Journals / Central Bank Review / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Career choice and the strength of weak ties

Pages
91–97
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thisis an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper argues that the structure (i.e., size and composition) of the informal search network is acrucial determinant of the career decisions of young workers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Building on the search-theoretic careerchoice and job mobility model proposed by Neal (1999), I compare the consequences of career advice byone's weak ties versus that by strong ties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thisis an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper argues that the structure (i.e., size and composition) of the informal search network is acrucial determinant of the career decisions of young workers. Building on the search-theoretic careerchoice and job mobility model proposed by Neal (1999), I compare the consequences of career advice byone's weak ties versus that by strong ties. The main result is that receiving help from weak ties isassociated with early career and job settlements, while the strong ties are more likely to lead to ampliŞedmobility and generate mismatch. Given a network size, IŞnd a strongly positive correlation between thefraction of weak ties among one's informal connections and the likelihood of settling on a stable careerpath early in the life course. I alsoŞnd that the sign of this correlation persists, while the magnitude getssmaller as the network size increases. I conclude that the strength-of-weak-ties hypothesis can shed lighton the complexity of job mobility patterns among young workers. The model can explain why it takesmuch longer for blacksdwhose informal networks are documented to consist of strong tiesdto locate astable career path than their white counterparts. It also predicts that young workers from closed andsegregated neighborhoods tend to spend more time before theyŞnd suitable careers.© 2017 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Central Bank of The Republic of Turkey. Thisis an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜMEN, S. (2017). Career choice and the strength of weak ties. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 91–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/143842

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Allen, W.R., 1995. African American family life in social context: crisis and hope. Sociol. Forum 10, 569e592. Altonji, J.G., Shakotko, R.A., 1987. Do wages rise with job seniority? Rev. Econ. Stud. 54, 437e459. Becker, G.S., 1962. Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. J. Political Econ. 70, 1e13. Bentolila, S., Michelacci, C., Suarez, J., 2010. Social contacts and occupational choice. Economica 77, 20e45. Boorman, S.A., 1975. A combinatorial optimization model for transmission of job information through contact networks. Bell J. Econ. 6, 216e249. Bridges, W., Villemez, W., 1986. Informal hiring and income in the labor market. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51, 574e582. Goel, D., Lang, K., 2009. Social ties and the job search of recent immigrants. NBER Working Paper Series, #15186. Granovetter, M.S., 1973. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78, 1360e1380. Granovetter, M.S., 1983. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory 1, 201e233. Granovetter, M.S., 1995. Getting a Job: a Study of Contacts and Careers. University of Chicago Press,
  2. Chicago, IL. Halaby, C.N., 1988. Action and information in the job mobility process: the search decision. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53, 9e25. Higgins, M.C., 2001. Changing careers: the effects of social context. J. Organ. Behav. 22, 595e618. Johnson, W.R., 1978. A theory of job shopping. Q. J. Econ. 92, 261e278. Jovanovic, B., 1979. Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econ. 87, 972e990. Kambourov, G., Manovskii, I., 2009. Occupational specificity of human capital. Int. Econ. Rev. 50, 63e115. Lai, G., Lin, N., Leung, S.-Y., 1998. Network resources, contact resources, and status attainment. Soc. Netw. 20, 159e178. Lin, N., 1982. Social resources and instrumental action. In: Lin, N., Marsden, P.V. (Eds.), Social Structure and Network Analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 131e145. Ljungqvist, L., Sargent, T.J., 2004. Recursive Macroeconomic Theory. MIT Press,
  3. Cambridge. Marsden, P.V., Hurlbert, J., 1988. Social resources and mobility outcomes: a replication and extension. Soc. Forces 66, 1038e1059. McCall, B.P., 1990. Occupational matching: a test of sorts. J. Political Econ. 98, 45e69. McCall, B.P., 1991. A dynamic model of occupational choice. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 15, 387e408. McCall, J.J., 1970. Economics of information and job search. Q. J. Econ. 84, 113e126. Miller, R.A., 1984. Job matching and occupational choice. J. Political Econ. 92, 1086e1120. Montgomery, J.D., 1