Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

CEEMD-subset-OASVR-GRNN for ozone forecasting: Xiamen and Harbin as cases

Pages
744–754
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The prediction results show that the systematic clustering method is helpful for effectively improving the prediction accuracy of the combined model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tropospheric ozone is a standard air pollutant, and can adversely affect human respiratory system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Specifically, for the ozone time series, CEEMD is used to decompose the original data into three intrinsic mode functions (IMFS), PSO-SVR, PSOGSA-SVR, GWO-SVR and GRNN are employed to model and predict the IMFS, and the prediction results are randomly combined to establish 100 individual models (appendix Table A1).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The prediction results show that the systematic clustering method is helpful for effectively improving the prediction accuracy of the combined model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Tropospheric ozone is a standard air pollutant, and can adversely affect human respiratory system. Many metropolitan areas around the world struggle to meet ozone standards. Therefore, timely and effective ozone prediction can help regulatory agencies to prevent the harm to human body and environment induced by excessive ozone concentration in advance. For selecting the optimal individual model set in combined forecasting, this research proposes CEEMD-Subset-OASVR-GRNN model, based on complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition (CEEMD) method, support vector regression (SVR), generalized regression neural network (GRNN) and optimization algorithms (OA), to predict the daily average concentration of ozone. Specifically, for the ozone time series, CEEMD is used to decompose the original data into three intrinsic mode functions (IMFS), PSO-SVR, PSOGSA-SVR, GWO-SVR and GRNN are employed to model and predict the IMFS, and the prediction results are randomly combined to establish 100 individual models (appendix Table A1). The selection methods of the individual models include MSE ranking, factor score and unsupervised learning systematic clustering, and the influence of number of individual models on combined forecasting is studied. The ozone series of two very distinct Chinese metropolitan areas, Xiamen and Harbin, are selected as the experimental data. The prediction results show that the systematic clustering method is helpful for effectively improving the prediction accuracy of the combined model.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZHU, S., LING, W. X., SHI, N., LU, M. (2020). CEEMD-subset-OASVR-GRNN for ozone forecasting: Xiamen and Harbin as cases. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 744–754. https://ajindex.com/articles/143951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Al-Alawi, S.M., Abdul-Wahab, S.A., Bakheit, C.S., 2008. Combining principal component regression and artificial neural networks for more accurate predictions of groundlevel ozone. Environ. Model. Softw 23 (4), 396–403.
  2. Breiman, L., 1996. Stacked regressions. Mach. Learn. 24 (1), 49–64.
  3. Bunn, D.W., 1975. A Bayesian approach to the linear combination of forecasts. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 26 (2), 325–329.
  4. Brandt, J., Christensen, J.H., Frohn, L.M., Palmgren, F., Berkowicz, R., Zlatev, Z., 2001. Operational air pollution forecasts from European to local scale. Atmos. Environ. 35, S91–S98. Bates, J.M., Granger, C.W.J., 1969. The combination of forecasts. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 20 (4), 451–468.
  5. Celikoglu, H.B., Cigizoglu, H.K., 2007. Public transportation trip flow modeling with generalized regression neural networks. Adv. Eng. Software 38 (2), 71–79.
  6. Chen, G.J., Li, K.K., Chung, T.S., Sun, H.B., Tang, G.Q., 2001. Application of an innovative combined forecasting method in power system load forecasting. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 59 (2), 131–137.
  7. Chan, F., Pauwels, L.L., 2018. Some theoretical results on forecast combinations. Int. J. Forecast. 34 (1), 64–74.
  8. Cheng, G., Yang, Y., 2015. Forecast combination with outlier protection. Int. J. Forecast. 31 (2), 223–237.
  9. Durao, R.M., Mendes, M.T., Joao Pereira, M., 2016. Forecasting O-3 levels in industrial area surroundings up to 24 h in advance, combining classification trees and MLP models. Atmos. Poll. Res. 7 (6), 961–970.
  10. Fei, S.W., Liu, C.L., Miao, Y.B., 2009. Support vector machine with genetic algorithm for forecasting of key-gas ratios in oil-immersed transformer. Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (3), 6326–6331.
  11. Feng, Y., Zhang, W.F., Sun, D.Z., Zhang, L.Q., 2011. Ozone concentration forecast method based on genetic algorithm optimized back propagation neural networks and support vector machine data classification. Atmos. Environ. 45 (11), 1979–1985.
  12. Granger, C.W.J., 1989. Combining forecasts-twenty years later. J. Forecast. 8 (3), 167–173.
  13. Granger, C., Newbold, P., 1974. Spurious regressions in econometrics. J. Econom. 2 (2), 111–120.
  14. Haidar, A.M.A., Mustafa, M.W., Ibrahim, F.A.F., Ahmed, I.A., 2011. Transient stability evaluation of electrical power system using generalized regression neural networks. Appl. Soft Comput. 11 (4), 3558–3570.
  15. Hoeting, J.A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A.E., Volinsky, C.T., 1999. Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat. Sci. 14 (4), 382–401.
  16. He, Y.Y., Yan, Y.D., Xu, Q.F., 2019. Wind and solar power prob