SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Sayı: 20

NEW PARADIGM IN SUPPLY CHAIN TRACEABILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY: BLOCKCHAIN

TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ İZLENEBİLİRLİĞİ VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNDE YENİ PARADİGMA: BLOKZİNCİR

Erdinc Koc(Bingöl Üniversitesi, Bingöl, Türkiye)0000-0002-8209-5714
Pages
417–438
Publication Date
2020-10-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is considered that the use of blockchain technological infrastructure will positively affect supply chain transparency in terms of traceability and sustainability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite the increasing awareness level of the block chain and its use in different fields, there are only a few studies on the use of blockchain technology in the field of supply chain management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Supply chain traceability and supply chain sustainability, which are dealt with separately in different studies, are evaluated in this study with the blockchain technological infrastructure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is considered that the use of blockchain technological infrastructure will positively affect supply chain transparency in terms of traceability and sustainability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Blokzincir · Tedarik Zinciri · İzlenebilirlik

Abstract

Despite the increasing awareness level of the block chain and its use in different fields, there are only a few studies on the use of blockchain technology in the field of supply chain management. Supply chain traceability and supply chain sustainability, which are dealt with separately in different studies, are evaluated in this study with the blockchain technological infrastructure. In the study, the case study method was adopted, and the case studies of blockchain projects were shared. It is considered that the use of blockchain technological infrastructure will positively affect supply chain transparency in terms of traceability and sustainability.

Özet

Blokzincirin günden güne artan farkındalık düzeyiyle birlikte farklı alanlarda kullanılabilirliği hem akademisyenler hem de uygulayıcılar tarafından çalışılmaktadır. Ancak blokzincir teknolojisinin tedarik zinciri yönetimi alanında kullanımı ile ilgili henüz az sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır. Farklı çalışmalarda ayrı ayrı ele alınan tedarik zinciri izlenebilirliği ve tedarik zinciri sürdürülebilirliği bu çalışmada blokzincir teknolojik altyapısıyla değerlendirilmektedir. Çalışmada yöntem olarak örnek olay yöntemi benimsenerek blokzincir projelerinin örnek olayları paylaşılmıştır. Blokzincir teknolojik altyapısının kullanımının tedarik zinciri şeffaflığını; izlenebilirlik ve sürdürülebilirlik açısından olumlu yönde etkileyeceği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koc, E. (2020). NEW PARADIGM IN SUPPLY CHAIN TRACEABILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY: BLOCKCHAIN. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 20, 417–438. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.731939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (67)

