SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2026 / Cilt: 30 Sayı: 2

CONGENITAL DENTAL ANOMALIES IN THE PRIMARY DENTITION

Gülser Kılınç0000-0002-7422-0482
Müjdet Çetin0000-0001-6077-5578
Pages
247–253
Publication Date
2020-04-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Anahtar kelimeler : Diş anomalileri, hiperdonti, hipodonti, süt dişi

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of congenital anomalies in the primary dentition in preschool children populations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Data pertaining to a total of 935 children (487 boys and 448 girls) in the 2–5 year age-group who visited the Department of Pedodontics Clinic at the Dokuz Eylul Univeristy Hospital, Izmir, Turkey between january 01, 2016, and december 31, 2017 were all panoramic radiographs and photograph restrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Anahtar kelimeler : Diş anomalileri, hiperdonti, hipodonti, süt dişi
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2016 · 9 hasta
⚙️Variables:Hyperdontia · hypodontia · primary tooth

Özet

Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of congenital anomalies in the primary dentition in preschool children populations. Material and Methods: Data pertaining to a total of 935 children (487 boys and 448 girls) in the 2–5 year age-group who visited the Department of Pedodontics Clinic at the Dokuz Eylul Univeristy Hospital, Izmir, Turkey between january 01, 2016, and december 31, 2017 were all panoramic radiographs and photograph restrospectively analyzed. The presence of hypodontia, hyperdontia (supplemental and mesiodens), and double teeth (fusion and gemination) were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test and chi-square test. Results: Dental anomalies were found in 2.7% of children. Double teeth were the most frequently observed anomaly (1.4%), followed by hyperdontia (0.9%) and hypodontia (0.5%). Unilateral missing teeth were more frequently observed than bilateral missing teeth. All supernumerary teeth were located in the primary maxillary incisor area. Dental anomalies were significantly more frequent (p=0.001) in boys (1.6%, n=15) as compared to that in girls (1.1%, n=10). Radiographic examination showed 36.0% of the patients (9 children) had anomalies in the permanent dentition. Conclusions : Identification of primary dental anomalies at an early age is of great importance as it may help prevent malocclusions as well as functional and psychological problems. Anomalies in primary dentition exhibited a correlation with anomalies in permanent dentition. Keywords : Hyperdontia , hypodontia, primary tooth, tooth abnormalities. Süt Dişi Dentisyonunda Görülen Diş Anomaliler ÖZ Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, okul öncesi çocukların süt dişinde görülen konjenital dental anomali prevalansını saptamaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem : İzmir Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Çocuk diş kliniğine 01.01.2016-31.12.2017 tarihleri arasında gelen ve 2-5 yaş aralığında olan 935 (487 erkek ve 448 kız) hastanın panoromik filmleri ve fotoğrafları retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Hipodonti, hiperdonti (supplemental, meziodens), ve ikiz diş (füzyon, geminasyon) varlığı tespit edilmiştir. Verilerin istatistik analizinde Fisher's exact test ve ki-kare testi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Dental anomali oranı %2.7 olarak saptanmıştır. En yaygın görülen diş anomalisi ikiz diş(%1.4), olarak bulunmuş olup, bunu hiperdonti(%0.9) ve hipodonti (%0.5) izlemiştir. Tek taraflı hipodonti çift taraflıdan daha fazla görülmüştür. Süt dişi dentisyonunda de görülen tüm supernumerer dişler üst çene keser dişler bölgesindedir. Diş anomalileri erkeklerde (%1.6, n=15), kızlardan (1.1%, n=10) daha fazla görülmüş olup, fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (p=0.001) . Radyolojik inceleme sonucunda süt dişinde diş anomalisi görülen hastaların %36.0”sının(9 hasta) daimi dişlerinde de görülmüştür. Sonuç: Süt dişi diş anomalilerin erken yaşta tespit edilmesi hastanın okluzyon bozukluklarının önlenmesinin yanı sıra, psikolojik ve fonksiyonel problemlerinin önlenmesinde de oldukça önemlidir. Ayrıca süt dişi dentisyonunda görülen diş anomalileri daimi dentisyonu da etkilemektedir. Anahtar kelimeler : Diş anomalileri, hiperdonti, hipodonti, süt dişi

🔖

Cite This Article

Kılınç, G., Çetin, M. (2020). CONGENITAL DENTAL ANOMALIES IN THE PRIMARY DENTITION. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 2, 247–253. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.599421

