Journals / Bezmiâlem Science / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Investigation of Foot Pressure Distribution in Asymptomatic İndividuals with Mild Hallux Valgus

Asemptomatik Hafif Halluks Valguslu Bireylerde Ayak Basınç Dağılımının İncelenmesi

Pages
276–280
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: It was found that both groups have similar maximum pressure (p=0.669), mean pressure (p=0.950), heel maximum force (p=0.660), midfoot maximum force (p=0.894), metatarsal maximum force (p=0.824), contact area (p=0.695), force-time integral (0.498), pressure-time integral (p=0.769) and center of force (p=0.178).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of the present study was to investigate plantar pressure distribution during static standing in asymptomatic individuals with mild hallux valgus and to compare the results with healthy controls group.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study included a total of 25 asymptomatic individuals with hallux valgus (22 females, 3 males) between the ages of 19 and 51 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: It was found that both groups have similar maximum pressure (p=0.669), mean pressure (p=0.950), heel maximum force (p=0.660), midfoot maximum force (p=0.894), metatarsal maximum force (p=0.824), contact area (p=0.695), force-time integral (0.498), pressure-time integral (p=0.769) and center of force (p=0.178).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to investigate plantar pressure distribution during static standing in asymptomatic individuals with mild hallux valgus and to compare the results with healthy controls group. Methods: This study included a total of 25 asymptomatic individuals with hallux valgus (22 females, 3 males) between the ages of 19 and 51 years. The controls group comprised of 28 health individuals without hallux valgus (25 females, 3 males) between the ages of 20-51 years. Static plantar pressure distribution and force measurement during static standing in individuals were assessed using Tecscan MatScan System (Tekscan, Inc., South Boston, Massachusetts, USA). Results: It was found that both groups have similar maximum pressure (p=0.669), mean pressure (p=0.950), heel maximum force (p=0.660), midfoot maximum force (p=0.894), metatarsal maximum force (p=0.824), contact area (p=0.695), force-time integral (0.498), pressure-time integral (p=0.769) and center of force (p=0.178). Conclusion: The results of the present study show that asymptomatic individuals with or without mild hallux valgus have similar plantar pressure distribution. These results suggest that plantar pressure distribution do not affect the development of hallux valgus or changes of hallux position do not change plantar pressure distribution in asymptomatic individuals with mild hallux valgus.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, hafif halluks valguslu asemptomatik bireylerde statik ayakta dik duruşta plantar ayak basınç dağılımının araştırılarak sağlıklı kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırılmasıdır. Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya, 19-51 yaş aralığında 3 erkek 22 kadın olmak üzere toplam 25 asemptomatik halluks valguslu birey dahil edildi. Kontrol grubu ise 20-51 yaş aralığında 3 erkek 25 kadın olmak üzere 28 halluks valgusu olmayan bireyden oluşturuldu. Değerlendirilen bireylere ait statik ayak plantar basınç dağılımı ve kuvvet ölçümleri Tecscan MatScan Sistemleri kullanılarak değerlendirildi (Tekscan, Inc., South Boston, Massachusetts, USA). Bulgular: Tepe basınç (p=0,669), ortalama basınç (p=0,950), topuk tepe kuvvet (p=0,660), orta ayak tepe kuvvet (p=0,894), ön ayak tepe kuvvet (p=0,824), temas alanı (p=0,695), kuvvet-zaman integrali (p=0,498), basınç-zaman integrali (p=0,769) ve kuvvet merkezindeki değişikliklere (p=0,178) ait parametrelerin her iki grup için benzer olduğu bulundu. Sonuç: Elde edilen veriler, asemptomatik halluks valguslu bireyler ile halluks valgusu olmayan bireylerin ayak basınç dağılımının benzer olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu sonuçlar hafif halluks valgusa sahip asemptomatik bireylerde ayak basınç dağılımının halluks valgus gelişimine etki etmediği veya halluks pozisyonundaki değişimlerin plantar basınç dağılımını değiştirmediğini düşündürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞ, S. (2019). Investigation of Foot Pressure Distribution in Asymptomatic İndividuals with Mild Hallux Valgus. Bezmiâlem Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 276–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/146259

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Glasoe WM, Nuckley DJ, Ludewig PM. Hallux valgus and the first metatarsal arch segment: a theoretical biomechanical perspective. Phys Ther 2010;90:110-20
  2. Hagedorn TJ, Dufour AB, Riskowski JL, Hillstrom HJ, Menz HB, Casey VA, et al. Foot disorders, foot posture, and foot function: the Framingham foot study. PLoS One 2013;8:e74364
  3. Choi GW, Kim HJ, Kim TW, Lee JW, Park SB, Kim JK. Sex-related differences in outcomes after hallux valgus surgery. Yonsei Med J 2015;56:466-73
  4. Barouk LS. The effect of gastrocnemius tightness on the pathogenesis of juvenile hallux valgus: a preliminary study. Foot Ankle Clin 2014;19:807-22
  5. Xiang L, Mei Q, Fernandez J, Gu Y. Minimalist shoes running intervention can alter the plantar loading distribution and deformation of hallux valgus: A pilot study. Gait Posture 2018;65:65- 71
  6. Suzuki J, Tanaka Y, Takaoka T, Kadono K, Takakura Y. Axial radiographic evaluation in hallux valgus: evaluation of the transverse arch in the forefoot. J Orthop Sci 2004;9:446-51
  7. Lopez DL, Callejo Gonzalez L, Losa Iglesias ME Canosa JL, Sanz DR, Lobo CC, et al. Quality of Life Impact Related to Foot Health in a Sample of Older People with Hallux Valgus. Aging Dis 2016;7:45- 52
  8. Lopez DL, Fernandez JM, Iglesias ME Castro CÁ, Lobo CC, Galván JR, et al. Influence of depression in a sample of people with hallux valgus. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2016;25:574-8
  9. Orlin MN, McPoil TG. Plantar pressure assessment. Phys Ther 2000;80:399-409
  10. Ünver B, Bek N. Tabanlik kullaniminin plantar temas alanlari ve basinç dağilimina etkisi. Turk J Physiother Rehabil 2014;2:1-7
  11. Ma CZ, Zheng YP, Lee WC. Changes in gait and plantar foot loading upon using vibrotactile wearable biofeedback system in patients with stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2018;25:20-7
  12. Fang F, Wang YF, Gu MY Chen H, Wang DM, Xiao K, et al. Pedobarography - a novel screening tool for diabetic peripheral neuropathy? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17:3206-12
  13. Hida T, Okuda R, Yasuda T, Jotoku T, Shima H, Neo M. Comparison of plantar pressure distribution in patients with hallux valgus and healthy matched controls. J Orthop Sci 2017;22:1054-9
  14. Blackwood S, Gossett L. Hallux Valgus/Medial Column Instability and Their Relationship with Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction. Foot Ankle Clin 2018;23:297-313
  15. Iliou K, Paraskevas G, Kanavaros P, Gekas C, Barbouti A, Kitsoulis P. Relationship between pedographic analysis and the Manchester scale in hallux valgus. Acta Ortho