SavedAdd your journal

Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

The efect of four irrigation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris in pulpectomy of primary teeth

Dört farklı irrigasyon tekniğinin süt dişi kök kanal tedavisi sırasında apikalden taşan debris miktarına etkisi

Prof Dr Arife KAPDAN
BURAK BULDUR
Pages
13–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

EndoVac and SAF extruded less debris compared with MDA and CNI

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the amount of apically extruded debris of primary molar root canals during pulpectomy using four irrigation techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Root canals of eighty primary second molar teeth were instrumented using ProTaper Next rotary system and randomly divided into 4 experimental groups (n=20): group I –EndoVac, group II- manual dynamic agitation (MDA), group III- Self Adjusting File (SAF), and group IV- conventional needle irrigation (CNI).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:EndoVac and SAF extruded less debris compared with MDA and CNI
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the amount of apically extruded debris of primary molar root canals during pulpectomy using four irrigation techniques. Materials and Methods: Root canals of eighty primary second molar teeth were instrumented using ProTaper Next rotary system and randomly divided into 4 experimental groups (n=20): group I –EndoVac, group II- manual dynamic agitation (MDA), group III- Self Adjusting File (SAF), and group IV- conventional needle irrigation (CNI). Bidistilled water was used as irrigant and the apically extruded debris was collected and dried in preweighed Eppendof tubes. Data were analyzed statistically using the ANOVA and the Bonferroni post hoc t-test (p=0.05). Results: EndoVac and SAF extruded significantly less debris than did MDA and CNI (p 0.05). Conclusions: Within the limitations, all irrigation systems extruded debris. EndoVac and SAF extruded less debris compared with MDA and CNI

Özet

Amaç: Bu in-vitro çalışmanın amacı, dört farklı irrigasyon tekniği kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen süt dişi kök kanal tedavisi sırasında apikalden taşan debris miktarını karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Seksen insan süt ikinci molar dişlerinin kök kanalları, ProTaper Next rotary sistem kullanılarak prepare edildi ve rastgele 4 deney grubuna (n = 20) ayrıldı: grup I -EndoVac, grup II-manuel dinamik ajitasyon (MDA), grup III- Self- Adjusting File (SAF), ve grup IV- geleneksel şırınga irrigasyonu (GŞİ). İrrigasyon solüsyonu olarak bidistille su kullanıldı ve apikalden taşana debris önceden tartılmış Eppendof tüpleri içinde toplandı ve kurutuldu. İşlem öncesi ölçülen Ependorf tüplerinin ağırlığı, işlem sonrası değerinden çıkarılarak apikalden taşan debris miktarı hesaplandı. Veriler, ANOVA ve Bonferroni post hoc t-testi kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi (p=0.05). Bulgular: EndoVac ve SAF, istatiksel olarak anlamlı biçimde MDA ve GŞİ'na göre daha az debris taşımına neden olurken (p 0.05). Sonuç: Çalışmanın sınırlamaları çerçevesinde, kullanılan tüm irrigayon sistenleri apikalden debris taşımına neden oldu. EndoVac ve SAF, MDA ve GŞİ'na göre daha az debris taşımına neden oldu

🔖

Cite This Article

KAPDAN, P. D. A., BULDUR, B. (2018). The efect of four irrigation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris in pulpectomy of primary teeth. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 13–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/147208

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32: 389-398
  2. Ranly D, Garcia-Godoy F. Current and potential pulp therapies for primary and young permanent teeth. J Dent 2000; 28: 153-161
  3. Tirali RE, Bodur H, Ece G. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Sodium hypochlorite, Chlorhexidine gluconate and Octenidine Dihydrochloride in elimination of microor-ganisms within dentinal tubules of primary and permanent teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17: e517- 522
  4. Kleier DJ, Averbach RE, Mehdipour O. The sodium hypochlorite accident: experience of diplomates of the American Board of Endodontics. J Endod 2008; 34: 1346- 1350
  5. Hülsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation–literature review and case reports. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 186-193
  6. Önçağ Ö, Hoşgör M, Hilmioğlu S,. Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 423-432
  7. Ahmed H. Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. Int Endod J 2013; 46: 1011-1022
  8. Botton G, Pires C, Cadoná F,. Toxicity of irrigating solutions and pharmacological associations used in pulpectomy of primary teeth. Int Endod J 2015
  9. Klein U, Kleier DJ. Sodium hypochlorite accident in a pediatric patient. Pediatr Dent 2013; 35: 534-538
  10. Siqueira JF. Endodontic infections: concepts, paradigms, and perspectives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 281-293
  11. Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2004; 14: 417- 424
  12. Tanalp J, Güngör T. Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2014; 47: 211-221
  13. Topçuoğlu G, Topçuoğlu HS, Akpek F. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files. Int J Paediatr Dent 2015; 26: 357-363
  14. Desai P, Himel V. Comparative safety of various intracanal irrigation systems. J Endod 2009; 35: 545-549
  15. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004; 30: 559-567
  16. Nielsen BA, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod 2007; 33: 611-615
  17. Mitchell RP, Yang S-E, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of apical extr