Journals / art / 2020 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Demodex Species Frequency and Risk Factors in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Journal
art
Pages
376–384
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although Demodex mite presence was 3.5-fold higher in RA patients, the rate of Demodex infestation was similar to that of healthy controls.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to investigate the presence of Demodex species in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, to identify the risk factors for developing Demodex infestation, and to determine the effect of immunosuppressant drugs on Demodex mite infestations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: The study included 93 RA patients (16 males, 77 females; mean age 53.3±11.3 years; range, 27 to 83 years) and 76 healthy controls (19 males, 57 females; mean age 50.3±13.9 years; range, 19 to 86 years).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although Demodex mite presence was 3.5-fold higher in RA patients, the rate of Demodex infestation was similar to that of healthy controls.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the presence of Demodex species in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, to identify the risk factors for developing Demodex infestation, and to determine the effect of immunosuppressant drugs on Demodex mite infestations. Patients and methods: The study included 93 RA patients (16 males, 77 females; mean age 53.3±11.3 years; range, 27 to 83 years) and 76 healthy controls (19 males, 57 females; mean age 50.3±13.9 years; range, 19 to 86 years). Specimens were collected from face skin by using standardized surface skin biopsy. Demodex infestation was considered for ≥5 living parasites/cm2 of skin while Demodex mite presence was defined as any Demodex larvae, adults, or eggs found in the specimen. Results: The frequencies of Demodex mite presence were 44% for the RA patients and 15.7% for the healthy controls (p<0.001). The rates of Demodex infestation were similar between the two groups (18.3% versus 7.9%, p=0.054). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding skin type, skin care, epilation, body washing, use of a moisturizer, personal towel use, the number of residents at home, or whether there were pets at home or in proximity. Itching in eyes was higher in RA patients, but the frequency of other skin symptoms was not different from healthy controls. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the diagnosis of RA was an independent risk factor for Demodex mite presence in this study population. Disease activity and duration, use of corticosteroids, conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biological DMARDs were not effective factors on Demodex mite presence in RA patients. Conclusion: Although Demodex mite presence was 3.5-fold higher in RA patients, the rate of Demodex infestation was similar to that of healthy controls.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZISIZ, H., ÇEKİN, Y., SEZER, İ., BOSTAN, F., KOÇLAR, F. G. (2020). Demodex Species Frequency and Risk Factors in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. art, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 376–384. https://ajindex.com/articles/144890

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Litwin D, Chen W, Dzika E, Korycinska J. Human Permanent Ectoparasites; Recent Advances on Biology and Clinical Significance of Demodex Mites: Narrative Review Article. Iran J Parasitol 2017;12:12-21.
  2. Desch C, Nutting WB. Demodex folliculorum (Simon) and D. brevis akbulatova of man: redescription and reevaluation. J Parasitol 1972;58:169-77.
  3. Elston CA, Elston DM. Demodex mites. Clin Dermatol 2014;32:739-43.
  4. Lacey N, Ní Raghallaigh S, Powell FC. Demodex mites- -commensals, parasites or mutualistic organisms? Dermatology 2011;222:128-30.
  5. Lacey N, Russell-Hallinan A, Powell FC. Study of demodex mites: Challenges and solutions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016;30:764-75.
  6. Kosik-Bogacka DI, Lanocha N, Lanocha A, Czepita D, Grobelny A, Zdziarska B, et al. Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis in healthy and immunocompromised patients. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2013;20:159-63.
  7. Seyhan ME, Karincao¤lu Y, Bayram N, Aycan O, Kuku I. Density of Demodex folliculorum in haematological malignancies. J Int Med Res 2004;32:411-5.
  8. Kaya OA, Akkucuk S, Ilhan G, Guneri CO, Mumcuoglu K. The Importance of Demodex Mites (Acari: Demodicidae) in Patients With Sickle Cell Anemia. J Med Entomol 2019;56:599-602.
  9. Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2010;376:1094-108.
  10. Ciftci IH, Dundar U, Cetinkaya Z, Kulac M, Kiyildi N, Turel A, et al. Demodex folliculorum in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Parasitologica 2007;52:70-3.
  11. Garbacewicz A, Jaworski J, Grytner-Ziecina B. Demodex mite infestation in patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Parasitol 2012;57:99-100.
  12. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1580-8. Akbulatova L. Demodicidosis of man. Vestn Dermatol Venereol 1963;38:34-42.
  13. Forton F, Seys B. Density of Demodex folliculorum in rosacea: a case-control study using standardized skinsurface biopsy. Br J Dermatol 1993;128:650-9.
  14. Aşkin U, Seçkin D. Comparison of the two techniques for measurement of the density of Demodex folliculorum: standardized skin surface biopsy and direct microscopic examination. Br J Dermatol 2010;162:1124-6.
  15. Sakuntabhai A, Timpatanapong P. Topical steroid induced chronic demodicidosis. J Med Assoc Thai 1991;74:116-9.
  16. Forton F, Song M. Limitations of standardized skin surface biopsy in measurement of the density of Dem