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Chen YH. Cheng NC, Wang YB, Yang CY. Prevalence of congenital dental anomalies in the primary dentition in Taiwan. Pediatr Dent 2010; 3: 525-9.
  2. Deolia SG, Chhabra C, Chhabra KG, Kalghatgi S, Khandelwal N. Dental anomalies of the deciduous dentition among Indian children: A survey from Jodhpur, Rajasthan. India. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2015; 33: 111-5.
  3. Gomes RR, Fonseca JA, Paula LM, Acevedo AC, Mestrinho HD. Dental anomalies in primary dentition and their corresponding permanent teeth. Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 1361-7.
  4. Kapdan A, Kustarci A, Buldur B, Arslan D, Kapdan A. Dental anomalies in the primary dentition of Turkish children. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 178-83.
  5. Mukhopadhyay S, Mitra S. Anomalies in primary dentition: Their distribution and correlation with permanent dentition. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2014; 5: 139-43.
  6. Bruce C, Manning-Cox G, Stanback-Fryer C, Banks K, Gilliam M. A radiographic survey of dental anomalies in Black pediatric patients. NDA J 1994; 45: 6-13.
  7. Kramer PT, Feldens CA, Ferreira SH, Spiguel MH, Feldens EG. Dental anomalies and associated factors in 2- to 5-year- old Brazilian children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008; 18: 434-40.
  8. Koparal M, Ünsal HY, Alan HT, Yalçın M, Ege B, Gülsün B. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde yedi farklı dental anomalinin görülme sıklığı. Selcuk Dent J 2018; 5: 135-41.
  9. Anthonappa RP, King NM, Rabie AB. Aetiology of supernumerary teeth: A literature review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2013; 14; 279-88.
  10. Koszowski R, Waśkowska J, Kucharski G, Śmieszek-Wilczewska J. Double teeth: evaluation of 10-years of clinical material. Cent Eur J Med 2014; 9: 254-63.
  11. Srivastava N, Srivastava V. An inverted supernumerary tooth: Report of case. ASDC J Dent Child 2001; 68: 61-2.
  12. Venkataraghavan K, Anantharaj A, Nihal NK. Supplemental primary tooth: A review report of a rare occurrence. IJCDS 2011; 2: 48-51.
  13. Wu CV, Lin YT, Lin YT. Double primary teeth in children under 17 years old and their correlation with permanent successors. Chang Gung Med J 2010; 33: 188-92.
  14. Bayram M, Yıldırım M, Köse A, Seymen F. Pedodonti anabilim dalında başlangıç muayenesinde alınan panoromik radyografilerin değerlendirilmesi. İst Uni Diş Hek Fak Derg 2011;45:41-7.
  15. Hamasha AA, Al-Khateeb T. Prevalence of fused and geminated teeth in Jordanian adults, Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 556-9.
  16. Sekerci AE, Sisman Y, Yasa Y, Sahman H, Ekizer A. Prevalence of fusion and gemination in permanent theeth in Cappadocia region in Turkey. Pakistan Oral Dent J 2011; 31: 15-20.
  17. Koch G, Paulsen S. Pediatric Dentistry: A Clinical Approach. 3 ed. Munksgaard, Copenhagen:1994. p. 275-292.
  18. Carvalho JC, Vinker F, Declerck D. Malocclusion, dental injuries and dental anomalies in the primary dentition of Belgian children. Int J Paediatr Dent 1998; 8: 137-41.
  19. Yonezu T, Hayashi Y, Sasaki J, Machida Y. Prevalence of congenital dental anomalies of the deciduous dentition in Japanese children. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1997;38: 27-32.
  20. Magnusson TE, Hypodontia, hyperdontia, and double formation of primary teeth in Iceland. An epidemiological study. Acta Odontol Scand 1984; 42: 137-9.
  21. Whittington BR, Durward CS. Survey of anomalies in primary teeth and their correlation with the permanent dentition. N Z Dent J 1996; 92: 4-8.
  22. King NM, Tongkoom S, Wong HM. Morphological and Numerical Characteristics of the Southern Chinese Dentitions. Part III: Anomalies in the Primary Dentition. Open Anthropol J 2010; 3: 25-36.
  23. Miyoshi S, Tanaka S, Kunimatsu H, Murakami Y, Fukami Y, Fujisawa S. An epidemiological study of supernumerary primary teeth in Japanese children: A review of racial diff erences in the prevalence. Oral Dis 2000; 6: 99-102.
  24. Kim SG, Lee SH. Mesiodens: A clinical and radiographic study. J Dent Child (Chic) 2003; 70: 58-60.
  25. Järvinen S, Lehtinen L., Supernumerary and congenitally missing primary teeth in Finnish children. Acta Odont Scand 1981; 39: 83-6.
  26. Jones ML, Mourino AP, Bowden TA. Evaluation of occlusion, trauma, and dental anomalies in African-American children of metropolitan Headstart programs. J Clin Pediat Dent 1993; 18: 51-4.
  27. Knezevic S, Travan Z, Tarle J, Sutalo B, Janković B, Ciglar I. Double tooth. Coll Antropol 2002; 26: 66-72.
  28. Kılınç G, Çetin M. Süt dişlerinde Süpernumerer diş (Suplemental diş) ve ikiz diş: İki olgu sunumu. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2016;Supl 15:26-30.
  29. Aydinbelge M, Sekerci1 AE, Caliskan S, H Gumus H, Y Sisman Y, Cantekin K. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Double Teeth in Primary Dentition and Associated Anomalies in the Permanent Successors. Niger J Clin Pract 2017; 20:847-51.
  30. Aguiló L, Gandia JL, Cibrian R, Catala M. Primary double teeth. A retrospective clinical study of their morphological characteristics and associated anomalies. Int J Paediatr Dent 1999; 9: 175-83.
  31. Chen YH. Cheng NC, Wang YB, Yang CY. Prevalence of congenital dental anomalies in the primary dentition in Taiwan. Pediatr Dent 2010; 3: 525-9.
  32. Kapdan A, Kustarci A, Buldur B, Arslan D, Kapdan A. Dental anomalies in the primary dentition of Turkish children. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 178-83.