Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

CAD/CAM high strength glass ceramics

CAD/CAM yüksek dayanımlı cam seramikler

Pages
224–230
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, recent literature support and material properties of high strength glass ceramics, which became popular recently, were examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Day by day, developments in digital dentistry are accelerated with the increase of patient’s improved faster and aesthetic treatment expectations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Computer aided design and manufacturing (CAD / CAM) technology makes it possible to manufacture restorations in a single appointment with new restorative materials that meets these expectations of the patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, recent literature support and material properties of high strength glass ceramics, which became popular recently, were examined.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Day by day, developments in digital dentistry are accelerated with the increase of patient’s improved faster and aesthetic treatment expectations. Computer aided design and manufacturing (CAD / CAM) technology makes it possible to manufacture restorations in a single appointment with new restorative materials that meets these expectations of the patients. In order to eliminate the disadvantages of feldspatic porcelain and leucite-reinforced glass ceramics, which is the basis of dental porcelain with low flexural strength, has been added to the ceramic structure for reinforcement of the materials. This has improved monolithic materials that do not require veneering. Thus, the core material has not been needed, and therefore problems with porcelain-core connection have been eliminated. Consequently, prefabricated discs and blocks with stronger structural integrity are available for CAD/CAM. These discs and blocks are made with various production techniques by adding materials such as lithium disilicate, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide, leucite and resin composite. The clinical situation in which these materials are to be used is determined by the mechanical, optical and biocompatibility of the material. In this review, recent literature support and material properties of high strength glass ceramics, which became popular recently, were examined.

Özet

Hastaların her geçen gün daha estetik ve hızlı tedavi beklentileri arttıkça, dijital diş hekimliğindeki gelişmeler de hızlanmıştır. Yeni restoratif meteryaller ile tek seansta üretimi mümkün kılan bilgisayar destekli tasarım ve üretim (CAD/CAM) teknolojisi, bu beklentileri karşılar hale gelmiştir. Dental porselenlerin temelini oluşturan feldspatik porselen ve lösitle güçlendirilmiş cam seramiklerin düşük bükülme dayanımı gibi dezavantajlarını elimine etmek amacıyla, seramik yapıya güçlendirici maddeler eklenmiştir. Bu durum tabaklama gerektirmeyen monolitik materyalleri geliştirmiştir. Böylece kor materyali gereksinimi ortadan kalkmıştır ve dolayısı ile porselen-kor bağlantısındaki sorunlar elimine edilmiştir. Sonuçta yapısal bütünlüğü daha güçlü, CAD/CAM üretimine uygun hazır disk ve bloklar kullanıma sunulmuştur. Bu disk ve bloklar yapıya; lityum disilikat, zirkonyum oksit, aluminyum oksit, lösit ve rezin kompozit gibi maddeler eklenerek çeşitli üretim teknikleriyle üretilmektedirler. Bu materyallerin hangi klinik durumlarda tercih edileceği ise; materyalin mekanik, optik ve biyouyumluluk özelliğine göre belirlenmektedir. Bu derlemede ise son zamanlarda popüler hale gelen yüksek dayanımlı cam seramiklerin güncel literatür desteği ile materyal özellikleri incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DENİZ, D., AKTAŞ, G., GÜNCÜ, B., CANAY, R. Ş. (2019). CAD/CAM high strength glass ceramics. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 224–230. https://ajindex.com/articles/145545

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Lebon N, Tapei L, Duret F, Attal JP. Understanding dental CAD/CAM for restorations- dental milling machines from a mechanical engineering viewpoint. Part A: chairside milling machines. Int J Comput Dent 2016; 19(1): 45- 62
  2. El- Meliegy E, van Noort R
  3. History, Market and Classification of Bioceramics, Part I Introduction to Medical Ceramics. Glasses and Glass Ceramics for Medikal Applications. New York: Springer, 2012. p.3-14
  4. Denry I, Kelly JR. Emerging ceramic based materials for dentistry. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 1235-1242
  5. Belli R, et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 1: Measurement of elastic contants and microstructural characterization. Dent Mater 2017; 33(1): 84-98
  6. Wendler M, et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 2: Flexural strength testing. Dent Mater 2017; 33(1): 99-109
  7. Anusavice KJ. Chapter 18 Dental ceramics. Part 4: Indirect Restorative Materials. Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials. St. Louis: Elsevier, 2013. p.418-474
  8. Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 2016; 32(7): 908-914
  9. Guess PC, Selz CF, Voulgarakis A, Stampf S, Stappert CF. Prospective clinical study of press-ceramic overlap and full veneer restorations: 7-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2014; 27(4): 355-358
  10. Sartori N, et al. CAD/CAM High Strength Glass- Ceramics. Quintessence of Dental Tecnology. 2015; 38: 39-54
  11. Höland W, Schweiger M, Frank M, Rheinberger V. A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress 2 and the IPS Empress glass-ceramics. J Biomed Mater Re. 2000; 53(4): 297-303
  12. Schultheis S, Strub JR, Gerds TA, Guess PC. Monolithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate versus metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17(5): 1407-1413
  13. Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Young H, Jones J, Gibbs C. Clinical performance of a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17(4): 469-475
  14. Valenti M, Valenti A. Retrospective survival analysis of 261 lithium disilicate crowns in a private general practice. Quintessence Int 2009; 40(7): 573-579
  15. Marquardt P, Strub JR. Survival rates of IPS empress 2 all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures: results of a 5-year prospective clinical study. Quintessence Int 2006; 37(4): 253-259
  16. Teichmann M, Göckler F, Weber V, Yıldırım M, Wolfart S, et al. Ten-year