortalama 1,25±0,1 idi. Kontrol grubundaki hastaların LL ortalaması 49,46±9,07 derece, SS ortalaması 38,45±6,91 derece olarak bulunmuştur. Bu grupta da LL açıları ile SS açıları arasında kuvvetli

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRCELLI, A., COVEN, İ., ŞEN, P., ORMAN, O. (2019). The Effects of Spinopelvic Parameters Such As Lumbar Lordosis and Sacral Slope Angles in the Development of Lumbar Disc Degeneration. Bezmiâlem Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 23–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/147280

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Duval-Beaupere G, Schmidt C, Cosson P. A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 1992;2:451-62.
  2. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine 1998;7:99-103.
  3. During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W, Beeker TW, Crowe A. Toward standards for posture. Postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985;10:83-7.
  4. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P. Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine 2007;16:1459-67.
  5. Endo K, Suzuki H, Tanaka H, Kang Y, Yamamoto K. Sagittal spinal alignment in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J 2010;19:435-8.
  6. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Illes T. The importance of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar disc lesions. Int Orthop 2002;26:104-8.
  7. Yang X, Kong Q, Song Y, Liu L, Zeng J, Xing R. The characteristics of spinopelvic sagittal alignment in patients with lumbar disc degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 2014;23:569-75.
  8. Aono K, Kobayashi T, Jimbo S, Atsuta Y, Matsuno T. Radiographic analysis of newly developed degenerative spondylolisthesis in a mean twelve-year prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:887- 91. Barrey C, Jund J, Perrin G, Roussouly P. Spinopelvic alignment of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery 2007;61:981-6.
  9. Arts MP, Peul WC, Koes BW, Thomeer RT; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study (SIPS) Group. Management of sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation in the Netherlands: a survey among spine surgeons. J Neurosurg Spine 2008;9:32-9.
  10. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, Gonon GP, Costanzo G, Dimnet J, et al. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine (Phila Pa) 1982;7:335-42.
  11. Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Linville DL, Blanke K. The effect of variation in arm position on sagittal spinal alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2204-9.
  12. Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, Bridwell KH. Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:211-5.
  13. Edmondston SJ, Singer KP. Thoracic spine: anatomical and biomechanical considerations for ma