Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 10

An inter-comparison of size segregated carbonaceous aerosol collected by low-volume impactor in the port-cities of Venice (Italy) and Rijeka (Croatia)

Pages
1705–1714
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The WSOC/OC analysis as function of particle size in Rijeka showed a total value of 0.51 ( ± 0.12) with an increase in the coarse fraction likely due to contributions of water soluble carbon from sea spray and biogenic emissions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Size-segregated analysis of organic and elemental carbon (EC, OC) in aerosol is essential in understanding sources and effects on the environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To partially fill this lack of information, aerosol size segregated samples were taken between August 2018 and May 2019, using a MOUDI impactor.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The WSOC/OC analysis as function of particle size in Rijeka showed a total value of 0.51 ( ± 0.12) with an increase in the coarse fraction likely due to contributions of water soluble carbon from sea spray and biogenic emissions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Size-segregated analysis of organic and elemental carbon (EC, OC) in aerosol is essential in understanding sources and effects on the environment. However, these studies are scarce, especially in coastal areas stressed by anthropogenic emissions and with interactions between anthropogenic and natural emissions. To partially fill this lack of information, aerosol size segregated samples were taken between August 2018 and May 2019, using a MOUDI impactor. Measurements were performed in two port-cities of Northern Adriatic Sea, Venice (Italy) and Rijeka (Croatia). A thermal-optical analysis (EUSAAR2) allowed EC and OC determination in different size ranges. For Rijeka site, the water soluble organic carbon content (WSOC) was analysed. OC and EC average concentrations in Venice were 3.16 ( ± 0.97) and 0.40 ( ± 0.13) μg/m3 ; in Rijeka: 2.48 ( ± 0.65) and 0.37 ( ± 0.08) μg/m3 . The OC size distributions were bimodal at both sites, with an accumulation mode in the size range 0.56–0.32 μm, a coarse mode in the range 5.6–3.2 μm. EC showed a bimodal distribution in Rijeka, a single fine mode in Venice. The EC/TC ratio was large in the fine mode at both sites, however, in Rijeka non-negligible values were found in the coarse fraction suggesting contributions from resuspension of carbon-loaded dust and mixing of anthropogenic particles with sea spray. The WSOC/OC analysis as function of particle size in Rijeka showed a total value of 0.51 ( ± 0.12) with an increase in the coarse fraction likely due to contributions of water soluble carbon from sea spray and biogenic emissions.

🔖

Cite This Article

CESARI, D., MERICO, E., DINOI, A., CONTINI, D. (2020). An inter-comparison of size segregated carbonaceous aerosol collected by low-volume impactor in the port-cities of Venice (Italy) and Rijeka (Croatia). Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 10, 1705–1714. https://ajindex.com/articles/143943

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Agarwal, S., Aggarwal, S.G., Okuzawa, K., Kawamura, K., 2010. Size distributions of dicarboxylic acids, ketoacids, α-dicarbonyls, sugars, WSOC, OC, EC and inorganic ions in atmospheric particles over Northern Japan: implication for long-range transport of Siberian biomass burning and East Asian polluted aerosols. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (13), 5839–5858.
  2. Almeida, S.M., Pio, C.A., Freitas, M.C., Reis, M.A., Trancoso, M.A., 2006. Approaching PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 source apportionment by mass balance analysis, principal analysis and particle size distribution. Sci. Total Environ. 368, 663–674.
  3. Aymoz, G., Jaffrezo, J., Jacob, V., Colomb, A., George, C., 2004. Evolution of organic and inorganic components of aerosol during a Saharan dust episode observed in the French Alps. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2499–2512.
  4. Barbaro, E., Feltracco, M., Cesari, D., Padoan, S., Zangrando, R., Contini, D., Barbante, C., Gambaro, A., 2019. Characterization of the water soluble fraction in ultrafine, fine, and coarse atmospheric aerosol. Sci. Total Environ. 658, 1423–1439.
  5. Berner, A., Lurzer, C., 1980. Mass size distributions of traffic aerosols at vienna. J. Phys. Chem. 84, 2079–2083.
  6. Berner, A., Sidla, S., Galambos, Z., Kruisz, C., Hitzenberger, R., Brink, tenH.M., Kos, G.P.A., 1996. Modal character of atmospheric black carbon size distributions. J. Geophysical Res. Atmos. 101, 19559–19565.
  7. Birch, M.E., Cary, R.A., 1996. Elemental carbon-based method for monitoring occupational exposures to particulate diesel exhaust. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 25 (3), 221–241.
  8. Blanco, A., De Tomasi, F., Filippo, E., Manno, D., Perrone, M.R., Serra, A., Tafuro, A.M., Tepore, A., 2003. Characterization of African dust over southern Italy. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3, 2147–2159.
  9. Bougiatioti, A., Zarmpas, P., Koulouri, E., Antoniou, M., Theodosi, C., Kouvarakis, G., Saarikoski, S., Mäkelä, T., Hillamo, R., Mihalopoulos, N., 2013. Organic, elemental and water-soluble organic carbon in size segregated aerosols, in the marine boundary layer of the eastern Mediterranean. Atmos. Environ. Times 64, 251–262.
  10. Cavalli, F., Viana, M., Yttri, K.E., Genberg, J., Putaud, J.P., 2010. Toward a standardised D. Cesari, et al. Atmospheric Pollution Research 11 (2020) 1705–1714 1712 thermal-optical protocol for measuring atmospheric organic and elemental carbon: the EUSAAR protocol. Atmos. Meas. Tech 3, 79–89.
  11. Cavalli, F., Alastuey, A., Areskoug, H., Ceburnis, D., Cech, J., Genberg, J., Harrison, R., Jaffrezo, J.L., Kiss, G., Laj, P., et al.