SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Computers and Informatics / 2026 / Volume: 6 Issue: 1

Blockchain-enabled digital platforms for responsible business: building trust and traceability in global supply chains

Sathiyaraj Arunachalam(Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Deemed to be University, Chennai,)0009-0009-8148-5874
C Geetha(Sathyabama institute of science and technology)0000-0001-8008-3114
Krishnakumari S(Sathyabama institute of science and technology)0000-0003-4138-850X
Yamuna D(Sathyabama institute of science and technology)0000-0002-7539-0280
Kabitha Rj(Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology)0009-0001-2534-9976
Raja M(Sathyabama institute of science and technology)0000-0002-0451-5074
Sreedhar Palupati(Bapatla Engineering College)0000-0001-5083-8651
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Responsible digital ecosystems are the last research points of the paper focusing on blockchain governance, cross-industry standardization and integrating AI and IoT.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Global supply chains are increasingly expected to operate in an ethical, transparent, and sustainable manner.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has been found that blockchain decreases the threat of sustainability scam, enhances environmental and social governance (ESG), and confidence among stakeholders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Responsible digital ecosystems are the last research points of the paper focusing on blockchain governance, cross-industry standardization and integrating AI and IoT.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Blockchain · Digital Trust · ESG Governance

Abstract

Global supply chains are increasingly expected to operate in an ethical, transparent, and sustainable manner. However, information asymmetry, unreliable reporting, and poor visibility still pose a challenge in many existing digital infrastructures over the sourcing networks. This paper examines the application of blockchain-supported digital platforms within the enhancement of responsible-business practices through the integration of trusted, traceable and verifiable data streams into supply-chain operations. Based on the main features of blockchain technologies immutability, decentralization, concurrent validation and programmable smart contracts, the paper proceeds to develop end-to-end system of accountability utilizing emerging technologies in food safety, ethical sourcing of minerals, and sustainable apparel. It has been found that blockchain decreases the threat of sustainability scam, enhances environmental and social governance (ESG), and confidence among stakeholders. Yet challenges remain. Some blockchain designs utilize too much energy, lack of interoperability, and lack of consistent regulations prevent large-scale implementation. To overcome these anxieties, we introduce the concept of Blockchain-Enabled Responsible-Business Supply-Chain (BERB-SC), converging digital responsibility and responsible governance. Responsible digital ecosystems are the last research points of the paper focusing on blockchain governance, cross-industry standardization and integrating AI and IoT.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arunachalam, S., Geetha, C., S, K., D, Y., Rj, K., M, R., Palupati, S. (2026). Blockchain-enabled digital platforms for responsible business: building trust and traceability in global supply chains. Computers and Informatics, Volume: 6 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.62189/ci.1827239

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Khan D, Jung LT, Hashmani MA. Systematic literature review of challenges in blockchain scalability. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(20):9372. doi: 10.3390/app11209372.
  2. Nandi ML, Nandi S, Moya H, Kaynak H. Blockchain technology-enabled supply-chain systems and supply-chain performance: a resource-based view. Supply Chain Management. 2020;25(6):841–862. doi:10.1108/SCM-12-2019-0444.
  3. Dudczyk P, Dunston J, Crosby G. Blockchain technology for global supply-chain management: a survey of applications, challenges, opportunities and implications. IEEE Access. 2024;12:70065–70087. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3399759.
  4. Paliwal V, Chandra S, Sharma S. Blockchain technology for sustainable supply-chain management: a systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2020;12(18). doi: 10.3390/su12187638.
  5. Queiroz MM, Fosso Wamba S. Blockchain adoption challenges in supply-chain: an empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA. International Journal of Information Management. 2019;46:70–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.021.
  6. Saberi S, Kouhizadeh M, Sarkis J, Shen L. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply-chain management. International Journal of Production Research. 2019;57(7):2117–2135. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261.
  7. Ito S, Hasegawa S, Sato T, Fukunaka K, Nagai T, Umeda T. Investigating the application of nested NFTs on consortium blockchain for enterprise supply-chain traceability management. In: APNOMS 2025. 2025. doi: 10.23919/APNOMS67058.2025.11181346.
  8. Aldoubaee A, Hassan NH, Abdul Rahim F. A systematic review on blockchain scalability. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 2023;14(9):774–784. doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140981.
  9. Hastig GM, Sodhi MS. Blockchain for supply-chain traceability: business requirements and critical success factors. Production and Operations Management. 2020;29(4):935–954. doi:10.1111/poms.13147.
  10. Sahoo S, Kumar S, Sivarajah U, Lim WM, Westland JC, Kumar A. Blockchain for sustainable supply-chain management: trends and ways forward. Electronic Commerce Research. 2022;24(3):1563–1618. doi: 10.1007/s10660-022-09569-1.
  11. Kouhizadeh M, Saberi S, Sarkis J. Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply-chain: theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International Journal of Production Economics. 2021;231:107831. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107831.
  12. Casino F, Dasaklis TK, Patsakis C. A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: current status, classification and open issues. Telematics and Informatics. 2019;36:55–81. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006.
  13. Kamilaris A, Fonts A, Prenafeta-Boldú FX. The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply-chains. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2019;91:640–652. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.034.
  14. Sedlmeir C, Buhl HU, Fridgen G, Keller R. The energy consumption of blockchain technology: beyond myth. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2020;62(6):599–608. doi: 10.1007/s12599-020-00656-x.
  15. Beck R, Müller-Bloch C, King JL. Governance in the blockchain economy: a framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2018;19(10):1020–1034. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00518.
  16. Tian F. An agri-food supply-chain traceability system for China based on RFID and blockchain technology. Food Control. 2019;102:220–229. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.03.012.
  17. Kumar N, Kumar K, Aeron A, Verre F. Blockchain technology using supply-chain management. Telematics and Informatics Reports. 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.teler.2025.100204.
  18. Francisco K, Swanson D. The supply-chain has no clothes: technology adoption of blockchain for supply-chain transparency. Logistics. 2018;2(1):2. doi: 10.3390/logistics2010002.
  19. Yli-Huumo J, Ko D, Choi S, Park S, Smolander K. Where is current research on blockchain technology? A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0163477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163477.
  20. Varma A, Dixit N, Ray S, Kaur J. Blockchain technology for sustainable supply-chains: a comprehensive review and future prospects. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024;21(3):980–994. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.0804.
  21. Ethereum Foundation. The Merge and energy consumption [Internet]. Ethereum.org; 2022 [cited 2026 March 30]. Available from: https://ethereum.org/en/upgrades/merge/.