Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 5

Source and health risk apportionment for PM2.5collected in Sha-Lu area,Taiwan

Pages
851–858
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Most importantly, it provides valuable information formaking environmental management decision.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Many investigations have found that the effects of chemical composition of PM2.5plays an important role onhuman health.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study develops an air pollution source reduction strategy that apportions health risk amongdifferent emission sources by combining the receptor model and human health risk assessment technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Most importantly, it provides valuable information formaking environmental management decision.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Many investigations have found that the effects of chemical composition of PM2.5plays an important role onhuman health. This study develops an air pollution source reduction strategy that apportions health risk amongdifferent emission sources by combining the receptor model and human health risk assessment technique. Thegoal is to identify emission source of PM2.5that have the greatest impact on human health. We establish a PM2.5sampling station in Sha-Lu, Taiwan. Five PM2.5pollution sources were identified in this study. They are steelindustry, residual oil combustion, road dust and traffic, coal-fired power plant, and glass production industry.The results of health risk assessment indicated that the metal contributes the most cancer risk is arsenic, followedby hexavalent chromium. The emissions of these two metals are closely related to coal-fired power plant. Wesuggested that the power plants should use coal with a low As and Cr content of coal in order to reduce the healthrisk associated with exposure to PM2.5. The limitation of this study is that only a small fraction of compoundswas measured in the samples. However, this study demonstrates that an analysis of the degree to which emissionsources contribute to health risks is a useful technique. Most importantly, it provides valuable information formaking environmental management decision.

🔖

Cite This Article

TSAİ, P., LİN, M., YOUNG, L., HWANG, B., CHEN, Y., HSU, H. (2020). Source and health risk apportionment for PM2.5collected in Sha-Lu area,Taiwan. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 5, 851–858. https://ajindex.com/articles/144444

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Almeida, S.M., Lage, J., Fernández, B., Garcia, S., Reis, M.A., Chaves, P.C., 2015. Chemical characterization of atmospheric particles and source apportionment in thevicinity of a steelmaking industry. Sci. Total Environ. 521–522, 411–420.
  2. Cheng, M.T., Tsai, Y.I., 2000. Characterization of visibility and atmospheric aerosols inurban, suburban, and remote areas. Sci. Total Environ. 263, 101–114.
  3. Cheng, Y., Engling, G., He, K.B., Duan, F.K., Ma, Y.L., Du, Z.Y., Liu, J.M., Zheng, M.,Weber, R.J., 2013. Biomass burning contribution to Beijing aerosol. Atmos. Chem.Phys. 13, 7765–7781.
  4. Connell, D.P., Winter, S.E., Conrad, V.B., Kim, M., Crist, K., 2006. The Steubenvillecomprehensive air monitoring program (SCAMP): concentrations and solubilities ofPM2.5 trace elements and their implications for source apportionment and healthresearch. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 56, 1750–1766.
  5. Dall'Osto, M., Booth, M.J., Smith, W., Fisher, R., Harrison, R.M., 2008. A study of the sizedistributions and the chemical characterization of airborne particles in the vicinity ofa large integrated steelworks. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 42, 981–991.
  6. Darrow, L.A., Klein, M., Flanders, W.D., Mulholland, J.A., Tolbert, P.E., Strickland, M.J.,2014. Air pollution and acute respiratory infections among children 0-4 years of age:an 18-year time-series study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 180, 968–977.
  7. Das, R., Khezri, B., Srivastave, B., Datta, S., Sikdar, P.K., Webster, R.D., Wang, X., 2015.Trace element composition of PM2.5and PM10from Kolkata–a heavily pollutedIndian metropolis. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 6, 742–750.
  8. Deng, X., Zhang, F., Rui, W., Long, F., Wang, L., Feng, Z., Chen, D., Ding, W., 2013. PM2.5-induced oxidative stress triggers autophagy in human lung epithelial A549 cells.Toxicol. Vitro 27, 1762–1770. European Commission, 2014. Air quality Standards. Available at:http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm.
  9. Fan, Z.H., Shalat, S., Yu, C.Ho, Black, K., Lin, L., 2009. Characterization of HexavalentChromium Concentrations in Household Dust in Background Areas. NJDEP Divisionof Science and Research, Trenton, NJ Available at:http://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/35388/.
  10. Fang, G.C., Wu, Y.S., Chang, S.Y., Huang, S.H., Rau, J.Y., 2006. Size distributions ofambient air particles and enrichment factor analyses of metallic elements at TaichungHarbor near the Taiwan Strait. Atmos. Res. 81, 320–333.
  11. Feng, S., Gao, D., Liao, F., Zhou, F., Wang, X., 2016. The health effects of ambient PM2.5and p