SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 5

Predatory journal preference in the field of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Turkey

Muhittin ŞENER
Cumhur Deniz DAVULCU
Mesut TAHTA
İzge GÜNAL
Pages
390–393
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Authors should pay attention regarding predatory journals not only article processing charges but also very short evaluation period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of predatory journals in Orthopedics and Traumatology and to investigate the relationship of these publications with the regulations of scientific fields made in recent years in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The journals and publishers between the years 2000e2018 were screened and websites visited one by one on the basis of the orthopedic journals and publishers list determined as predators or possible predators.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Authors should pay attention regarding predatory journals not only article processing charges but also very short evaluation period.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of predatory journals in Orthopedics and Traumatology and to investigate the relationship of these publications with the regulations of scientific fields made in recent years in Turkey. Methods: The journals and publishers between the years 2000e2018 were screened and websites visited one by one on the basis of the orthopedic journals and publishers list determined as predators or possible predators. Orthopedic publications originated from Turkey was detected in these predatory journals. Article admissions, article processing charges, editorial and referee average response times were reviewed from the websites of journals. In addition, the effect of changing associate professorship application requirements and academic incentive regulation on the preference of predatory journals was examined. Results: Between 2000 and 2018 years 1626 issues which can be reached in 282 journals were examined. 4795 articles were screened in 29 journals which have articles originated from Turkey. One hundred and six (2.21%) articles which originated from Turkey was reached in these publications. Average article processing charge was $865 ($ 0e1819). Fifty-nine of 106 (55%) articles originated from Turkey were found in only 4 journal. Journals which have articles originated from Turkey were not on the Web of Science list. The response time to the articles was between 2 and 6 weeks in these journals. After the change criteria in associate professorship in 2016, 3.32 fold increase in annual average number of publications originated from Turkey have been identified in predatory journals. After the change criteria in academic incentive regulation in 2015, 4.76 fold increase in annual average number of publications originated from Turkey have been identified in predatory journals. Conclusion: The number of articles in predatory journals is increasing all over the world. This situation also valid in the field of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Turkey. Authors should pay attention regarding predatory journals not only article processing charges but also very short evaluation period.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENER, M., DAVULCU, C. D., TAHTA, M., GÜNAL, İ. (2019). Predatory journal preference in the field of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Turkey. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 5, 390–393. https://ajindex.com/articles/146378

References (16)

  1. Rupp M, Anastasopoulou L, Wintermeyer E, Malhaan D, El Khassawna T, Heiss C. Predatory journals: a major threat in orthopaedic research. Int Orthop. 2019;43:509e517. https://doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4179-1
  2. Triggle CR, Triggle DJ. From gutenberg to open science: an unfulfilled odyssey. Drug Dev Res. 2017;78:3e23. https://doi: 10.1002/ddr.21369
  3. Piwowar H, Priem J, Lariviere V, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ. 2018;13:e4375.
  4. Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Bjork BC, Hedlund T. The devel- € opment of open access publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS One. 2011;6: e20961.
  5. Directory of Open Access Journals. https://doaj.org/Accessed 24 April 2019
  6. Beall J. Beall's list of predatory journals and publishers. http://beallslist.weebly. com/Accessed 27 February 2019
  7. Witham MD, Runcie H. Turning predator into prey-the problem of predatory journals. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2017;47:3e4. https://doi: 10.4997/JrcPe. 2017.101
  8. Priyadarshini S. India targets universities in predatory-journal crackdown. Nature. 2018;560:537e538.
  9. Akça S, Akbulut M. Türkiye’deki yagmac ı dergiler: Beall listesi üzerine bir aras¸ tırma. Bilgi Dünyası. 2018;19:255e274. https://doi: 10.15612/BD.2018.695
  10. Yan JR, Baldawi H, Lex JR, et al. Predatory publishing in orthopaedic research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:e138.
  11. The Terms and Conditions of Associate Professorship. http://www.uak.gov.tr/ temelalan/TA_Tablo10_2016A_030316.pdf Accessed 01 March 2019
  12. Academic Incentive Allowance Regulation. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/ eskiler/2015/12/20151218-4.pdf Accessed 20 February 2019
  13. Cress P. Guest Post: When Authors Get Caught in the Predatory (Illegitimate Publishing) Net. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/12/11/guest-postauthors-get-caught-predatory-illegitimate-publishing-net/?informz¼1 Accessed 10 December 2018
  14. The Terms and Conditions of Associate Professorship. http://www.uak.gov.tr/ temelalan/TA_Tablo10_2018N_181217.pdf Accessed 02 March 2019
  15. Academic Incentive Allowance Regulation. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/ eskiler/2018/06/20180627-6.pdf Accessed 22 February 2019
  16. Shen C, Bjork BC. ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med. 20