SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dental and Medical Journal - Review / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Clinical Applications of Ultrasonography in Endodontics: A Comprehensive Review

Endodontide Ultrasonografinin Klinik Uygulamaları: Kapsamlı Bir Derleme

Eda Nur Filiz(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, KLİNİK BİLİMLER BÖLÜMÜ, ENDODONTİ ANABİLİM DALI)0009-0000-9160-5125
İrem Eren(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, KLİNİK BİLİMLER BÖLÜMÜ, ENDODONTİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0001-5347-8137
Hakan Eren(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, KLİNİK BİLİMLER BÖLÜMÜ, AĞIZ, DİŞ VE ÇENE RADYOLOJİSİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0001-9006-6836
Pages
164–178
Publication Date
2026-09-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, ultrasonography represents a valuable complementary tool to conventional imaging methods in selected clinical cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ultrasonography (USG) is a non-invasive diagnostic method that provides real-time imaging without the use of ionizing radiation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This technology, which has attracted increasing interest in dental applications in recent years, has demonstrated significant clinical potential in endodontics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, ultrasonography represents a valuable complementary tool to conventional imaging methods in selected clinical cases.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ultrasonografi · Endodonti · Periapikal lezyon

Abstract

Ultrasonography (USG) is a non-invasive diagnostic method that provides real-time imaging without the use of ionizing radiation. This technology, which has attracted increasing interest in dental applications in recent years, has demonstrated significant clinical potential in endodontics. In this review, the role of ultrasonography in endodontic applications is comprehensively addressed under the headings of periapical lesion diagnosis and cyst-granuloma differentiation, evaluation of root canal morphology, detection of vertical root fractures, monitoring of post-treatment healing, and assessment of soft tissue and bone. The existing literature demonstrates that ultrasonography exhibits a significant advantage in periapical lesion characterization compared to conventional periapical radiography. The use of color Doppler and power Doppler techniques in evaluating intral esional vascularization provides important information to the clinician in differentiating cysts from granulomas. However, the main factors limiting routine clinical use are dependence on cortical bone integrity, operator experience requirements, and the lack of standardized protocols. In conclusion, ultrasonography represents a valuable complementary tool to conventional imaging methods in selected clinical cases.

Özet

Ultrasonografi (USG), iyonlaştırıcı radyasyon kullanmaksızın gerçek zamanlı görüntüleme imkânı sunan non-invaziv bir tanı yöntemidir. Son yıllarda dental uygulamalarda giderek artan ilgi gören bu teknoloji, endodontide önemli klinik potansiyele sahip olduğunu kanıtlamıştır. Bu derlemede, ultrasonografinin endodontik uygulamalardaki rolü; periapikal lezyon tanısı ve kist-granülom ayrımı, kök kanal morfolojisinin değerlendirilmesi, vertikal kök kırığı tespiti, tedavi sonrası iyileşmenin izlenmesi ile yumuşak doku ve kemik değerlendirmesi başlıkları altında kapsamlı biçimde ele alınmıştır. Mevcut literatür, ultrasonografinin konvansiyonel periapikal radyografiye kıyasla periapikal lezyon karakterizasyonunda belirgin üstünlük sergilediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Renkli Doppler ve power Doppler tekniklerinin lezyon içi vaskülarizasyonu değerlendirmede kullanımı, kist-granülom ayrımında klinisyene önemli bilgi sunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, rutin klinik kullanımı kısıtlayan başlıca faktörler; kortikal kemik bütünlüğüne bağımlılık, operatör deneyimi gereksinimi ve standardize protokol eksikliği olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, ultrasonografi, seçilmiş klinik vakalarda konvansiyonel görüntüleme yöntemlerine güçlü bir tamamlayıcı araç niteliği taşımaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Filiz, E. N., Eren, İ., Eren, H. (2026). Clinical Applications of Ultrasonography in Endodontics: A Comprehensive Review. Dental and Medical Journal - Review, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 164–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/1472721

