Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

Biomechanical comparison of Bunnell, modified Kessler, and Tsuge tendon repair techniques using two suture types

Pages
104–113
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For Tsuge and modified Kessler repairs, braided polyester suture use appears more advantageous compared to monofilament polydioxanone suture use in biomechanical terms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of modified Kessler, Bunnell and Tsuge techniques in sheep Achilles tendon tear repaired using polyester and polydioxanone sutures which are also compared.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Sixty sheep Achilles tendons were cut transversely as a substitute for rupture and repaired using modified Kessler, Bunnell and Tsuge techniques with No. 2 braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For Tsuge and modified Kessler repairs, braided polyester suture use appears more advantageous compared to monofilament polydioxanone suture use in biomechanical terms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of modified Kessler, Bunnell and Tsuge techniques in sheep Achilles tendon tear repaired using polyester and polydioxanone sutures which are also compared. Methods: Sixty sheep Achilles tendons were cut transversely as a substitute for rupture and repaired using modified Kessler, Bunnell and Tsuge techniques with No. 2 braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures. Specimens were loaded to failure. Four biomechanical parameters – ultimate strength (US), strength to 2 mm gap (S2G), strength to 5 mm gap (S5G) and Young’s modulus (YM) – were recorded for statistical analysis. Results: The Tsuge-Polyester group demonstrated the highest results regarding S2G (21.24±4.75 N) (p=.002) and S5G (38.91±7.45 N) (p=.002). According to YM, the Bunnell-Polyester group was the most superior (1929.9±512.28 kilopascal) (p=.009). In the repairs with the polydioxanone suture, Bunnell technique achieved the best purchase with regard to S2G (18.14±6.86 N) (p=.006) and S5G (35.69±13.49 N) (p=.015). The difference between the three repair techniques with the polydioxanone suture was statistically insignificant regarding US (p=.252) and YM (p=.338). Concerning the repairs with the polyester suture, the repair techniques demonstrated no statistically significant difference in terms of US (p=.195), S2G (p=.667), S5G (p=.689) and YM (p=.195). Regarding the mean S2G and S5G values, the polyester suture was significantly superior to the polydioxanone suture in modified Kessler repairs (S2G: p<.001, S5G: p=.001) and Tsuge repairs (S2G: p<.001, S5G: p=.009). The polyester suture was also significantly superior to the polydioxanone suture in the modified Kessler repairs with respect to YM (p=.003). Conclusion: This study supports the opinion that Tsuge technique is a promising procedure in Achilles tendon repair (ATR). For Tsuge and modified Kessler repairs, braided polyester suture use appears more advantageous compared to monofilament polydioxanone suture use in biomechanical terms.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜNDAR, N., GÜNERİ, B., ÜZEL, M., DOĞANER, A. (2020). Biomechanical comparison of Bunnell, modified Kessler, and Tsuge tendon repair techniques using two suture types. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 104–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/143920

References (14)

  1. Doral MN, Alam M, Bozkurt M, et al. Functional anatomy of the Achilles tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010
  2. 63843. [CrossRef] Wang D, Sandlin MI, Cohen JR, Lord EL, Petrigliano FA, SooHoo NF. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: An analysis of 12,570 patients in a large healthcare database. Foot Ankle Surg 2015
  3. [CrossRef] Ding WG, Li H, Zhu YP, Liu ZW. Comparison between tenocutaneous suture and Kessler suture techniques in treating acute closed Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Surg 2014
  4. [CrossRef] Gorschewsky O, Vogel U, Schweizer A, van Laar B. Percutaneous tenodesis of the Achilles tendon. A new surgical method for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture through percutaneous tenodesis. Injury 1999
  5. [CrossRef] Kadakia AR, Dekker RG, Ho BS. Acute achilles tendon ruptures: An update on treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017
  6. [CrossRef] Khan RJ, Fick D, Keogh A, Crawford J, Brammar T, Parker M. Treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005
  7. [CrossRef] Santrock RD, Friedmann AJ, Hanselman AE. Acute rupture open repair techniques. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2017
  8. [CrossRef] Stavrou M, Seraphim A, Al-Hadithy N, Mordecai SC. Review article: Treatment for Achilles tendon ruptures in athletes. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2013
  9. [CrossRef] Herbort M, Haber A, Zantop T, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the primary stability of suturing Achilles tendon rupture: A cadaver study of Bunnell and Kessler techniques under cyclic loading conditions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Watson TW, Jurist KA, Yang KH, Shen KL. The strength of Achilles tendon repair: An in vitro study of the biomechanical behavior in human cadaver tendons. Foot Ankle Int 1995
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Yammine K, Assi C. Efficacy of repair techniques of the Achilles tendon: A meta-analysis of human cadaveric biomechanical studies. Foot (Edinb) 2017
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Yildirim Y, Esemenli T. Initial pull-out strength of tendon sutures: An in vitro study in sheep Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Int 2002
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Yildirim Y, Saygi B, Kara H, Cabukoğlu C, Esemenli T. Tendon holding capacities of the suture materials used in repairing Achilles tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2006
  14. Zandbergen RA, de Boer SF, Swierstra