Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Representativeness of an air quality monitoring station for PM2.5and sourceapportionment over a small urban domain

Pages
225–233
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The significant spatial variation in concentrations and sourcecontribution estimates showed that the monitoring station could not be considered representative for the airquality monitoring studies with exposure assessment and source apportionment purposes in Varese.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, PM2.5concentrations together with the water-soluble ionic compounds and total elements weresimultaneously measured at 16 sites in the city of Varese located in Northern Italy within a domain of 2 × 2 km2.The center point of this domain consisted of an existing urban air quality monitoring station.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The representa-tiveness of the monitoring station for PM2.5mass and chemical composition was estimated using a methodologyrelying on statistical/geostatistical analyses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The significant spatial variation in concentrations and sourcecontribution estimates showed that the monitoring station could not be considered representative for the airquality monitoring studies with exposure assessment and source apportionment purposes in Varese.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, PM2.5concentrations together with the water-soluble ionic compounds and total elements weresimultaneously measured at 16 sites in the city of Varese located in Northern Italy within a domain of 2 × 2 km2.The center point of this domain consisted of an existing urban air quality monitoring station. The representa-tiveness of the monitoring station for PM2.5mass and chemical composition was estimated using a methodologyrelying on statistical/geostatistical analyses. Source apportionment by means of the Chemical Mass Balance(CMB) receptor model was also performed to evaluate the spatial distribution of source contribution throughoutthe domain. Very high soluble fraction was found for Cd, Sb, K and V, indicating the anthropogenic origin ofthose elements. The geostatistical analysis/mapping showed that the monitoring station captured the spatialvariation of PM2.5and most of the anthropogenic originated elements, e.g., As, Cd and V, whereas it did notcaptured the spatial patterns of the ones originated from both natural and anthropogenic sources, e.g., Na, Ni,Pb, K, Zn, Fe, Cr, and Ti. The CMB source contribution estimations in the monitoring station were at least 25%different from many sites of the domain for PM2.5. The significant spatial variation in concentrations and sourcecontribution estimates showed that the monitoring station could not be considered representative for the airquality monitoring studies with exposure assessment and source apportionment purposes in Varese.

🔖

Cite This Article

YATKİN, S., GERBOLES, M., BELİS, C., KARAGULİAN, F., LAGLER, F., BARBİERE, M., BOROWİAK, A. (2020). Representativeness of an air quality monitoring station for PM2.5and sourceapportionment over a small urban domain. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 225–233. https://ajindex.com/articles/145942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Beelen, R., Hoek, G., Vienneau, D., Eeftens, M., Dimakopoulou, K., Pedeli, X., et al., 2013.Development of NO2and NOx land use regression models for estimating air pollutionexposure in 36 study areas in Europe - the ESCAPE project. Atmos. Environ. 72,10–23.
  2. Belis, C.A., Karagulian, F., Larsen, B.R., Hopke, P.K., 2013. Critical review and meta-analysis of ambient particulate matter source apportionment using receptor models inEurope. Atmos. Environ. 69, 94–108.
  3. Bukowiecki, N., Gehrig, R., Hill, M., Lienemann, P., Zwicky, C.N., Buchmann, B., et al.,2007. Iron, manganese and copper emitted by cargo and passenger trains in Zurich(Switzerland): size-segregated mass concentrations in ambient air. Atmos. Environ.41, 878–889. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 may 2008 onambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Off. J. Eur. Union L 152/1 of 11.6.http://eur-lex.europa.eu.
  4. Duvall, R.M., Norris, G.A., Burke, J.M., Olson, D.A., Vedantham, R., Williams, R., 2012.Determining spatial variability in PM2.5source impacts across Detroit, MI. Atmos.Environ. 47 591-498.
  5. Goldman, G.T., Mulholland, J.A., Russell, A.G., et al., 2010. Ambient air pollutant mea-surement error: characterization and impacts in a time-series epidemiologic study in Atlanta. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7692–7698.
  6. Heal, H.R., Hibbs, L.R., Agius, R.M., Beverland, I.J., 2005. Total and water-soluble tracemetal content of urban background PM10, PM2.5 and black smoke in Edinburgh, UK.Atmos. Environ. 39 1437-1430.
  7. Isaak, E.H., Srivastava, R.M., 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. OxfordUniversity Press,
  8. New York. Johnson, M., Isakov, V., Touma, J.S., Mukarjee, S., Ozkaynak, H., 2010. Evaluation ofland-use regression models used to predict air quality concentrations in an urbanarea. Atmos. Environ. 44, 3660–3668.
  9. Kanaroglou, P.S., Jerrett, M., Morrison, J., Beckerman, B., Arain, M.A., Gilbert, N.L.,Brook, J.R., 2005. Establishing an air pollution monitoring network for intra-urbanpopulation exposure assessment: a location-allocation approach. Atmos. Environ. 39(13), 2399–2409.
  10. Kim, E., Hopke, P.K., Pinto, J.P., Wilson, W.E., 2005. Spatial variability offine particlemass, components, and source contributions during the regional air pollution study inst. Louis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 4172–4179.
  11. Kracht, O., Santiago José, L., Martin, F., Piersanti, A., Cremona, G., Righini, G., Gerboles,M., 2017a.Spatial Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Sites: O