  1. Akkermans, H., Bogerd, P., ve Doremalen, J. Van. (2004). Travail, transparency and trust: A case study of computer-supported collaborative supply chain planning in high-tech electronics. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 445–456.
  2. Ariyawardana, A., Ganegodage, K., ve Mortlock, M. Y. (2017). Consumers' trust in vegetable supply chain members and their behavioural responses: A study based in Queensland, Australia. Food Control, 73, 193–201.
  3. Banerjee, R., ve Menon, H. (2015). Traceability in Food and Agricultural Products. International Trade Center Report.
  4. Bano, S., Sonnino, A., Al-Bassam, M., Azouvi, S., McCorry, P., Meiklejohn, S., ve Danezis, G. (2017). Consensus in the Age of Blockchains.
  5. Bastian, J., ve Zentes, J. (2013). Supply chain transparency as a key prerequisite for sustainable agri-food supply chain management. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research. Taylor ve Francis.
  6. Bechini, A., Cimino, M. G. C. A., Marcelloni, F., ve Tomasi, A. (2008). Patterns and technologies for enabling supply chain traceability through collaborative e-business, 50, 342–359.
  7. Beulens, A. J. M., Folstar, P., ve Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Food safety and transparency in food chains and networks Relationships and challenges, 16, 481–486.
  8. Bhaduri, G., ve Ha-Brookshire, J. E. (2011). Do Transparent Business Practices Pay? Exploration of Transparency and Consumer Purchase Intention. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 29(2), 135–149.
  9. Bogart, S., ve Rice, K. (2015). The Blockchain Report: Welcome to the Internet of Value. Needham ve Company, October, 1–57.
  10. Bradu, C., ve Orquin, J. L. (2014). The Mediated Influence of a Traceability Label on Consumer ’ s Willingness to Buy the Labelled Product, 283–295.
  11. Chapman, J. (1995). Transparency? What transparency? Business Ethics: A European Review, 4(3), 139–142.
  12. Charlebois, S., Sterling, B., Haratifar, S. and Naing, S. K. (2014), Comparison of Global Food Traceability Regulations and Requirements. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 13: 1104-1123.
  13. Chen, L., Yue, T., ve Zhao, X. (2018). 8 Ways brands can fight counterfaits in China. Harvard Business Review https://hbr.org/2018/05/8-ways-brands-can-fight-counterfeits-in-china
  14. Chen, J. V, Yen, D. C., Rajkumar, T. M., ve Tomochko, N. A. (2011). Computer Standards ve Interfaces The antecedent factors on trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. Computer Standards ve Interfaces, 33(3), 262–270.
  15. Egels-zandén, N., ve Hansson, N. (2016). Supply Chain Transparency as a Consumer or Corporate Tool: The Case of Nudie Jeans Co. Journal of Consumer Policy, 377–395.
  16. Egels-zandén, N., Hulthén, K., ve Wulff, G. (2015). Trade-offs in supply chain transparency: the case of Nudie Jeans Co. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 95–104.
  17. Eisenhardt, K. M., ve Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
  18. Eppler, M. J. (2006). Managing information quality: Increasing the value of information in knowledge-intensive products and processes. Berlin: Springer.
  19. Fawcett, S. E., Jones, S. L., ve Fawcett, A. M. (2012). Supply chain trust: The catalyst for collaborative innovation. Business Horizons, 55(2), 163–178.
  20. Galvez, J. F., Mejuto, J. C., ve Simal-Gandara, J. (2018). Future challenges on the use of blockchain for food traceability analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 107, 222–232.
  21. Gürbüz, S., ve Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  22. Halil, F. M., Mohammed, M. F., Mahbub, R., ve Saifuza, A. (2016). Trust Attributes to Supply Chain Partnering in Industrialised Building System. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 46–55.
  23. Hofstede, G. J. (2004). Terminology. In G. J. Hofstede, H. Schepers, L. Spaans-Dijkstra, J. Trienekens ve A. Beulens (Eds.), Hide or Confide? The Dilemma of Transparency (pp. 19-25). 's Gravenhage: Reed Business Information.
  24. Hyperledger. (2018). About Hyperledger. https://www.hyperledger.org/about
  25. IBM News Room. (2018). Maersk and IBM Introduce Tradelens Blockchain Shipping Solution. https://newsroom.ibm.com/2018-08-09-Maersk-and-IBM-Introduce-TradeLens-Blockchain-Shipping-Solution
  26. ICCO. (2007). Sustainable Cocoa Economy: A Comprehensive and Participatory Approach. International Cocoa Organization Report.
  27. Kshetri, N. (2016)a. Creation, deployment, diffusion and export of Sub-Saharan Africa-originated information technology-related innovations. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 2174-1287.
  28. Kshetri, N. (2016)b. Big data's role in expanding access to financial services in China. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 297-308.
  29. Kshetri, N. (2018). Blockchain ’ s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 80–89.
  30. Kwon, I. G., ve Suh, T. (2004). Factors Affecting the Level of Trust and Commitment in Supply Chain Relationships. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(2), 4–14.
  31. Lamming, R., Caldwell, N., ve Harrison, D. (2004). Developing the Concept of Transparency for Use in Supply Relationships. British Journal of Management, 15, 291–302.
  32. Madhwal, Y., ve Panfilov, P. (2017). Blockchain And Supply Chain Management: Aircrafts’ Parts’ Business Case, Proceedings of the 28th International DAAAM Symposium Book. 1051–1056.
  33. Mol, A. P. J. (2015). Transparency and value chain sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 154–161.
  34. New, S. (2010). Operations: The Transparent Supply Chain. Harvard Business Review, 88(10), 76–82.
