Journals / Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches / 2023 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Comparison of Recovery Knowledge Levels of Individual and Team Athletes

Bireysel ve Takım Sporcularının Toparlanma Bilgi Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması

Hamza Budak(AKSARAY UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF COACH TRAINING, COACH TRAINING PR.)0000-0002-8482-6920
Pages
34–47
Publication Date
2023-06-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it can be said that there is no significant difference between the Sports Recovery Knowledge Test levels of individual and team athletes in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The knowledge level of the athletes about the recovery methods after exercise and the intervals of application of these methods are very important for their next sportive performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 227 participants, 115 individual athletes and 112 team athletes were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it can be said that there is no significant difference between the Sports Recovery Knowledge Test levels of individual and team athletes in this study.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bireysel sporcular · Takım sporcuları · Toparlanma bilgi düzeyi.

Abstract

The knowledge level of the athletes about the recovery methods after exercise and the intervals of application of these methods are very important for their next sportive performance. This study was conducted to compare and evaluate the knowledge levels and opinions of individual and team athletes about recovery methods after exercise. A total of 227 participants, 115 individual athletes and 112 team athletes were included in the study. Sports Recovery Knowledge Test (SRKT) scale developed by Aydemir et al. (2020) determined the participants' demographic characteristics, habits, level of knowledge and views on recovery methods. In the analysis of the data, in addition to descriptive statistics, t-tests and ANOVA tests, which are parametric tests, were used to determine the difference between the groups in normally distributed data. In terms of the type of sports branch, it was determined that 6 (5.2%) of the individual athletes had a weak level of SRKT, 84 (73.1%) were at a moderate level and 25 (21.7%) were at a good level. It was determined that 5 (4.5%) of these values were weak, 86 (76.7%) moderate and 21 (18.8%) good in team athletes. It was determined that the SRKT score was 53.22 points in individual athletes and 54.04 points in team athletes, and there was no statistically significant difference between them (p>0.05). As a result, it can be said that there is no significant difference between the Sports Recovery Knowledge Test levels of individual and team athletes in this study.

Özet

Sporcuların egzersiz sonrası gerçekleştirilen toparlanma yöntemleri hakkındaki bilgi düzeyleri ve bu yöntemleri uygulama aralıkları bir sonraki sportif performans açısından oldukça önem kazanmaktadır. Bu çalışma, bireysel ve takım sporcularının egzersiz sonrası toparlanma yöntemleri hakkındaki bilgi düzeylerini ve görüşlerini karşılaştırmak ve değerlendirmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmaya 115 bireysel sporcu ve 112 takım sporcusu olmak üzere toplam 227 katılımcı dâhil edilmiştir. Veri toplama aracı olarak katılımcıların demografik özelliklerini, alışkanlıklarını, bilgi düzeylerini ve toparlanma yöntemleri hakkındaki görüşlerini belirlemek için Aydemir ve arkadaşları (2020) tarafından geliştirilen Sporda Toparlanma Bilgi Testi (STBT) ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistiklere ek olarak normal dağılım gösteren verilerde gruplar arasındaki farkı belirlemek için parametrik testlerden t-testleri ve ANOVA testleri kullanılmıştır. Spor branşı türü bakımından STBT düzeyinin bireysel sporcularda 6’sının (% 5,2) zayıf, 84’ünün (% 73,1) orta ve 25’inin (% 21,7) iyi düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu değerler takım sporcularında 5’inin (% 4,5) zayıf, 86’sının (% 76,7) orta ve 21’inin ise (% 18,8) iyi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bireysel sporcularda STBT puanının 53,22 puan, takım sporcularında ise 54,04 puan olduğu ve aralarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olmadığı görülmüştür (p>0.05). Sonuç olarak bu çalışmada bireysel ve takım sporcularının Sporda Toparlanma Bilgi Testi düzeyleri arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığı söylenebilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Budak, H. (2023). Comparison of Recovery Knowledge Levels of Individual and Team Athletes. Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 34–47. https://doi.org/10.54152/asujshr.1288115

