Journals / Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 6

LEGAL STRUCTURE OF INVESTOR COMPENSATION CENTER (ICC), AS A CAPITAL MARKET INSTITUTION

Pages
631–644
Publication Date
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of the paper is to examine thoroughly the legal structure and operation of the ICC and its functions in Turkish Capital Market Law.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Investor Compensation Center (ICC) has played an important role during “dematerialization” in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although the dematerialization of capital market instruments has been regulated by former Capital Market Law No. 2499 published in the Official Gazette number 17416 on July 30, 1981, The Investor Compensation Center was established by the Capital Market Law No. 6362, published in the Official Gazette number 28513 on December 30, 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of the paper is to examine thoroughly the legal structure and operation of the ICC and its functions in Turkish Capital Market Law.
🔬Design:Konferans Bildirisi
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Dematerialisation · Capital Market Act · Compensation

Özet

The Investor Compensation Center (ICC) has played an important role during “dematerialization” in Turkey. The “dematerialization process” of capital market instruments, caused some serious legal problems, in almost every country. Although the dematerialization of capital market instruments has been regulated by former Capital Market Law No. 2499 published in the Official Gazette number 17416 on July 30, 1981, The Investor Compensation Center was established by the Capital Market Law No. 6362, published in the Official Gazette number 28513 on December 30, 2012. Structure, administration and representation of the ICC, alteration of traditional negotiable instrument law and physical system, the principles related to dematerialization established by the Capital Market Board, legal issues during dematerialization, scope of compensation, compensation procedure have been evaluated, in this paper. The aim of the paper is to examine thoroughly the legal structure and operation of the ICC and its functions in Turkish Capital Market Law.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kubilay, H. (2019). LEGAL STRUCTURE OF INVESTOR COMPENSATION CENTER (ICC), AS A CAPITAL MARKET INSTITUTION. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 6, 631–644. https://ajindex.com/articles/1457740

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. ER, Ali Sami, Renewed Communique and Guide for Disclosure of Material Events, http://www.erdem-erdem.av.tr/publications/law-post/renewed-communiqu%C3%A9-and-guide-for-disclosure-of-material-events/
  2. POROY, Reha/TEKİNALP, Ünal, Kıymetli Evrak Hukuku Esasları, İstanbul 2013.
  3. ÖCAL, Öykü, Sermaye Piyasası Araçlarında Kaydileştirme ve Mülkiyet Sorunu, https://tr.linkedin.com/pulse/sermaye-piyasas%C4%B1-ara%C3%A7lar%C4%B1nda-kaydile%C5%9Ftirme-ve-m%C3%BClkiyet-%C3%B6yk%C3%BC-%C3%B6cal
  4. ÖZDEMİR, Elif Demirel, Sermaye Piyasası Uyuşmazlıklarinin Alternatif Yöntemlerle Çözümünde Tahkim, Uzmanlık Tezi, Ekonomik Modelleme ve Konjonktür Değerlendirme Genel Müdürlüğü, Mart 2019, http://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Sermaye-Piyasas%C4%B1-Uyu%C5%9Fmazl%C4%B1klar%C4%B1n%C4%B1n-Alternatif-Y%C3%B6ntemlerle-%C3%87%C3%B6z%C3%BCm%C3%BCnde-Tahkim.pd
  5. TEKİNALP, Ünal, Evraksız Kıymetli Evraka veya Kıymet Haklarına Doğru, BATİDER, C.XIV, S.3, s.1 vd. TEKİNALP, Ünal, Nama Yazılı Payların Devrinde Merkezi Kayıt Kuruluşunun Kayıtlarının Etkisi ve Niteliği, Prof.Dr.Tahir Çağa’nın Anısına Armağan (İstanbul Çağa Vakfı), İstanbul 2000, s.537. TURANBOY, Asuman, Varakasız Kıymetli Evrak, Ankara 1998.
  6. TURKISH CAPITAL MARKET ASSOCIATIONS, Handbook of the Turkish Capital Markets, 2016, https://www.tspb.org.tr/tr/handbook-of-the-turkish-capital-markets-yayinlandi/