SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Central Bank Review / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

TÜRKİYE'DE GSYH BÜYÜMESİ: KAPSAYICI MI DEĞİL Mİ?JEL D63, O47, R11

GDPGROWTH IN TURKEY:INCLUSIVE OR NOT?

Temel TAŞKIN
Pages
31–64
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the regional analysis based on 2006-2011 period reflects an efficiency-equity tradeoff in Turkey's economic growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, we discover the inclusiveness of GDP growth in Turkey over the course of the last decade.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In doing so, we use a recently developed method a la Anand et al. (2013) which integrates efficiency and equity dimensions of economic growth in a single measure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the regional analysis based on 2006-2011 period reflects an efficiency-equity tradeoff in Turkey's economic growth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, we discover the inclusiveness of GDP growth in Turkey over the course of the last decade. In doing so, we use a recently developed method a la Anand et al. (2013) which integrates efficiency and equity dimensions of economic growth in a single measure. We find that Turkish GDP growth was - on average - inclusive between 2002 and 2011. We also investigate cross-region and over-time developments for the available data period, and document significant heterogeneity in inclusiveness of economic growth across these dimensions. Moreover, the regional analysis based on 2006-2011 period reflects an efficiency-equity tradeoff in Turkey's economic growth. JELD63, O47, R11

Özet

Bu çalışma Türkiye'nin son on yıldaki GSYH büyümesini "kapsayıcılık" açısından incelemektedir. Bunu yaparken Anand ve diğerlerinin (2013) geliştirmiş olduğu, büyümenin verimlilik ve dengeli dağılım özelliklerini bir arada incelemeye olanak tanıyan yeni bir ölçüm metodu kullanılmaktadır. Temel bulgular Türkiye'de büyümenin 2002-2011 dönemi için kapsayıcı olduğunu göstermektedir. Bölgesel ve dönemsel gelişmelere odaklanıldığında, büyüme performansı açısından bölgeler arasında ve alt dönemlerde hatırı sayılır farklılaşmalar dikkati çekmektedir. Ayrıca, bölgesel analiz bulguları Türkiye'nin GSYH büyümesinde bir verimlilik-dağılım ödünleşimi ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIN, T. (2014). TÜRKİYE'DE GSYH BÜYÜMESİ: KAPSAYICI MI DEĞİL Mİ?JEL D63, O47, R11. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 31–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/146326

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ali, Ifzal and H. Hwa Son. 2007. "Measuring Inclusive Growth". Asian Development Review. Vol.24. No. 1. pp.11-31.
  2. Anand, Rahul, Mishra, Saurabh and Shanaka J. Peiris.2013. "Inclusive Growth: Measurement and Determinants." IMF Working Paper No: 13/135. Banerjee, A.V. and E. Duflo. 2003. "Inequality and Growth: What Can the Data Say?". Journal of Economic Growth. 8(3). pp. 267-299.
  3. Barro, Robert J. 2000. "Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries." Journal of Economic Growth. Springer. Vol. 5. No.1. pp. 5-32.
  4. Christiaensen, Luc, Demery, Lionel and Stefano Paternostro. 2002. "Growth, Distribution and Poverty in Africa: Messages from the 1990s." World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2810. Datt, G. and M. Ravallion. 2002. "Why has Economic Growth been more Pro-Poor in Some States of India than Others?". Journal of Development Economics 68. pp. 381-400.
  5. De Mello, L. and M. A. Dutz (eds.). 2012. "Promoting Inclusive Growth: Challenges and Policies." OECD publishing. Deininger, Klaus and John Okidi. 2003. "Growth and Poverty Reduction in Uganda, 1999- 2000:
  6. Panel Data Evidence." Development Policy Review. Vol. 21. pp. 481-509.
  7. Deininger, K., and L. Squire. 1998. "New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth." Journal of Development Economics 57. pp. 259-287.
  8. Forbes, K. 2000. "A Reassessment of the Relationship between Inequality and Growth." American Economic Review 90. Goh, Chor-ching, Luo, Xubei and Nong Zhu. 2009. "Income Growth, Inequality and Poverty Reduction: A Case Study of Eight Provinces in China." China Economic Review. Vol 20(3). Ianchovichina, Elena, and S. Lundstrom Gable. 2012. "What is Inclusive Growth?" in Commodity Prices and Inclusive Growth in Low-Income Countries. ed. by Rabah Arezki, Catherine Pattillo, Marc Quintyn, and Min Zhu. International Monetary Fund. Immervoll, H. and L. Richardson. 2011. "Redistribution Policy and Inequality Reduction in OECD Countries: What Has Changed in Two Decades?." OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg5dlkhjq0x-en. No. 122. OECD Publishing. Kakwani, N. 1980. "Income Inequality and Poverty: Methods of Estimation and Policy Applications." New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Kakwani, N. and E.M. Pernia. 2000. "What is Pro-Poor Growth?". Asian Development Review. 18(1). pp. 1-16.
  10. Klasen, S. 2003. "In Search of the Holy Grail: How to Achieve Pro-Poor Growth". in B. Tungodden, N. Stern and I. Kolstad (eds.) Toward Pro-Poor Policies: Aid, Institutio