Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Knowledge And Attitudes Towards Genetic Testing In Those Affected With Chronic Diseases

Pages
212–218
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it was found that they had more positive attitudes towards genetics tests and genetics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Backround Genetics is increasingly penetrating modern medicine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results 346 people participated in the study, and their mean age was 55.99 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it was found that they had more positive attitudes towards genetics tests and genetics.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Genetic tests · Chronic diseases · Attitude

Özet

Backround Genetics is increasingly penetrating modern medicine. It should be investigated whether there is a relationship between knowledge and attitude in developing Muslim countries. Objectives This study aims to investigate the relationship between the genetic information levels of individuals with a chronic disease and their attitudes towards genetic testing. Method This cross - sectional study was carried out between individuals with one and / or more chronic diseases living in rural and urban areas were included in the study. Participants were asked to complete the questionnaire forms. Results 346 people participated in the study, and their mean age was 55.99 years. The level of Genetic Knowledge of the participants was very low, and the majority (about 80%) gave the wrong answers to almost all of the related questions. The mean scores of attitudes and genetic information of the participants in urban areas compared to those living in rural areas were found to be higher. In addition, it was found that they had more positive attitudes towards genetics tests and genetics. Conclusions Although it is thought that individuals with chronic diseases are experts in their diseases, it is understood that this is not the case in genetics. This result seems to be due to lack of knowledge rather than being closed to genetic developments. In addition, the study revealed that the fatalistic approach in a Muslim society was not decisive in the approach to genetic testing; therefore, it is important to pay attention to these issues when planning genetic health services.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTAN, S., ÇAM, F. S. (2020). Knowledge And Attitudes Towards Genetic Testing In Those Affected With Chronic Diseases. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 212–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/143832

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Referans 1 WHO. Preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment. [Internet]. Vita-Finzi L, editor. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. 182 p. [cited 2019 Feb 4]. Available from: https://app.luminpdf.com/viewer/9hMT7hpbL47HWFMDj Referans 2 WHO. GLOBAL STATUS REPORT on noncommunicable diseases 201 4 "Attaining the nine global noncommunicable diseases targets; a shared responsibility"Geneva; 2014. [cited 2019 Feb 4]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/148114/9789241564854_eng.pdf;jsessionid=2700014C4A829DFCC74F432DAF43F7F0?sequence=1 Referans 3 Chokoshvili D, Belmans C, Poncelet R, Sanders S, Vaes D, Vears D, et al. Public Views on Genetics and Genetic Testing: A Survey of the General Public in Belgium. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers. 2017;21(3):195–201. Referans 4 U.S. National Library of Medicine. What is genetic testing? [cited 2019 Feb 4]. Available from: https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/testing/genetictesting Referans 5 WHO. Medical genetic services in developing countries The Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of genetic testing and screening Human Genetics Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion World Health Organization. Geneva; 2006. [cited 2019 Feb 4]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43288/924159344X_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Referans 6 Fagbemiro L, Adebamowo C. Knowledge and attitudes to personal genomics testing for complex diseases among Nigerians. BMC medical ethics. 2014;15(1):34. Referans 7 Evans JP, Skrzynia C, Burke W. The complexities of predictive genetic testing. BMJ (Clinical research ed). British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2001 Apr 28;322(7293):1052–6. Referans 8 Zimmern RL. Issues concerning the evaluation and regulation of predictive genetic testing. Journal of community genetics. 2014;5(1):49–57. Referans 9 Wauters A, Van Hoyweghen I. Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review. Journal of Human Genetics. 2016;61(4):275–82. Referans 10 Scuffham TM, McInerny-Leo A, Ng S-K, Mellick G. Knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing in those affected with Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Community Genetics. 2014;5(2):167–77. Referans 11 Shen J. Precision assessment of public attitudes toward genetic testing. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 2016;170(12):3185–8. Referans 12 Akdağ R. Türkiye Sağlıkta Dönüşüm Programı Değerlendirme Raporu (2003-2011) T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı - E-Kütüphane Sistem