Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 5

Provision of primary NIST traceability to support vapor phase mercuryemissions monitoring of combustion sources using isotope dilutioninductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Pages
909–919
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The sorbent trapping method in contrast, yielded expanded uncertainties of approximately 1%relative at all sampling points, with an LOQ of 0.001μg/m3.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Primary mercury gas standards, traceable to the SI, have been developed which can be used to underpin a NISTtraceability framework for the calibration of vapor phase continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The standard, termed the NIST Prime (NP) was certified at selected setpoints in the range 0.25μg/m3to 38μg/m3by isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry(ID-ICP-MS) using two alternative approaches, based on directly coupled gas sampling, and activated carbonsorbent trapping.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The sorbent trapping method in contrast, yielded expanded uncertainties of approximately 1%relative at all sampling points, with an LOQ of 0.001μg/m3.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Primary mercury gas standards, traceable to the SI, have been developed which can be used to underpin a NISTtraceability framework for the calibration of vapor phase continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS). A gasstandard, which is based on a commercial gas generator, has been certified for gaseous elemental mercury outputat specified generator output set points. The standard, termed the NIST Prime (NP) was certified at selected setpoints in the range 0.25μg/m3to 38μg/m3by isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry(ID-ICP-MS) using two alternative approaches, based on directly coupled gas sampling, and activated carbonsorbent trapping. Both approaches have been used to provide NIST traceability for electric utility mercury CEMS.The directly coupled method yielded expanded measurement uncertainties ranging from approximately 5.5%relative at 0.5μg/m3, to approximately 1% relative at 38μg/m3, and an estimated limit of quantitation (LOQ) of0.06μg/m3. The sorbent trapping method in contrast, yielded expanded uncertainties of approximately 1%relative at all sampling points, with an LOQ of 0.001μg/m3.

🔖

Cite This Article

LONG, S. E., NORRİS, J. E., CARNEY, J., RYAN, J. V. (2020). Provision of primary NIST traceability to support vapor phase mercuryemissions monitoring of combustion sources using isotope dilutioninductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 5, 909–919. https://ajindex.com/articles/144449

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. BIPM, 2008. International Vocabulary of Metrology - Basic and General Concepts andAssociated Terms, VIM, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, BureauInternational des Poids et Mesures. (accessed June 2019).https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html.
  2. Brown, R.J.C., Brown, A.S., 2008. Accurate calibration of mercury vapour measurements.Analyst 133, 1611–1618.
  3. Brown, R.J.C., Brown, A.S., Corns, W.T., Stockwell, P.B., 2008a. Accurate calibration ofmercury indicators for occupational exposure measurements using a dynamic mer-cury vapour generator. Instrum. Sci. Technol. 6, 611–622.
  4. Brown, A.S., Brown, R.J.C., Corns, W.T., Stockwell, P.B., 2008b. Establishing SI trace-ability for measurements of mercury vapour. Analyst 133, 946–953.
  5. Christopher, S.J., Long, S.E., Rearick, M.S., Fassett, J.D., 2001. Development of highaccuracy vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and itsapplication to the certification of mercury in Standard Reference Materials. Anal.Chem. 73, 2190–2199.
  6. Dumarey, R., Brown, R.J.C., Corns, W.T., Brown, A.S., Stockwell, P.B., 2010. Elementalmercury vapour in air: the origins and validation of the‘Dumarey equation’de-scribing the mass concentration at saturation. Accred Qual. Assur. 15, 409–414. EIA, 2019. US Electricity Generation by Energy Source. October 2019. US EnergyInformation Administration (accessed January 2020).https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/.
  7. Ent, H., Van Andel, I., Heemskerk, M., Van Otterloo, P., Bavius, W., Baldan, A., Horvat,M., Brown, R.J.C., Quetel, C.R., 2014. A gravimetric approach to providing SI tra-ceability for concentration measurement results of mercury vapor at ambient airlevels. Meas. Sci. Technol. 25 (1–11), 115801. EPA, 1997. Mercury Study Report to Congress. Volume II: an Inventory of AnthropogenicMercury Emissions in the United States. US Environmental Protection Agency,Technical Report, EPA-452/R-96-001b. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,Washington DC. EPA, 2012. Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,Washington D.C (accessed June 2019).https://www.epa.gov/mats. EPA, 2017. Method 30B: Determination of Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions fromCoal-Fired Combustion Sources Using Carbon Sorbent Traps. (accessed June 2019).https://www.epa.gov/emc/method-30b-mercury-sorbent-trap-procedure. FEDREG, 2005. Standards of Performance for New and Existing Stationary Sources:Electric Utility Steam Generating Units. Final Rule May 18, 2005,
  8. Part II, F