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Abaidia, A. E., Lamblin, J., Delecroix, B., Leduc, C., Mccall, A., & Dupont, G. (2017). Recovery from exercise induced muscle damage: cold water immersion versus whole-body cryotherapy. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(3), 402-409.
  2. Ament, W., & Verkerke, G. J. (2009). Exercise and fatigue. Sports Medicine, 39(5), 389-422.
  3. Armstrong, L. E., & Johnson, E. C. (2018). Water intake, water balance, and the elusive daily water requirement. Nutrients, 10(12), 1928-1953.
  4. Aydemir, M., & Kolayiş, İ. E. (2022). Futbolcuların kullandığı toparlanma teknikleri, toparlanma ile ilgili görüşleri ve toparlanma bilgi düzeylerinin incelenmesi: tanımlayıcı araştırma. Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(2), 150-159. Aydemir, M., Mirzeoğlu, A. D., & Kolayiş, İ. E. (2020). Sporda toparlanma bilgi testi: geçerlilik ve güvenirlilik çalışması. Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(1), 40-48.
  5. Bali, A. (2015). Psychological factors affecting sports performance. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health, 1(6), 92-95.
  6. Baydil, B., Gürses, V. V., & Koç, M. C. (2017). Masajın bazı toparlanma parametrelerine etkisi. Sportif Bakış: Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1, 63-69.
  7. Cambron, J. A., Dexheimer, J., & Swenson, R. (2007). Side effects of massage therapy. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 13(8), 793-796.
  8. Cheatham, S. W., & Stull, K. R. (2018). Comparison of three different density type foam rollers on knee range of motion and pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 13(3), 474-481.
  9. Cockburn, E., Hayes, P. R., & French, D. N. (2008). Acute milkbased protein-CHO supplementation attenuates exercise-induced muscle damage. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 33(4), 775-783.
  10. Dupont, G., Nedelec, M., Mccal, A., & Berthonin, S. (2015). Football recovery strategies. Aspetar Sports Medicine Journal, 43(4), 20-27.
  11. Dupuy, O., Douzi, W., Theurot, D., Bosquet, L., & Dugué, B., (2018). An evidence-based approach for choosing post-exercise recovery techniques to reduce markers of muscle damage, soreness, fatigue, and inflammation: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Frontiers in Physiology, 9(403), 1-15.
  12. Gill, N. D., Beaven, C. M., & Cook, C. (2006). Effectiveness of postmatch recovery strategies in rugby players. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(3), 260-263.
  13. Glanville, K. M., & Hamlin, M. J. (2012). Positive effect of lower body compression garments on subsequent 40-kM cycling time trial performance. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 26(2), 480-486.
  14. Haff, G. G., & Triplett, N. T. (2015). Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Illinois: Human Kinetics. Hilbert, J. E., Sforzo, G. A., & Swensen, T. (2003). The effects of massage on delayed onset muscle soreness. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37(1), 72-75.
  15. Itoh, K., Ochi, H., & Kitakoji, H. (2008). Effects of tender point acupuncture on delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) – a pragmatic trial. Chinese Medicine, 3(14), 1-5.
  16. Kellmann, M., Bertollo, M., Bosquet, L., Brink, M., Coutts, A. J., & Duffield, R. (2018). Recovery and performance in sport: consensus statement. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 13(2), 240-245.
  17. Koizumi, K., Fujita, Y., Muramatsu, S., Manabe, M., Ito, M., & Nomura, J. (2011). Active recovery effects on local oxygenation level during intensive cycling bouts. Journal Sports, 29(9), 919-926. Nedelec, M., Mccall, A., & Carling, C. (2013). Recovery in soccer: part recovery strategies. Sports Medicine, 43(1), 9-22.
  18. Rey, E., Padrón-Cabo, A., Costa, P. B., & Barcala-Furelos, R. (2019). Effects of foam rolling as a recovery tool in professional soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 33(8), 2194-2201.
  19. Siegel, R., & Laursen, P. (2012). Keeping your cool: possible mechanisms for enhanced exercise performance in the heat with internal cooling methods. Sports Medicine, 42(2), 89- 98.
  20. Tessitore, A., Meeusen, R., & Cortis, C. (2007). Effects of different recovery interventions on anaerobic performances following preseason soccer training. The Journal of Strength Conditioning Research, 21(3), 745-750.
  21. Vaile, J. M., Gill, N. D., & Blazevich, A. J. (2007). The effect of contrast water therapy on symptoms of delayed onset muscle soreness. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 21(3), 697-702.
  22. Venter, R. E., Potgieter, J. R., & Barnard, J. G. (2009). The use of recovery modalities by elite South African team athletes. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation, 31(1), 133-145.
  23. Walker, I. J., & Nordin, S. M. (2010). Performance anxiety experiences of professional ballet dancers: the importance of control. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 14(4), 133-145.
  24. Wiewelhove, T., Döweling, A., Schneider, C., Hottenrott, L., Meyer, T., Kellmann, M., & Ferrauti, A. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery. Frontiers in Physiology, 10(376), 1-15.
  25. Wilcock, I. M., Cronin, J. B., & Hing, W. A., (2006). Water immersion: does it enhance recovery from exercise? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 1(3), 195-206.