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Cotti E, Campisi G. Advanced radiographic techniques for the detection of lesions in bone. Endod Topics. 2004;7(1):52-72.
  2. Patel S, Dawood A, Mannocci F, Wilson R, Pitt Ford T. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography. Int Endod J. 2009;42(6):507-15.
  3. Cotti E, Schirru E. Present status and future directions: imaging techniques for the detection of periapical lesions. Int Endod J. 2022;55(Suppl 4): 1085–99.
  4. Raghav N, Reddy SS, Giridhar AG, Murthy S, Yashodha Devi BK, Santana N, Rakesh N, Kaushik A. Comparison of the efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography, and ultrasound in diagnosing periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Sep;110(3):379-85.
  5. Simon JH, Enciso R, Malfaz JM, Roges R, Bailey-Perry M, Patel A. Differential diagnosis of large periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomography measurements and biopsy. J Endod. 2006;32(9):833-7.
  6. Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG. Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int J Dent. 2009;2009:634567.
  7. Elbarbary M, Sgro A, Khazaei S, Goldberg M, Tenenbaum HC, Azarpazhooh A. The applications of ultrasound, and ultrasonography in dentistry: a scoping review of the literature. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(3):2299-316.
  8. Musu D, Rossi-Fedele G, Campisi G, Cotti E. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of bone lesions of the jaws: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016;122(1):e19-29.
  9. Gundappa M, Ng SY, Whaites EJ. Comparison of ultrasound, digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(5):326-33.
  10. Cotti E, Campisi G, Garau V, Puddu G. A new technique for the study of periapical bone lesions: ultrasound real time imaging. Int Endod J. 2002;35(2):148-52.
  11. Maity I, Kumari A, Shukla AK, Usha H, Naveen D. Monitoring of healing by ultrasound with color power doppler after root canal treatment of maxillary anterior teeth with periapical lesions. J Conserv Dent. 2011 Jul;14(3):252-7.
  12. Sandhu SS, Singh S, Arora S, Sandhu AK, Dhingra R. Comparative evaluation of advanced and conventional diagnostic AIDS for endodontic management of periapical lesions, an in vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jan;9(1):ZC01-4.
  13. Patil S, Alkahtani A, Bhandi S, Mashyakhy M, Alvarez M, Alroomy R, et al. Ultrasound imaging versus radiographs in differentiating periapical lesions: a systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(7):1208.
  14. Avcı F, Etöz M, Üstün Y, Arslan T. Evaluation of ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool in the management of periapical cysts and granulomas: A clinical study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2022 Jun;52(2):209-17.
  15. Rios Osorio N, Jiménez Peña O, Contreras Ibarra M, Grajales M, Fernández Grisales R. Accuracy of Ultrasound Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Inflammatory Radicular Cyst and Periapical Granuloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Operative Characteristics. Eur Endod J. 2025 Mar;10(2):104-115. doi: 10.14744/eej.2024.84755.
  16. Das S, Adhikari HD. Reliability of Ultrasonography in differentially diagnosing periapical lesions of endodontic origin in comparison with Intra-oral periapical radiography and Cone-beam computed tomography: An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24(5):445-50.
  17. Natanasabapathy V, Arul B, Mishra A, Varghese A, Padmanaban S, Elango S, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the differential diagnosis of periapical lesions of endodontic origin in comparison with histopathology - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2021;54(5):693-711.
  18. Karkle A, Slaidina A, Zolovs M, Vaskevica A, Meistere D, Bokvalde Z, Neimane L. Comparative Analysis of Examination Methods for Periapical Lesion Diagnostics: Assessing Cone-Beam Computer Tomography, Ultrasound, and Periapical Radiography. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(7):766.
  19. Eren İ, Sarıyılmaz Ö, Eren H, Deniz Y. Can ultrasonography be used to determine working length in endodontic treatment? An in vitro study. Odontology. 2024;112(2):453-9.
  20. Eren İ, Deniz Y. The usefulness of ultrasonography as a dynamic measurement system for visualizing root canal working length: an in vivo study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:801.
  21. Zou X, Liu D, Yue L, Wu M. The ability of cone-beam computerized tomography to detect vertical root fractures in endodontically treated and non-endodontically treated teeth: a report of 3 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111(6):797-801.
  22. Khasnis SA, Kidiyoor KH, Patil AB, Kenganal SB. Vertical root fractures and their management. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(2):103-10.
  23. Patel S, Brown J, Semper M, Abella F, Mannocci F. European Society of Endodontology position statement: use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2019;52(12):1675-8.
  24. Cotti E, Esposito SA, Musu D, Campisi G, Shemesh H. Ultrasound examination with color power Doppler to assess the early response of apical periodontitis to the endodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(1):131-40.