Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of in-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients

Hastane İçi Kardiyak Arrest Olgularının Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
44–50
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Reversible causes of cardiac arrest should be pre-determined and in the evaluation of critical evaluation of patients emergency intervention team should be notified.before development of cardiac arrest.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Cardiac arrest is a suddenly developed unexpected clinical condition characterized with cessation of cardiac functions or inability to palpate pulsations in major arteries; loss of respiratory functions and consciousness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All data were evaluated in SPSS 15.0 statistical program using appropriate tests and p<0.05 is accepted as the level of statistical significance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Reversible causes of cardiac arrest should be pre-determined and in the evaluation of critical evaluation of patients emergency intervention team should be notified.before development of cardiac arrest.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Cardiac arrest is a suddenly developed unexpected clinical condition characterized with cessation of cardiac functions or inability to palpate pulsations in major arteries; loss of respiratory functions and consciousness. The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively inhospital cardiac arrest cases. Method: We aimed to evaluate the patients diagnosed with cardiac arrest developed in the hospital using cardiopulmonary resuscitation procedure (CPR). Demographic variables as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), disease groups, reversible causes of cardiac arrest, dosages of drugs used, time to return to spontaneous circulation, heart rhythm during cardiac arrest, and blood pressure values were recorded. All data were evaluated in SPSS 15.0 statistical program using appropriate tests and p<0.05 is accepted as the level of statistical significance. Results: We included 189 patients in the study with a mean age of 58.49±16.78 years. Seventyone patients were women (37.5%), 118 patients were men (62.5%). Mean BMIs of female (n=71), and male patients (n=118) were 27.04±5.78 kgm-2 and 23.60±4.37 kgm-2, respectively (p<0.05). Respective percentages of patients had experienced HT (n=66: 34.9%), DM (n=54: 28.5%), CAD (n=46: 24.3%), COPD (n=24: 12.6%), CRF (12.1%), SVD (n=27: 14.2%), CHF (n=27: 14.2%) and MI (n=13: %6.8). DM was seen in significantly higher number of women (p<0.05). NEA (18.5%), and asystole (77.2%) were arrest rhythms. The most frequently seen reversible causes that induced arrest were hypoxia (n=20: 10.6%) and hypo-hyperkalemi (n=16: 8.5%). Mean duration of CPR was 38.47±14.71 min. (n=189). In the 46 of the patients (24.3%), spontaneous circulations returned, and 143 of them (75.5%) exited. Mean duration of resuscitation applied for patients (n=46) whose spontaneous respiration was recovered was 14.80±9.07 min. SBP, and DBP were recorded as 74.35±32.63 mmHg, and 45.00±18.34 mmHg, respectively. Conclusion: In cardiac arrests of in-patiens most frequently non-shockable rhythms such as pulseless electrical activity and asystole are seen. The short duration of cardiac arrest is in favor for survival. Reversible causes of cardiac arrest should be pre-determined and in the evaluation of critical evaluation of patients emergency intervention team should be notified.before development of cardiac arrest.

