Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in endodontics: An update

KIBT’nin (Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi) endodontide kullanımı:Durum güncellemesi

Pages
248–252
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Referral criteria for endodontics should be updated routinely in light of newer investigations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recently, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly used in endodontics due its advantages over medical CT.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This updated review aims to explain fundamentals of CBCT and show its indications in 15 diagnosis and treatment in endodontics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Referral criteria for endodontics should be updated routinely in light of newer investigations.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Recently, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly used in endodontics due its advantages over medical CT. This updated review aims to explain fundamentals of CBCT and show its indications in 15 diagnosis and treatment in endodontics. Although, CBCT may provide useful information in several endodontic cases it must be only used in correct indications where its usage provides direct benefits over its risks. Referral criteria for endodontics should be updated routinely in light of newer investigations.

Özet

KIBT, son zamanlarda endodontide medikal BT ile karşılaştırıldığında ortaya çıkan avantajları ile sıkça 5 kullanılmaktadır. Bu güncel derlemenin amacı KIBT’nin özelliklerini, endodontide teşhis ve tedavide kullanım amaçlarını ortaya koymaktır. Endodontik açıdan KIBT birçok faydalı bilgi sağlasa da olası riskleri hesaplanarak sadece direkt fayda sağlayacak endikasyonlarda kullanılmalıdır. Endodontik endikasyonlarla ilgili kriterler araştırmalar ışığında sürekli yenilenmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇ, C., YILMAZ, F., KAMBUROĞLU, K. (2019). Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in endodontics: An update. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 248–252. https://ajindex.com/articles/145548

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kamburoğlu K, Acar B, Yakar EN, Paksoy CS. Dentomaksillofasiyal Konik Isın Demetli Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Bölüm 1: Temel Prensipler. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi 2012; 6: 1125-1136
  2. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Cone beam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1088-1095
  3. Kamburoğlu K, Yakar EN, Acar B, Paksoy CS. Dentomaksillofasiyal Konik Isın Demetli Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Bölüm 2: Klinik Uygulamalar. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi 2012; 6: 1160-1165
  4. AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics 2015 Update. Special Committee to Revise the Joint AAE/AAOMR Position Statement on use of CBCT in Endodontics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015; 120: 508-512
  5. Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A 1984; 6: 612-619
  6. Durack C, Patel S. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Brazilian Dental Journal 2012; 23: 179- 191
  7. Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, van der Stelt P, Wesselink PR. Comparison of five computed tomography systems for the detection of vertical root fractures. J Endod 2010; 36: 126-129
  8. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: Recognition and Avoidance. RadioGraphics 2004; 24: 1679-1691
  9. Matherne PR, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod 2008; 1: 87-89
  10. Low KMT, Dula K, Bürgin W, von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod 2008; 34: 557-562
  11. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathosis using periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography- part1: preoperative status. Int Endod J 2012; 8: 702-710
  12. Ozen T, Kamburoğlu K, Cebeci AR, Yüksel SP, Paksoy CS. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 426-432
  13. Uraba S, Ebihara A, Komatsu K, Ohbayashi N, Okiji T. Ability of cone-beam computed tomography to detect periapical lesions that were not detected by periapical radiography: a retrospective asessment according to tooth group. J Endod 2016; 42: 1186-1190
  14. Leonardi Dutra K, Haas L, Porporatti AL, Flores-Mir C, Nascimento Santos J, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Con