Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2

Factors associated with needle breakage of antegrade suture passer and effect of intratendinous remnant needle tip on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Pages
106–114
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The retained broken needle tip was associated with higher pain scores during the early postoperative period, but revealed no difference in final outcomes by using PSM.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with the needle breakage of antegrade suture passer and the effect of intratendinous remnant needle tip on clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 283 patients (138 men and 145 women; mean age: 59.7 ± 9.3 years) who underwent arthroscopic repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tear.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The retained broken needle tip was associated with higher pain scores during the early postoperative period, but revealed no difference in final outcomes by using PSM.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with the needle breakage of antegrade suture passer and the effect of intratendinous remnant needle tip on clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 283 patients (138 men and 145 women; mean age: 59.7 ± 9.3 years) who underwent arthroscopic repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tear. We evaluated the characteristics of 16 patients in whose needle tip had been broken and embedded and remained in the rotator cuff (remnant needle group) and compared them with the remaining 267 patients (control group). Afterwards, another 64 patients were selected from control group (1:4 matching) after propensity score matching (PSM). The groups were compared anatomically with MRI or ultrasonography and functionally (serial pain VAS and ROM; ASES, Constant, UCLA and SST scores) at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Results: The remnant needle group showed preoperative thicker tendon (6.72 mm vs 5.33 mm, p ¼ 0.047), higher tendinosis (mean grade, 1.88 vs. 1.43, p ¼ 0.029), and more frequent delaminated tears (p ¼ 0.035) compared with control group. When we compare the clinical outcomes after PSM, the initial pain VAS of the remnant needle tip group was higher up to 3 months (pain VAS: 4.13 ± 2.07 vs 2.48 ± 1.61 (p ¼ 0.032) at 5 weeks and 3.79 ± 2.12 vs 2.25 ± 1.76 (p ¼ 0.044) at 3 months), however the difference disappeared after 6 months postoperatively. In final evaluation, there was no significant differences in every outcome parameters (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: Breakage of the needle of the antegrade suture passer occurred more frequently in the thicker tendon, higher tendinosis, and delaminated tears. The retained broken needle tip was associated with higher pain scores during the early postoperative period, but revealed no difference in final outcomes by using PSM.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHUNG, S. W., OH, K., KI, S., KIM, J., YOON, J. P., KIM, J. Y. (2019). Factors associated with needle breakage of antegrade suture passer and effect of intratendinous remnant needle tip on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2, 106–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/145910

References (14)

  1. Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004
  2. A(2):219e224. Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J. The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000
  3. 82(4):505e515. Fehringer EV, Sun J, VanOeveren LS, Keller BK, Matsen 3rd FA. Full-thickness rotator cuff tear prevalence and correlation with function and comorbidities in patients sixty-five years and older. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008
  4. 17(6):881e885. Hapa O, Karakas¸ lı A, Bas¸ çı O, Cici H, Çeçen B, Havitçioglu H. The primary factor for suture configuration at rotator cuff repair: width of mattress or distance from tear edge. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Aug
  5. 50(4):448e451. Gotman I, Ben-David D, Unger RE, Bose T, Gutmanas EY, Kirkpatrick CJ. Mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation on load-bearing trabecular Nitinol scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2013
  6. 9(9):8440e8448. Song HS, Ramsey ML. Suture passing needle breakage during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a complication report. Arthroscopy. 2008
  7. 24(12):1430e1432. Oh JH, Kim SH, Lee HK, Jo KH, Bin SW, Gong HS. Moderate preoperative shoulder stiffness does not alter the clinical outcome of rotator cuff repair with arthroscopic release and manipulation. Arthroscopy. 2008
  8. 24(9):983e991. Chung SW, Huong CB, Kim SH, Oh JH. Shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair: risk factors and influence on outcome. Arthroscopy. 2013
  9. 29(2): 290e300. Chung SW, Park JS, Kim SH, Shin SH, Oh JH. Quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: evaluation using SF-36 and an analysis of affecting clinical factors. Am J Sports Med. 2012
  10. 40(3):631e639. DeOrio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984
  11. 66(4):563e567. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994
  12. 78e83. Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C. Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999
  13. 8(6):599e605. Walz DM, Miller TT, Chen S, Hofman J. MR imaging of delamination tears of the rotator cuff tendons. Skeletal Radiol. 2007
  14. 36(5):411e416. Gilbert F, Meffert RH, Schmalzl J, Weng AM, Kost