Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3

Classification of Presidential Systems by Political Party Structures

Siyasi Parti Sistemlerine Göre Başkanlık Rejiminin Türleri

Pages
1–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This type of coalitional presidentialism works under the influence of political polarisation, political parties' levels of fragmentations and institutionalisation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Governmental systems can be defined and classified into main and sub groups by institutional and behavioural dynamics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These dynamics, especially political party structures affect the way constitutional systems work.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This type of coalitional presidentialism works under the influence of political polarisation, political parties' levels of fragmentations and institutionalisation
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Governmental systems can be defined and classified into main and sub groups by institutional and behavioural dynamics. These dynamics, especially political party structures affect the way constitutional systems work. This paper aims to classify presidential system by using political party structures as an institutional dynamic and also taking other dynamics into account to evaluate unique features created by it. The writer divides presidential systems into three sub groups: one party, two party and pluralist systems. One party system often occurs in Africa, and helps creation of semidemocratic or autocratic patronal hyper-presidential regimes. Two party system, also known as the USA type of presidentialism, creates divided governments with high level of democracy but requires equally high levels of political talent to govern as it is difficult and complicated to administer in that divided structure. Finally multiparty presidentialism triggers minority governments or coalitions. This type of coalitional presidentialism works under the influence of political polarisation, political parties' levels of fragmentations and institutionalisation

Özet

Hükümet sistemlerini kurumsal ve davranışsal dinamiklere göre tanımlamak, sınıflandırmak ve alt gruplara ayırmak mümkündür. Bu dinamiklerden özellikle siyasi parti sistemleri ayıraç işlevi görebilecek düzeyde sistemlerin işleyişine etki etmektedirler. Makalenin konusu siyasi parti sistemlerini bir ayıraç olarak ele alarak başkanlık sistemlerini sınıflandırmak ve işleyişlerini değerlendirmektedir. Bu bakımdan başkanlık sistemleri tek partili, iki partili ve çok partili olmak üzere üç ana başlık altında değerlendirilmiştir. Bunlardan tek partili olanlar genellikle Afrika'da ortaya çıkmakta, demokrasi açısından sıkıntılı patronlu hiper-başkanlık rejimlerine dönüşmektedir. En bilinen örneği ABD'de karşımıza çıkan iki partili başkanlık rejimi ise bölünmüş hükümet yapısı yaratarak demokrasi açısından elverişli ancak yönetme kolaylığı açısından karmaşık sonuçlara yol açmaktadır. Çok partili model ise ya azınlık hükümetleri yahut "koalisyonlu başkanlık" yapıları oluşumuna neden olmakta; koalisyonlar polarizasyon, siyasi kırılma ve kurumsallaşma seviyesine göre demokratik gelişmeye el vermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

BOYUNSUZ, Ş. Ö. (2016). Classification of Presidential Systems by Political Party Structures. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3, 1–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/146830

References (13)

  1. Ackerman, B. (2000), "The New Separation of Powers", Harward Law Review, Cilt 113, Sayı 3, s. 633- 725. Albala, A. (2011), "Rethinking Coalition Governments on Presidential Systems: The Southern Cone Enlightenment", Whatever Happened to North and South, IPSA- ECPR Kongresinde sunulan makale, 17-19
  2. Şubat Sao Paulo, Brezilya. Alemán, E. ve George, T. (2011), "Political Parties and Government Coalitions in the Americas", Journal of Politics in Latin America, Cilt 3, Sayı 1, s. 3-28.
  3. Bechle, K. (2010), "Neopatrimonyalism in Latin America: Prospects and Promises of a Neglected Concept", http://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/system/files/publications /wp153_bechle.pdf (08.09.2015).
  4. Blondel, J. (1968), "Party Systems and Patterns of Government in Western Democracies", Canadian Journal of Political Science, Cilt. 1, Sayı 2, s. 180-200.
  5. Bogaards, M. (2004), "Counting Parties and Identifying Dominant Party Systems in Africa", European Journal of Political Research, Cilt 43, Sayı 2, s. 173-197.
  6. Bratton, M. ve Van de Walle, N.(1997), Democratic Experiments in Africa Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge University Press,
  7. U.K. Bruhns, H. (2012), "Weber's Patrimonyal Domination and Its Interpretations", Bach, Daniel C. ve Gazibo, Mamoudou (Eds.), Neopatrimonyalism in Africa and Beyond, Routledge, Oxon. Calabresi, S. G. (2001), "The Virtues of Presidential Government: Why Professor Ackerman Is Wrong to Prefer the German to the U.S. Constitution", Constitutional Commentary, Cilt 18, Sayı 1, s. 51-104.
  8. Carreras, M. (2012), "Party Systems in Latin America after the Third Wave: A Critical Re-assessment", Journal of Politics in Latin America, Cilt 4, Sayı 1, s. 135-153.
  9. Casar, A. M. (2002), "Executive-Legislative Relations: The Case of Mexico (1946- 1997)",
  10. Morgenstern, Scott - Nacif, Benito ( Eds.), Legislative Politics in Latin America, Cambridge University Press,
  11. West Nyack, NY. Carreras, M. (2012), "Party Systems in Latin America after the Third Wave: A Critical Re-assessment", in: Journal of Politics in Latin America, Cilt 4, Sayı 1, s. 135-153.
  12. Chaisty, P., Cheeseman, N. vePower, T. (2014), "Rethinking the 'Presidentialism Debate': Conceptualizing Coalitional Politics in Cross-Regional Prespective", Democratization, Cilt 21, Sayı 1, s.72-94.
  13. Chasquetti, D. (2001), "Democracia, Multipartidismo y Coaliciones en América Latina: Evaluando la Difícil Combinación", Tipos de Presidencialismo y Coaliciones Politicas en America Latina, Clacso, Buenos Aires. Cheibub, J