SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

AN EVALUATION ON REMOTE WORKING METHOD IN CONTEXT OF WORK-LIFE BALANCE, PRODUCTIVITY, TRUST AND FLEXIBILITY

Meri Taksi Deveciyan(İSTANBUL KÜLTÜR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9206-0315
Hazal Koray Alay(ISTANBUL ESENYURT UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6638-3089
Pages
193–207
Publication Date
2023-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings are very inspiring for future studies, as they reveal the role played by the remote working as a widely used method today on productivity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Due to the outbreak of the Covid-19 epidemic, the remote working method has become a necessity rather than a choice for businesses and employees.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data obtained from 571 people and collected by convenience sampling were analyzed through the SPSS 20 program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings are very inspiring for future studies, as they reveal the role played by the remote working as a widely used method today on productivity.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Remote work · flexibility · trust

Abstract

Due to the outbreak of the Covid-19 epidemic, the remote working method has become a necessity rather than a choice for businesses and employees. This compelling and sudden change in working life created new conditions. In turn, they have brought the factors affecting employee productivity as a determining factor in the success of businesses to the agenda again. In this context, this study aims to examine the impact of flexible working conditions, the environment of trust and work-life balance variables on employees' productivity with a focus on remote working methods. The cross-sectional survey method is used as a data collection and analysis method in the research. The data obtained from 571 people and collected by convenience sampling were analyzed through the SPSS 20 program. In light of its findings, it has been found that the variables of flexibility, trust environment, and work-life balance were related to the productivity variable and that the flexibility and trust environment variables had a high explanatory power for the productivity variable. Although the work-life balance variable has a negative relationship with productivity, it has been found that its explanatory power is low. The findings are very inspiring for future studies, as they reveal the role played by the remote working as a widely used method today on productivity.

Özet

Due to the outbreak of the Covid-19 epidemic, the remote working method has become a necessity rather than a choice for businesses and employees. This compelling and sudden change in working life created new conditions. In turn, they have brought the factors affecting employee productivity as a determining factor in the success of businesses to the agenda again. In this context, this study aims to examine the impact of flexible working conditions, the environment of trust and work-life balance variables on employees' productivity with a focus on remote working methods. The cross-sectional survey method is used as a data collection and analysis method in the research. The data obtained from 571 people and collected by convenience sampling were analyzed through the SPSS 20 program. In light of its findings, it has been found that the variables of flexibility, trust environment, and work-life balance were related to the productivity variable and that the flexibility and trust environment variables had a high explanatory power for the productivity variable. Although the work-life balance variable has a negative relationship with productivity, it has been found that its explanatory power is low. The findings are very inspiring for future studies, as they reveal the role played by remote working as a widely used method today on productivity.

🔖

Cite This Article

Deveciyan, M. T., Alay, H. K. (2023). AN EVALUATION ON REMOTE WORKING METHOD IN CONTEXT OF WORK-LIFE BALANCE, PRODUCTIVITY, TRUST AND FLEXIBILITY. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 193–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/1457138

