SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2007 / Cilt: 2007 Sayı: 2

FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ertuğrul Ercan
Doç. Dr. Ali Erdemir
Yrd. Doç. Dr. Yahya Orçun Zorba
Dt. Mehmet Dallı
Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2007-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗

Abstract

-

Özet

Bu çal man namac ;haz rlanan II. s n f kavitelere uygulanan posterior restoratif materyallerin k r lma dayan kl l klar n nde8erlendirilmesidir

🔖

Cite This Article

Ercan, Y. D. D. E., Erdemir, D. D. A., Zorba, Y. D. D. Y. O., Dallı, D. M. (2007). FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 2007 Sayı: 2, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/1454548

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (46)

  1. Kitty MY, Stephen HY. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. JADA 1997; 128: 1088-96.
  2. Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement, with early finishing and water storage. Dent Mater 2004;20:3–11.
  3. Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Quagliatto PS, Soares CJ. The influence of the cavity preparation design on marginal accuracy of laboratory-processed resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2007,Bas mda
  4. Kahler B, Kotousov A, Borkowski K. On fracture resistance of restored teeth. Key Engineering Materials Vol. 2005;245-51.
  5. Y lmaz EÖ, Ulusoy N. Farkl yöntemlerle haz rlanan s n f mikros z nt s n n de8erlendirilmesi. A.Ü. Di Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32;171-80. 6- Nalçac A, Ulusoy N. Farkl
  6. polimerizasyon zamanlar n n
  7. rezinlerin yüzey sertli8i üzerine etkileri. A.Ü. Di
  8. Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32; 79-84,
  9. Manhart W, Chen HY, Hickel R. The suitable of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132: 639-45.
  10. Altun C, Kabalay U, Güven G, Ba ak F, Akbulut E, pediatrik di yöntemlerinin restoratif materyalin polimerizasyon büzülmesi üzerine etkileri. Gülhane T p Derg 2005; 47: 127-31.
  11. Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J 1991;41:25–32.
  12. Ritter AV. Posterior resin-based composite restorations: clinical recommendations for optimal success. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13:88–99.
  13. Cho L, Song H, Koak J, Heo S. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: effect of variations in preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:388– 95.
  14. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:147–53.
  15. Koran P, Kürschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998;10: 17- 22.
  16. Pyk N, Méjare I, Tunnel restorations in general practice. Influence of some clinical variables on the success rate, Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57: 195– 200.
  17. Almqusit TC, Cowan RD, Lambert RL. Conservative amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:524-8.
  18. Nordbo H, Leirskar J, van der Fehr FR. Saucer- shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: Observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 1998;29:5-11.
  19. Ellis SG, McCord JF, Burke FJ. Predisposing and contributing factor for complete and incomplete tooth fractures. Dent Update 1999;26: 150-2
  20. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations.J Prosthet Dent 1980;43: 419-22.
  21. Houpt M, Fuks A, Eidelman E. Direct bonded Class I Quintessence Int 1994;25:155-9.
  22. Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR. Saucer- shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: three-year results.1: J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:155-9.
  23. Jinks GM. Fluoride-impregnated cements and their effect on the activity of interproximal caries. J Dent Child 1963;30: 87-92.
  24. Tveit AB, Espelid I, Skodje F. Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway. Int Dent J 1999;49:165–72.
  25. Sundberg H, Mejare I, Espelid I, Tveit AB. Swedish dentists’ decisions on preparation techniques and restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:135–41
  26. Wagnild GW, Mueller KI. Restoration of the endodontically treated teeth. Pathways of the Pulp 8th ed. Mosby Inc. St Louis, USA, 2002: 765-795.
  27. Reeh ES, Douglass WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1540-4.
  28. Gutmann JL The dentin-root complex: Anatomic and biologic coniderations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 458-67.
  29. Potashnick SR, Weine FS, Strauss S. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Endodontic Therapy 4th ed. Mosby Inc, St Louis, USA, 1989: 653-98.
  30. Hernandez R, Bader S, Boston D, Trope M. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with new generation dentine bonding systems. Int Endod J 1994; 27: 281-4.
  31. Erdemir A, Eldeniz AU, Belli S. Farkl restorasyon materyalleri ile restore edilmi endodontik tedavili di lerin k r lma dirençlerinin in vitro incelenmesi. A. Ü. Di Hek Fak Derg 2004;14: 41-9.
  32. Lin CL, Chang CH, Ko CC. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto- mesh finite element approach. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:576–85.
  33. Svaördström G. Mini preparationer for dagens kariessituation och material utbud. Odontologi 91. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1991.p. 67-79.
  34. Kinomoto Y, Inoue Y, Ebisu S. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Dent. 2004;17:253-6.
  35. Horsted-Bindslev P, Heyde-Petersen B, Simonsen P, Baelum V. Tunnel or saucer-shaped restorations: a survival analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9:233-8.
  36. Ercan E, Dülgergil ÇT, Y ld r m I, Dall M. Tünel restorasyonlar n daimi di lerdeki ba ar s: 3 y ll k takip çal mas. ADO Klinik Bilimleri Derg. Bas mda
  37. Denehy GE, Torney DL. Internal enamel reinforcement through micromechanical bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:171–5.
  38. Eakle WS, Staninec M. Effect of bonded gold inlays on fracture resistance of teeth. Quintessence Int 1992;23:421-5.
  39. Jagadish S, Yogesh BG. Fracture resistance of teeth with class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations. Oper Dent 1990;15:42-7. Yaz?@ma Adresi: Ertu8rul ERCAN
  40. K r kkale Üniversitesi
  41. Di Hekimli8i Fakültesi
  42. Di Hastal klar ve Tedavisi AD 71200, K r kkale.
  43. Tel: 0 3182244927 Faks: 0 3182243618
  44. e-mail: [email protected]
  45. Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32; 79-84,
  46. Ercan E, Dülgergil ÇT, Y ld r m I, Dall M. Tünel restorasyonlar n daimi di lerdeki ba ar s: 3 y ll k takip çal mas. ADO Klinik Bilimleri Derg. Bas mda