Journals / Central Bank Review / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Effects of interest rate on the macroeconomic variables under different uncertainty levels: Interaction vector autoregressive model application for Turkey

Farklı belirsizlik düzeylerinde faiz oranının makroekonomik değişkenlere etkileri: Türkiye üzerine etkileşimli vektör otoregresif modeli uygulaması

Pages
65–93
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Empirical results indicate that an increase in the interest rate decreases the exchange rate, price level and income level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, the effectiveness of tight monetary policy on the macroeconomic variables has been analyzed by applying an interactive autoregressive model under different inflation uncertainty levels using the monthly Turkish data spanning 1991: 01 – 2014: 01.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Empirical results indicate that an increase in the interest rate decreases the exchange rate, price level and income level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it is shown that the tight monetary policy is more efficient when the long- term average inflation rate becomes more stable and short-term volatility decreases.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, the effectiveness of tight monetary policy on the macroeconomic variables has been analyzed by applying an interactive autoregressive model under different inflation uncertainty levels using the monthly Turkish data spanning 1991: 01 – 2014: 01. Empirical results indicate that an increase in the interest rate decreases the exchange rate, price level and income level. In addition, when we apply the low inflation uncertainty as an interaction term, it is observed that the effectiveness of an increase in the interest rate on the macroeconomic variables becomes more obvious. As a result, it is shown that the tight monetary policy is more efficient when the long- term average inflation rate becomes more stable and short-term volatility decreases.

Özet

Bu çalışmada etkileşimli vektör otoregresif model yardımıyla, farklı enflasyon belirsizliği düzeylerinde daraltıcı para politikasının makroekonomik değişkenler üzerindekietkinliği Türkiye aylık 1991: 01 – 2014: 01 verisi ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgularagöre, faiz oranındaki bir artış döviz kuru, fiyat düzeyi ve gelir düzeyinde azalışa nedenolmaktadır. Bununla birlikte etkileşim terimi olarak düşük enflasyon belirsizliğikullanıldığında, faiz oranındaki artışın makroekonomik değişkenler üzerindeki etkinliği belirginleşmektedir. Sonuç olarak, enflasyon oranının uzun dönem ortalamasının dahaistikrarlı hale gelmesi ve kısa dönemli oynaklığının belirgin bir şekilde azalması, daraltıcıpara politikasının etkinliğini artırmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, A., ÜLKE, V. (2015). Effects of interest rate on the macroeconomic variables under different uncertainty levels: Interaction vector autoregressive model application for Turkey. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 65–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/145870

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. ALTUĞ, Sumru ve ÇAKMAKLI, Cem. 2014. “Inflation Targeting and Inflation Exp ectations: Evidence for Brazil and Turkey” ERF Working Paper No. 1413, April: 1 - 38. BAKER, Scott, BLOOM, N icholas, DAVIS, Steven J. 2013. “Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty” Chicago Booth Research Paper, Vol. 13, No. 12:1 -48. BASHAR, Omar, WADUD, İ.K.M, HUSON, Ahmed Ali. 2013. “Oil Price Uncertainty, Monetary Policy and the Macroeconomy: The Canadian Perspective” Economic Modelling, Vol. 35: 249 -259. BERNANKE, BS., BOIVIN, J., ELIASZ, PS. 2005. “Measuring the Effects of Monetary Policy: A Factor Augmented Vector Autoregressive (FAVA) Approach” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120: 387 -422. BERUMENT, Hakan, ŞAHİN, A., DOGAN, Burak. 2013. “Effectiveness of the Reserve Option Mechanism as a Macroeconomic Prudential Tool: Evidence from Turkey” mimeo. BERU MENT, Hakan ve ŞAHİN, Afşin. 2010. “Seasonality in Inflation Vo latility: Evidence from Turkey” Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 13, No. 1: 39 -65. BERUMENT, Hakan, TOGAY, Selahattin ve ŞAHİN, Afşin. 2011. “An Identification of Monetary Policy Disturbances Using Non-Borrowed Reserves for a Small Open Economy: Turkey” Open Economies Review, V ol. 22, No. 4: 649 -667. BERUMENT, Hakan, ŞAHİN, Afşin ve KÖSE, Nezir. 2010. “Seasonal Patterns of Inflation Uncertainty for the US Economy: an EGARCH Model Results”, IUP Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 8, No. 2: 7 - 22. BERUMENT, Hakan, YALÇIN, Yeliz, Y ILDIRIM, Jülide. 2011. “The Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty Relationship for Turkey: A Dynamic Framework” Empirical Economics, 41: 293 -309. BERUMENT, Hakan, DİNÇER, Nergiz ve MUSTAFAOĞLU, Zafer. 2011. “Total Factor Productivity and Macroeconomic Instab ility” The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 20(5): 605 -629. BHAR, Ramprasad ve MALLIK, Girijasankar. 2013. “Inflation Uncertainty, Growth Uncertainty, Oil Prices and Output Growth in the UK” Empirical Economics, 45: 1333 - 1350. BLOOM, Nicholas. 2009. “The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks” Econometrica, 77(3): 623 - 685. BREDIN, Don, ELDER, John, FOUNTAS, Stilianos. 2009. “Macroeconomic Uncertainty and Performance in Asian Countries” Review of Development Economic, 13(2): 215 -229. BROOKS, Chris. 2008. In troductory Econometrics for Finance, Cambridge University Press.
  2. Second Edition,
  3. USA, CHAN, Louis K.C. 1994. “Consumption, Inflation Risk, Real Interest Rates: An Empirical Analysis” The Journal of Business, 67(1): 69 -96. CHANG, Kuang - L