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Alkan Meşhur, H. F. (2007). Geleceğin çalışma biçimi tele çalışmaya ilişkin yaklaşımlar. Akademik Bilişim, 7(09), 265-272.
  2. Almer, E. D., & Kaplan, S. E. (2002). THA effects of flexible work arrangements on stressors, burnout, and behavioral job outcomes in public accounting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14(1), 1-34.
  3. Anderson, D., Kelliher, C. (2020). Enforced remote working and thework-life interfaceduringlockdown. Gender in Management: An International Journal.
  4. Barber, L.K., Santuzzi, A.M. (2015), “Pleaserespond ASAP: workplacetelepressureandemployeerecovery”, Journal of OccupationalHealthPsychology, Vol. 20, p. 172.
  5. Bentley, T., Teo, S., Mcleod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R. andGloet, M. (2016), “The role of organisationalsupport in teleworkerwellbeing: a socio-technicalsystemsapproach”, AppliedErgonomics, Vol. 52, pp. 207-215.
  6. Blomqvist, K. (1997). TheManyFaces of Trust, ScandinavianJournal of Management, 13: 3, 271-286
  7. Blomqvist, K., &Ståhle, P. (2000, September). Buildingorganizationaltrust. In 16th Annual IMP Conference, Bath, UK (pp. 7-9).
  8. Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J.,Ying, Z.J. (2015), “Doesworkingfromhomework? Evidencefrom a Chineseexperiment”, TheQuarterlyJournal of Economics, Vol. 130, pp. 165-218.
  9. Bond, J.; Galinsky, E.WorkplaceFlexibilityandLow-WageEmployees. WorkforceResearch: NationalStudy of theChanginWorkforce. 2011.
  10. Chesley, N. (2010), “Technologyuseandemployeeassessments of workeffectiveness, workload, andpace of life”, Information, CommunicationandSociety, Vol. 13, pp. 485-514.
  11. Chesley, N. (2014), “Information andcommunicationtechnologyuse, workintensificationandemployeestrainanddistress”, Work, EmploymentandSociety, Vol. 28, pp. 589-610.
  12. Fonner, K. L., Roloff, M.E. (2010), “Whyteleworkersaremoresatisfiedwiththeirjobsthanareoffice-basedworkers: whenlesscontact is beneficial”, Journal of AppliedCommunicationResearch, Vol. 38, pp. 336-361.
  13. Gajendran, R.S., Harrison, D.A. (2007), “Thegood, thebad, andtheunknownabouttelecommuting: meta-analysis of psychologicalmediatorsandindividualconsequences”, Journal of AppliedPsychology, Vol. 92, p. 1524.
  14. Golden, L. (2001). Flexibleworkschedules: Whatarewetradingofftogetthem. MonthlyLab. Rev., 124, 50.
  15. Golden, L. (2008). WorkplaceFlexibilityandSalariedWorkers: Access, Gaps, andEffects on Work-Family. Presentation at WorkingforChange: A Conversation on WorkplaceFlexibilityResearch, Business Practice, andPublicPolicy: Georgetown Law, Washington DC, USA.
  16. Golden, T.D. (2012), “Alteringtheeffects of workandfamilyconflict on exhaustion: teleworkduringtraditionalandnontraditionalworkhours”, Journal of Business andPsychology, Vol. 27, pp. 255-269.
  17. Grant, C., Wallace, M. andSpurgeon, P. (2011), “Thedevelopment of an ‘actionable’ e-work life scalewithreferenceto self-reportedwell-beingandjobeffectiveness”, Unpublisheddoctoralthesis, CoventryUniversity, Coventry.
  18. Grant, C.A., Wallace, L.M. Spurgeon, P.C. (2013), “An exploration of thepsychologicalfactorsaffectingremote e-worker’sjobeffectiveness, well-beingandwork-life balance”, EmployeeRelations, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 527-546.
  19. Halpern, D. F. (2005). How time‐flexibleworkpolicies can reducestress, improvehealth, andsavemoney. Stressandhealth, 21(3), 157-168.
  20. Kandemir, Murat: İş Hukuku ve Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku Açısından Tele Çalışma, İstanbul, Legal Kitapevi, Nisan, 2011, s. 46-111.
  21. Kapız, S. 2002. İş-Aile Yaşamı Dengesi ve Dengeye Yönelik Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Sınır Teorisi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(3), ss. 139-153.
  22. Kim, J., Henly, J. R., Golden, L. M., & Lambert, S. J. (2020). Workplaceflexibilityandworkerwell‐beingbygender. Journal of marriageandfamily, 82(3), 892-910.
  23. Kossek, E. E. (2015). Capturingsocialandculturalinfluences: Relatingindividualwork-life experiencestocontext. Community, Work&Family, 18(4), 371-376.
  24. Lal, B., (2009). “Homeworkers’ usage of mobile phones; socialisolation in thehomeworkplace”, Journal Of Enterprise Information Management, C: XXII, No:3.
  25. Luhman, N., (2000) Vertrauen. EinMechanismus der ReduktionsozialerKomplexitaet, Stuttgart Enke 4. Auflage, Germany.
  26. Phillips, S. (2020). Workingthroughthepandemic: Acceleratingthetransitiontoremoteworking. Business Information Review, 37(3), 129-134.
  27. Prasad, D. K., Mangipudi, D. M. R., Vaidya, D. R., &Muralidhar, B. (2020). Organizationalclimate, opportunities, challengesandpsychologicalwellbeing of theremoteworkingemployeesduring COVID-19 pandemic: a general linear model approachwith reference toinformationtechnologyindustry in hyderabad. International Journal of Advanced Research in EngineeringandTechnology (IJARET), 11(4).
  28. Soysal, T., (2006). Tele çalışma. Legal İş Hukuku ve Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku Dergisi, 9 (1), ss. 133-165
  29. Sullivan, C. (2012). Remote workingandwork-life balance. In Workandquality of life (pp. 275-290). Springer, Dordrecht.
  30. Thompson, R. J., &Kossek, E. E. (2018). Workplaceflexibility: Strategiestohelporganizationsnavigate global expansion.
  31. Ülkü, M., (2022).Uzaktan Çalışmada Verimlilik: Zonguldak Devlet Okullarında Bir Araştırma,Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Zonguldak
  32. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., &Parker, S. K. (2021). Achievingeffectiveremoteworkingduringthe COVID‐19 pandemic: A workdesignperspective. Appliedpsychology, 70(1), 16-59.
  33. Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Ve Erdoğan, S. (2004). SPSS Uygulamali Bilimsel Arastirma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayincilik, 49, 50.
  34. Zhou J, Lopez J, Deng R, Bao F (2005) Information security, 8th internationalconference, ISC 2005, Singapore, September 20–23, Proceedings, lecturenotes in computingscience, p 483