Journals / Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research / 2026 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Exploring the Impact of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management Standard on Organizational Practices

Özkan Şahin(DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5341-1274
Hüseyn əsgərli(NAKHCHIVAN STATE UNIVERSITY)0009-0006-9465-1067
Pages
14–22
Publication Date
2025-06-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the adoption of the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI management system enables companies to manage AI applications within a secure and ethical framework while achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in their digital transformation processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the technical, operational, and strategic impacts of implementing the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Management System standard, which is a critical factor for companies adapting to the transformative effects of AI technologies in the business world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The framework provided by ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is also discussed in terms of its benefits in critical areas such as data security, operational efficiency, regulatory compliance and competitive advantage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the adoption of the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI management system enables companies to manage AI applications within a secure and ethical framework while achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in their digital transformation processes.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Artificial Intelligence · Management Systems · Iso42001:2023

Abstract

This paper examines the technical, operational, and strategic impacts of implementing the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Management System standard, which is a critical factor for companies adapting to the transformative effects of AI technologies in the business world. Aimed at ensuring the ethical and reliable governance of AI systems, this standard assists organizations in developing transparent, unbiased, fair and sustainable AI solutions. The framework provided by ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is also discussed in terms of its benefits in critical areas such as data security, operational efficiency, regulatory compliance and competitive advantage. In this context, it is emphasized that companies can adopt AI applications not only as a technical innovation but also as a strategic management element. The integration processes between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management System and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System are presented, highlighting how these two standards complement each other. An analysis is provided on how principles of information security, risk management, and transparency can be effectively implemented within AI systems. In conclusion, the adoption of the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI management system enables companies to manage AI applications within a secure and ethical framework while achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in their digital transformation processes.

Özet

This paper examines the technical, operational, and strategic impacts of implementing the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Management System standard, which is a critical factor for companies adapting to the transformative effects of AI technologies in the business world. Aimed at ensuring the ethical and reliable governance of AI systems, this standard assists organizations in developing transparent, unbiased, fair and sustainable AI solutions. The framework provided by ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is also discussed in terms of its benefits in critical areas such as data security, operational efficiency, regulatory compliance and competitive advantage. In this context, it is emphasized that companies can adopt AI applications not only as a technical innovation but also as a strategic management element. The integration processes between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management System and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System are presented, highlighting how these two standards complement each other. An analysis is provided on how principles of information security, risk management, and transparency can be effectively implemented within AI systems. In conclusion, the adoption of the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI management system enables companies to manage AI applications within a secure and ethical framework while achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in their digital transformation processes.

🔖

Cite This Article

Biroğul, S., Şahin, Ö., əsgərli, H. (2025). Exploring the Impact of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management Standard on Organizational Practices. Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.54569/aair.1709628

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.
  2. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399.
  3. Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector Applications and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615.
  4. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Standard, https://www.iso.org/standard/81230.html
  5. IEEE. (2023). Ethically Aligned Design: Prioritizing Human Well-being with AI, https://sagroups.ieee.org/global-initiative/wp-content/uploads/sites/542/2023/01/ead1e-overview.pdf
  6. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Standard, https://www.iso.org/standard/27001
  7. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The Business of Artificial Intelligence: What It Can and Cannot Do for Your Organization. Harvard Business Review.
  8. European Commission. (2024). Regulation on Artificial Intelligence (AI Act), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1689
  9. Topol, E. (2019). Deep Medicine: How AI Can Make Healthcare Human Again, Basic Books, Inc. HarperCollins.
  10. PwC. (2023). AI Governance and Corporate Strategy, https://www.pwc.com
  11. OECD (2024). Artificial Intelligence, https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/artificial-intelligence.html
  12. NIST. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework, https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework/ai-rmf-development
  13. McKinsey & Company (2022). The State of AI, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-in-2022-and-a-half-decade-in-review
  14. Deloitte (2023). AI Governance in practice: A Framework for Trustworthy AI, https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/technology/articles/trustworthy-ai-governance-in-practice.html
  15. Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change, Harvard Business Review Press.
  16. GDPR (2018). General Data Protection Regulation, https://gdpr-info.eu/
  17. UNESCO. (2023). AI in Education: Bridging the Skill Gap, https://www.unesco.org/en/digital-education/artificial-intelligence
  18. Biroğul, S. (2024). Iso/Iec 27001:2022 Bilgi Güvenliği Yönetim Sistemi Uygulayıcılarına/ Denetçilerine Yönelik El Rehberi ve Vaka Örnekleri, Nobel Yayın