  35. Newfoodmagazine. (2018). 8 in 10 consumers check the origin of their food when purchasing products. https://www.newfoodmagazine.com/news/42541/8-10-consumers-labelling/
  36. Noor, S., Yang, W., Guo, M., van Dam, K. H., ve Wang, X. (2018). Energy Demand Side Management within micro-grid networks enhanced by blockchain. Applied Energy, 228(April), 1385–1398.
  37. Norton, T., Beier, J., ve Shields, L. (2014). A guide to traceability. New York.
  38. Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., ve Janssen, M. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 355–364.
  39. Önder, I., ve Treiblmaier, H. (2018). Blockchain and tourism: Three research propositions. Annals of Tourism Research, 72(March), 180–182.
  40. Pazaitis, A., De Filippi, P., ve Kostakis, V. (2017). Blockchain and value systems in the sharing economy: The illustrative case of Backfeed. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125(May), 105–115.
  41. Pimentel, D. (2017). Walimai using Blockchain to combat product counterfaiting. https://blocktribune.com/walimai-using-blockchain-combat-product-counterfeiting/
  42. Provenance white paper. (2018). https://www.provenance.org/
  43. Rahimi, F., Møller, C., ve Hvam, L. (2016). Business process management and IT management: The missing integration. International Journal of Information Management, 36(1), 142–154.
  44. Ries, S., Ingemann, D., Berggreen, L., Petersen, L., Dieckmann, S., Rehder, S., ve Bengtsen, P. (2013). Behind the rubber level. DanWatch Report, Denmark. Ripe. (2018). http://www.ripe.io/
  45. Robomed Network Whitepaper. (2018). Robomed Network Whitepaper Initial Coin Offering. https://robomed.io/tokens/download/Robomed_whitepaper_eng_final.pdf
  46. Rowley, J. (2002). Using case studies in research. Management Research News, 25(1), 16–27.
  47. Seawright, J., ve Gerring, J. (2008). Case-selection techniques in case study research a menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.
  48. Singhal, B., Dhameja, G., ve Panda, P. S. (2018). Beginning Blockchain A Beginner’s Guide to Building Blockchain Solutions. Bangalore: Apress.
  49. Splitter, J. (2018). Ripe.io and Its 'Blockchain of Food' secures $2.4 Million in Funding. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jennysplitter/2018/09/11/ripe-io-and-its-blockchain-of-food-secures-2-4-million-in-funding/#7f6b1f494435
  50. Supoto, Y., O. (2018). Waltonchain (WTC) Unveils World's First Blockchain Based Clothing Authenticity Traceability Systems. https://ethereumworldnews.com/waltonchain-wtc-unveils-worlds-first-blockchain-based-clothing-authenticity-traceability-system/
  51. Tysiachniouk, M. (2013). Forest Policy and Economics Fostering transparency in the transnational supply chain: From Russian forest producers to consumers in Europe and the USA ☆. Forest Policy and Economics, 31, 3–11.
  52. Viriyasitavat, W., ve Hoonsopon, D. (2018). Blockchain characteristics and consensus in modern business processes. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, (July), 0–1.
  53. Vranken, H. (2017). Sustainability of bitcoin and blockchains. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 1–9.
  54. Wacoin Whitepaper. (2018). Wabi crypto token for safe consumer products. https://resources.wacoin.io/WaBI_Whitepaper_ENG.pdf
  55. Wang, R. Y., ve Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12,5–33.
  56. Waltonchain Whitepaper. (2018). Waltonchain Whitepaper V2.0. https://waltonchain.org/templets/default/doc/Waltonchain%20White%20Paper%202.0_EN.pdf
  57. Wognum, P. M. N., Bremmers, H., Trienekens, J. H., Vorst, J. G. A. J. Van Der, ve Bloemhof, J. M. (2011). Advanced Engineering Informatics Systems for sustainability and transparency of food supply chains – Current status and challenges. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(1), 65–76.
  58. Xu, L. Da, Xu, E. L., ve Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 7543, 1–22.
  59. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: CA: Sage.
  60. Yue, X., Wang, H., Jin, D., Li, M., ve Jiang, W. (2016). Healthcare Data Gateways: Found Healthcare Intelligence on Blockchain with Novel Privacy Risk Control. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(10).
  61. Akkermans, H., Bogerd, P., ve Doremalen, J. Van. (2004). Travail, transparency and trust: A case study of computer-supported collaborative supply chain planning in high-tech electronics. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 445–456.
  62. Ariyawardana, A., Ganegodage, K., ve Mortlock, M. Y. (2017). Consumers' trust in vegetable supply chain members and their behavioural responses: A study based in Queensland, Australia. Food Control, 73, 193–201.
  63. Charlebois, S., Sterling, B., Haratifar, S. and Naing, S. K. (2014), Comparison of Global Food Traceability Regulations and Requirements. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 13: 1104-1123.
  64. Egels-zandén, N., ve Hansson, N. (2016). Supply Chain Transparency as a Consumer or Corporate Tool: The Case of Nudie Jeans Co. Journal of Consumer Policy, 377–395.
  65. Egels-zandén, N., Hulthén, K., ve Wulff, G. (2015). Trade-offs in supply chain transparency: the case of Nudie Jeans Co. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 95–104.
  66. Fawcett, S. E., Jones, S. L., ve Fawcett, A. M. (2012). Supply chain trust: The catalyst for collaborative innovation. Business Horizons, 55(2), 163–178.
  67. Tysiachniouk, M. (2013). Forest Policy and Economics Fostering transparency in the transnational supply chain: From Russian forest producers to consumers in Europe and the USA ☆. Forest Policy and Economics, 31, 3–11.