Journals / Avrasya Terim Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

THE CONCEPT OF URBAN PROJECTS AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

KENTSEL PROJE KAVRAMI VE GELİŞİM SÜRECİ

Pages
74–82
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Urban Projects on the other hand, emerged as fundamental means of this approach by fostering economical growth, conducting the development, creating a new administrative model by republic-private co-operations, establishing social equilibrium and livable environments by mixed usages The aim of this paper is to evaluate the development process of the project base approaches to urban development and concept of urban project and to examine the development process of this new form of intervention for urban space.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Depending on the spatial reflections of different social and political developments, which are defined as transformation dynamics, the concepts of urban planning and urban design differ through the time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After the new developments of the urban transformation, globalization brought forward the concept of Spatial Strategic Planning in order for the cities to take part in the international competitive environment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Urban Projects on the other hand, emerged as fundamental means of this approach by fostering economical growth, conducting the development, creating a new administrative model by republic-private co-operations, establishing social equilibrium and livable environments by mixed usages The aim of this paper is to evaluate the development process of the project base approaches to urban development and concept of urban project and to examine the development process of this new form of intervention for urban space.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Depending on the spatial reflections of different social and political developments, which are defined as transformation dynamics, the concepts of urban planning and urban design differ through the time. After the new developments of the urban transformation, globalization brought forward the concept of Spatial Strategic Planning in order for the cities to take part in the international competitive environment. Urban Projects on the other hand, emerged as fundamental means of this approach by fostering economical growth, conducting the development, creating a new administrative model by republic-private co-operations, establishing social equilibrium and livable environments by mixed usages The aim of this paper is to evaluate the development process of the project base approaches to urban development and concept of urban project and to examine the development process of this new form of intervention for urban space.

Özet

Değişim dinamikleri olarak tanımlanan farklı ekonomik ve siyasal gelişmelerin, mekânsal ölçekte yansıma biçimine bağlı olarak, kent planlama ve tasarım anlayışı dönemsel olarak farklı biçimlerde anlam kazanmıştır. Kentsel değişim sürecinde gelişen yeni yapılanmalar ile birlikte, Küreselleşme, kentlerin uluslararası düzlemde artan rekabet ortamında yer alabilmesi için Mekânsal Stratejik Planlama yaklaşımını gündeme getirmiştir. Kentsel projeler ise ekonomik güç kazanma, gelişmeyi yönlendirme, kamu-özel işbirlikleri ile yeni bir yönetim modeli oluşturma, karma kullanımlar ile sosyal dengeyi kurma ve yaşanabilir çevreler yaratma hedefi ile bu yaklaşımın en temel eylem alanları olarak yapılanmaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kentsel gelişmede proje temelli yaklaşımları ve kentsel proje kavramını ele almak kentsel mekâna yönelik bu yeni müdahale biçiminin kavramsal gelişim sürecini irdelemektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKIR, N. Y. (2013). THE CONCEPT OF URBAN PROJECTS AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. Avrasya Terim Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 74–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/145968

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Albrechts, L., 2006. Bridge the Gap: From Spatial Planning to Strategic Projects, European Planning Studies, 14/10, 1487-1500.
  2. Altshuler, Alan A. and David E. Luberoff 2004. MegaProjects: The Changing Asia. Urban Studies, 37 (12), pp. 315-335.
  3. Bianchini, F. and Parkinson, M. 1993. Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: the West European Experience, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  4. Brenner, N., Jamie P., and Theodore N., 2010a. After neoliberalization?’, Globalizations, 7: 3, pp. 327– 345. Brenner, N., Peck, J. And Theodore, N. 2010b. Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways. Global Networks 9, In Press.
  5. Çubuk, M., 1993. “Kentsel Gelişmenin önlenmesinde Kentsel Tasarım ve Yeni Denge Araçları: Büyük Kentsel Projeler”, 4. Kentsel Tasarım ve Uygulamalar Sempozyumu, 26-27 Mayıs,1993.
  6. Douglass, M. 1999. Mega-Urban Regions and World City Formation: Politics of Urban Public Investment (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy). Erden Erbey, D., 2004. Kentsel Koruma ve Yenileşmede Dönüşüm Projeleri – Eyüp Rehabilitasyon Projeleri. Planlama Dergisi, Sayı,4. Faludi, A., 1996. European planning doctrine: A bridge too far? Journal of Planning Education and Research 16, 41-50.
  7. Gospodini, A., 2002. European Cities İn Competition And The New ‘Uses’ Of urban Design, Journal Of Urban Design, 7/1, 59–73. Gospodini, A., 2005. Landscape Transformations İn The Postmodern Inner City: Clustering Flourishing Economic Activities And ‘Glocalising’ Morphologies. Sustainable Development and Planning II,, 2. Graham, S. and Marvin, S., 2001. Urban Futures? Integrating Telecommunications into Urban Planning. Madanipor, A., Hull, A. and Healey, P., eds. The Governance of Place: Space and Planning Processes. Aldershot: Ashgate. Hajer M. and Reijndrop A. 2001. In Search of New Public Domain. NAI Publishers, Rotterdam, 2003.
  8. Hall, P. 1993. Cities and Regions in a Global Economy. In: Hall, P., Guzman, R. de, Madduma Bandara, C.M., Kato, A. (ed.) Multilateral Cooperation for Development in the Twenty-First Century: Training and Research for Regional Development, 6-26. Nagoya: United Nations Centre for Regional Development. Harvey, D. 1989.
  9. The Condition of Postmodernity, Oxford, Blackwell, Türkçe Çevirisi: Postmodernliğin Durumu, 1997, Metis Yayınları, çev: S. Savran. Konuk, G., 2007. Planlamada Değişim ve Yeni Arayışlar. İstanbul Buluşmaları Sempozyumu, “İstanbul’da Büyük Projeler”8–9 Ekim 2007.
  10. Lecroart and Palisse, J-P