Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Ambient PM2.5, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and biomass burning tracer in Mae Sot District, western Thailand

Pages
27–39
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results suggest that this area was not only exposed to PAHs that originated from traffic combustion, but was also exposed from biomass burning emissions, particularly during biomass burning season when there is an increased risks of cancer and mutation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Levoglucosan, as a biomass tracer, and sixteen polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in PM2.5 ambient air samples collected from Tak Province during smoke and non-smoke episodes were analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The average PM2.5, levoglucosan and total PAHs concentrations in the smoke episode were 61.64 ± 22.85, 1.00 ± 0.41 μg/m3 and 6.32 ± 2.26 ng/m3, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results suggest that this area was not only exposed to PAHs that originated from traffic combustion, but was also exposed from biomass burning emissions, particularly during biomass burning season when there is an increased risks of cancer and mutation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Levoglucosan, as a biomass tracer, and sixteen polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in PM2.5 ambient air samples collected from Tak Province during smoke and non-smoke episodes were analyzed. The average PM2.5, levoglucosan and total PAHs concentrations in the smoke episode were 61.64 ± 22.85, 1.00 ± 0.41 μg/m3 and 6.32 ± 2.26 ng/m3, respectively. This figures were significantly higher than those recorded during the nonepisode (13.76 ± 5.58, 0.12 ± 0.03 μg/m3 and 2.59 ± 0.15 ng/m3, respectively). The predominant PAHs proportions were comprised of Phenanthrene and Benzo[ghi]perylene and levoglucosan concentrations revealed a strong correlation with PM2.5 concentrations, which indicated the source of PM2.5 from biomass burning. Toxicity equivalent (TEQBaP) and the mutagenic equivalent (MEQBaP) levels during the smoke episode were significantly higher than those in the non-smoke episode. Furthermore, lifetime lung cancer risk recorded during smoke episode exceeded the acceptable cancer risk that has been recommended by US-EPA. These results suggest that this area was not only exposed to PAHs that originated from traffic combustion, but was also exposed from biomass burning emissions, particularly during biomass burning season when there is an increased risks of cancer and mutation. Although the exposure time in this area is relatively short, the high dose period of exposure occurs repetitively every year. In addition, backward trajectories showed that most of the air mass was generated from western region of Thailand and they were throughout the burning region not only emitted from local areas, but also from outside the country during the smoke episode.

🔖

Cite This Article

JANTA, R., SEKİGUCHİ, K., YAMAGUCHİ, R., SOPAJAREE, K., Pongpiachan, S., CHETİYANUKORNKUL, T. (2020). Ambient PM2.5, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and biomass burning tracer in Mae Sot District, western Thailand. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 27–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/143942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Amnuaylojaroen, T., Kreasuwun, J., 2012. Investigation of fine and coarse particulate matter from burning areas in Chiang Mai, Thailand using the WRF/CALPUFF. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 39 (2), 311–326. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), 1995. Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). Balgobin, A., Ramroop Singh, N., 2019. Source apportionment and seasonal cancer risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of sediments in a multi-use coastal environment containing a Ramsar wetland, for a Caribbean island. Sci. Total Environ. 664, 474–486.
  2. Bari, M.A., Baumbach, G., Kuch, B., Scheffknecht, G., 2011. Air pollution in residential areas from wood-fired heating. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 11, 749–757.
  3. Bari, MdA., Baumbach, G., Kuch, B., Scheffknecht, G., 2010. Particle-phase concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air of rural residential areas in southern German. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 3, 103–116.
  4. Benson, N.U., Essien, J.P., Asuquo, F.E., Eritobor, A.L., 2014. Occurrence and distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface microlayer and subsurface seawater of Lagos Lagoon, Nigeria. Environ. Monit. Assess. 186, 5519–5529.
  5. Boström, C.-E., Gerde, P., Hanberg, A., Jernström, B., Johansson, C., Kyrklund, T., Rannug, A., Törnqvist, M., Victorin, K., Westerholm, R., 2002. Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air. Environ. Health Perspect. 110 (3), 451–488.
  6. Brown, J.S., Gordon, T., Price, O., Asgharian, B., 2013. Thoracic and respirable particle definitions for human health risk assessment. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 10, 12. Cal-EPA, 2005. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Section, Oakland, CA. Callén, M.S., Iturmendi, A., López, J.M., 2014. Source apportionment of atmospheric PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by a PMF receptor model. Assessment of potential risk for human health. Environ. Pollut. 195, 167–177.
  7. Casati, R., Scheer, V., Vogt, R., Benter, T., 2007. Measurement of nucleation and soot mode particle emission from a diesel passenger car in real world and laboratory in situ dilution. Atmos. Environ. 41, 2125–2135.
  8. Chantara, S., Sillapapiromsuk, S., Wiriya, W., 2012. Atmospheric pollut