The study of reliability and validity of the pain coping inventory

Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish form of Pain Coping Inventory (PCI) originally developed by Kraaimaat ve Evers (2003) and where pain coping is conceptualised as the composite of cognitive and behavioral active and passive strategies.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Methods: The sample consisted of a total of 279 participants with various pain complaints where 232 were women (83.2%) and 47 were men (16.8%).

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results suggest that PCI can be a useful tool for assessing coping strategies of pain patients with varying complaints of pain.

🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study

📍Scope:2003 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish form of Pain Coping Inventory (PCI) originally developed by Kraaimaat ve Evers (2003) and where pain coping is conceptualised as the composite of cognitive and behavioral active and passive strategies. Methods: The sample consisted of a total of 279 participants with various pain complaints where 232 were women (83.2%) and 47 were men (16.8%). Besides the Turkish form of PCI, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire-2, Ways of Coping Inventory and Pain Coping Questionnaire were used to determine criterion and convergent validity of the scale. Results: The principal component analysis revealed that the scale had six factors of distraction, pain transformation, comforting thinking, worrying, resting and withdrawal. The internal consistency of the subscales varied between .53 ile .77. The correlations of the subscales of PCI with criterion and convergent validity scales were significant. Conclusion: The results suggest that PCI can be a useful tool for assessing coping strategies of pain patients with varying complaints of pain.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, ağrı yönetiminde kullanılan hem aktif hem pasif başetme stratejilerini eşit ağırlıkta değerlendiren ve özgün formu Kraaimaat ve Evers (2003) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan Ağrıyla Başetme Envanteri’nin (ABE) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliliğini sınamaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmanın örneklemi, çeşitli kronik ağrı hastalarından oluşan 232’si (%83,2) kadın, 47’si (%16,8) erkek 279 yetişkinden oluşmaktadır. Veri toplamada ABE’nin yanı sıra, ölçüt ve yakınsak geçerlik sınaması için Genel Özyeterlilik Ölçeği, Ağrı Özetkinlik Ölçeği-2, Stresle Başaçıkma Tarzları Ölçeği ve Ağrıyla Başaçıkma Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Temel Bileşenler Analizi’nde ABE uzaklaşma, ağrıyı dönüştürme, rahatlatıcı düşünme, endişe, dinlenme ve geri çekilme olmak üzere altı faktör olarak bulunmuştur. Altölçeklerin Cronbach içtutarlılık katsayısı .53 ile .77 arasında değişmektedir. ABE’nin altboyutları ile diğer ölçeklerin kriter ve ölçüt geçerliliğine ilişkin korelasyon değerleri anlamlıdır. Sonuç: Bu bulgular, ABE’nin farklı gruptan ağrı hastalarında ağrıyla başetme yöntemlerini değerlendirmek amacıyla kullanılabileceğine işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HOCAOĞLU, A., BERK, H. Ö. S., KETENCİ, A. (2019). The study of reliability and validity of the pain coping inventory. Ağrı, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 32–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/145989

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

American Chronic Pain Association. ACPA Resource Guide to Chronic Pain Medication & Treatment 2013. Available at: https://www.michigan.gov/documents/lara/ACPA_Resource_Guide_2013_Final_011313_414227_7.pdf. Accessed Dec 14, 2018. Sharp TJ. Chronic pain: a reformulation of the cognitivebehavioural model. Behav Res Ther 2001;39(7):787–800.
Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York, NY: Springer; 1984.
Heutink M, Post MW, Overdulve CW, Pfennings LE, van de Vis W, Vrijens NL, et al. Which pain coping strategies and cognitions are associated with outcomes of a cognitive behavioral intervention for neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury? Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2013;19(4):330–40.
Molton IR, Stoelb BL, Jensen MP, Ehde DM, Raichle KA, Cardenas DD. Psychosocial factors and adjustment to chronic pain in spinal cord injury: replication and cross-validation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009;46(1):31–42.
Turner JA, Ersek M, Kemp C. Self-efficacy for managing pain is associated with disability, depression, and pain coping among retirement community residents with chronic pain. J Pain 2005;6(7):471–9.
Wollaars MM, Post MW, van Asbeck FW, Brand N. Spinal cord injury pain: the influence of psychologic factors and impact on quality of life. Clin J Pain 2007;23(5):383–91.
Brown GK, Nicassio PM. Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of active and passive coping strategies in chronic pain patients. Pain 1987;31(1):53–64.
Kraaimaat FW, Evers AW. Pain-coping strategies in chronic pain patients: psychometric characteristics of the pain-coping inventory (PCI). Int J Behav Med 2003;10(4):343–63.
Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Strom SE. The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory: development and preliminary validation. Pain 1995;60(2):203–16.
Tennen H, Affleck G, Zautra A. Depression history and coping with chronic pain: a daily process analysis. Health Psychol 2006;25(3):370–9.
Steultjens MP, Dekker J, Bijlsma JW. Coping, pain, and disability in osteoarthritis: a longitudinal study. J Rheumatol 2001;28(5):1068–72. Kleinke CL. How chronic pain patients cope with pain: relation to treatment outcome in a multidisciplinary pain clinic. Cog Ther and Res 1992;16:669–85.
Karaca S, Demir O, Aşkın R, Şimşek İ. Ağrı ile Başa Çıkma Ölçeği Geçerlilik ve Güvenirliği. 5. Türk-Alman Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Kongresi. Antalya, 1996.
Harrison JK, Chadwick M, Scales M. The Relationship Between Cross-Cultural Adjustment And The Personality Variables Of Self-Efficacy And Sel