Journals / ALKÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Özel Sayı

Isotopic Yields in Peripheral Heavy-Ion Collisions

-

Pages
36–39
Publication Date
2019-03-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results are in agreement with recent findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We have calculated production cross sections and isotopic distributions of the projectile fragments emerging from the reactions 112,124 Sn + 112,124 Sn at 50 MeV/nucleon incident beam energy, performed at the cyclotron of Michigan State University ( MSU).
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is shown that a significant reduction of the symmetry energy term is found necessary to reproduce experimental data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results are in agreement with recent findings.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:isotopic yield · multifragmentation · projectile fragments

Abstract

We have calculated production cross sections and isotopic distributions of the projectile fragments emerging from the reactions 112,124 Sn + 112,124 Sn at 50 MeV/nucleon incident beam energy, performed at the cyclotron of Michigan State University ( MSU). For the interpretation of the data, we carried out the calculations within the statistical multifragmentation model (SMM). The possible modification of symmetry energy parameter, in the multifragmentation region at the low density freeze-out has been studied. It is shown that a significant reduction of the symmetry energy term is found necessary to reproduce experimental data. The results are in agreement with recent findings.

Özet

-

🔖

Cite This Article

Gülbeyaz, F. B., Büyükçizmeci, N., Oğul, R. (2019). Isotopic Yields in Peripheral Heavy-Ion Collisions. ALKÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Özel Sayı, 36–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/1448118

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. T. X. Liu et al, Phys. Rev. C 76, 034603 (2007).
  2. J. P. Bondorf, A. S. Botvina, et al, Phys. Rep. 257, 133 (1995).
  3. R. Ogul, A. S. Botvina, et al, Phys. Rev. C 83, 024608 (2011).
  4. R. Ogul, et al, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 36, 115106 (2009).
  5. Buyukcizmeci, et al, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 39, 115102 (2012).
  6. Ogul, et al, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28:18, (2017).
  7. Le F`evre et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 162701 (2005).
  8. Ono et al, Phys. Rev. C 68, 051601 (2003).