Özet

Amaç: Kardiyak arrest, kardiyak fonksiyonların durması veya büyük arterlerde nabız alınamaması; solunum ve bilinç kaybı ile karakterize ani ve beklenmedik şekilde gelişen bir klinik tablodur. Bu çalışmada, hastane içi kardiyak arrest olguların prospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Hastane içinde gelişen erişkin arrest olgular, kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon (KPR) işlemi ile birlikte değerlendirmeye alındı. Yaș, cinsiyet, beden kitle indeksi (BMI), hastalık grupları, arrest sırasındaki kardiyak ritim, arreste neden olan geri döndürülebilir nedenler, kullanılan ilaç dozları, spontan dolaşım geri dönüş süresi, kan basıncı değerleri kaydedildi. Tüm veriler SPSS 15.0 istatistik programında uygun testler yapılarak değerlendirildi ve p<0.05 anlamlı kabul edildi. Bulgular: Araştırmaya 189 olgu dahil edilmiştir. Olguların yaş ortalaması 58.49±16.78’dir. Olguların 71’i (%37.5) kadın ve 118’i (%62.5) erkektir. Kadınların (n=71) BMI ortalaması 27.04±5.78 kg m-2,erkeklerin (n=118) BMI ortalaması 23.60±4.37 kg m-2 olarak saptandı (p<0.05). Olguların, %34.9’unda (n=66) HT, %28.5’inde (n=54) DM, %24.3’ünde (n=46) KAH, %12.6’sında (n=24) KOAH, %12.1’inde (n=23) KBY, %14.2’sinde (n=27) SVO, %14.2’sinde (n=27) KKY ve %6.8’inde (n=13) geçirilmiş MI mevcuttu. DM kadınlarda daha fazlaydı (p<0.05). Arrest ritimler olarak, NEA (%18.5) ve asistoli (%77.2) belirlendi. Arreste neden olan geri döndürülebilir nedenler hipoksi (%10.6 n=20) ve hipo-hiperkalemi (%8.5 n=16) en sık görülenlerdi. Resüsitasyon süresi ortalama 38.47±14.71 dk olarak saptandı (n=189). Olguların 46’sında (%24.3) spontan dolaşım geri döndü, 143’ü (%75.7) eksitus olarak kabul edildi. Spontan dolaşımı geri dönen olgulara (SDGD) (n=46) uygulanan ortalama resüsitasyon süresi 14.80±9.07 dk idi. SKB 74.35±32.63 mmHg, DKB 45.00±18.34 mmHg olarak kaydedildi. Sonuç: Hastane içi arrestlerde nabızsız elektriksel aktivite (NEA) ve asistoli gibi şoklanamayan ritmler en sık görülen ritmlerdir. SDGD süresinin kısa olması sağ kalım lehinedir. Arreste neden olan geri döndürülebilir nedenler önceden belirlenmeli ve kritik hastaların değerlendirilmesinde acil müdahale ekibi kardiyak arrest olmadan önce haberdar edilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KELEŞ, G. T., ÇEVİKKALP, E., AÇIKEL, A., TOPÇU, İ. (2019). Evaluation of in-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 44–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/146152

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Nolan JP. Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Semin Neurol. 2017;37:5-12. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597832
  2. Kloeck W, Cummins R, Chamberlain D, et al. The Universal ALS algorithm. An advisorystatement by the Advanced Life Support Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 1997;34:109-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(97)01100-3
  3. Nolan J, Soar J, Eikeland H. The chain of survival. Resuscitation. 2006;71:270-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.09.001 Fernández Lozano I, Urkía C, Lopez Mesa JB, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Key Points. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016;69:588-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2016.01.034
  4. Jacobs I, Nadkarni V, Bahr J, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the utstein templates for resuscitation registries: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heartand Stroke Foundation of Canada, Inter American Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa). Circulation. 2004;110:3385-97. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000147236.85306.15
  5. Sandroni C, Nolan J, Cavallaro F, Antonelli M. In-hospital cardiac arrest: incidence, prognosis and possiblemeasurestoimprove survival. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:237-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0326-z
  6. Nolan JP, Soar J, Smith GB et al. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Resuscitation. 2014;85:987-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.002
  7. Hesham S. Taha, Sameh WG. Bakhoum, Hussein H. Kasem, Mera AS. Fahim TAHA, Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation of in-hospital cardiac arrest and its relation to clinical outcome: An Egyptian University Hospital Experience. The Egyptian Heart Journal. 2015;67:137-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2014.11.001
  8. Shao F, Li CS, Liang LR, Qin J, Ding N, Fu Y. Incidence and outcome of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest in Beijing, China. Resuscitation. 2016;102:51-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.002
  9. Perman SM, Stanton E, Soar J et al. Location of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United StatesVariability in Event Rate and Outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:10. Nadkarni