Journals / Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

A Phenomenological Interpretation of Tanpınar’s No-tion of Temporality in 'Neither am I Inside Time' and Gerontranscendence

Pages
729–743
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This pa-per will illustrate its argument with an example of Tanpınar’s character Hayri, who is an elderly wanderer living through the gerotranscendence as a state of spectating existence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, we will interpret Tanpınar’s poem, “Neither am I in-side Time”, from an existential-phenomenological perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We will discuss Ali Akay’s reading of the importance of virtual time in Tanpınar’s works, and contest his claim that Tanpınar’s notion of temporality is non-phenomenological.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This pa-per will illustrate its argument with an example of Tanpınar’s character Hayri, who is an elderly wanderer living through the gerotranscendence as a state of spectating existence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this article, we will interpret Tanpınar’s poem, “Neither am I in-side Time”, from an existential-phenomenological perspective. We will discuss Ali Akay’s reading of the importance of virtual time in Tanpınar’s works, and contest his claim that Tanpınar’s notion of temporality is non-phenomenological. A phenomenological approach in interpreting the poem provides us with a rich and inspiring reading of the core role of temporality in Tanpınar’s art. We maintain the argument that Tanpınar’s fascination with temporality can be read with a view to Heideggerian attitude of temporality which is a possibility of transcending-as-such. In Tanpınar, temporality is de-picted as a threshold experience promising a possibility to transcend the unity of being and understanding that is an example of gerotranscendence. This pa-per will illustrate its argument with an example of Tanpınar’s character Hayri, who is an elderly wanderer living through the gerotranscendence as a state of spectating existence.

🔖

Cite This Article

CAMCI, M. C., ÇOBAN, M. (2019). A Phenomenological Interpretation of Tanpınar’s No-tion of Temporality in 'Neither am I Inside Time' and Gerontranscendence. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 729–743. https://ajindex.com/articles/143748

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Agamben, G. (2007). The Work of Man. Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignty and Life. (Eds. M. Calarco and S. DeCaroli). New York: Stanford University Press.
  2. Akay, A. (2006). Tanpınar’da İçerisi ve Dışarısı. Toplumbilim, Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar Özel Sayısı, 20, 5-8.
  3. Aristotle (1991). The Complete Works of Aristotle. (Ed. J. Barnes). Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
  4. Asiltürk, B. (2014). Tanpınar’ın Mektup ve Düşüncelerinde Şiirle İlgili Düşünceleri. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  5. Aydın, M. (2013). Kayıp Zamanın İzinde: Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar. Ankara:
  6. Baars, J. (2012). Aging and the Art of Living. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Univer-sity Press.
  7. Bowie, A. (2003). Aesthetics and Subjectivity From Kant to Nietzsche. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  8. Ciftci, E. (2018). Augustinus’un Zaman Anlayışı. Mediterranean Journal of Humani-ties, 8 (2), 313-320.
  9. Doğan, H. M. (2000). Yüzyılın Türk Şiiri. Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  10. Doğu Batı Yayınları.
  11. Enginün, İ. (2014). Son Durak: Zaman Kırıntıları. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  12. Engünin, İ. & Kerman, Z. (2007). Günlüklerin Işığında Tanpınar’la Başbaşa. İstan-bul: Dergâh Yayınları.
  13. Heidegger, M. (1975). Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Klostermann Seminar. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann. Heidegger, M. (1982). Basic Problems of Phenomenology. (Trans. A. Hofstadter). Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  14. Heidegger, M. (1995). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World-Finitude-Solitude. (Trans. W. McNeill and N. Walker). Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  15. Heidegger, M. (2000). Introduction to Metaphysics. (Trans. G. Fried and R. Polt). London: Yale University Press.
  16. Heidegger, M. (2006). Sein und Zeit. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Hızlan, D. (2006).
  17. Sönmüş Kibritin İzinde. Toplumbilim, Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar Özel Sayısı, 20, 21-51.
  18. Kant, I. (1929). Critique of Pure Reason. (Trans. N. K. Smith). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Kerman, Z. (1992). Tanpınar’ın Mektupları. İstanbul: Dergâh. Özkan, S. Ç. (2017). Richard Rorty'de Kamusal Alan-Özel Alan Ayrımı ve Eleştirisi. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23, 57-84.
  19. Rentzsch, J. & Şahin, İ. (2018). Tanpınar’ın Saklı Dünyası: Arayışlar, Keşifler, Yorumlar. Ankara:
  20. Doğu Batı Yayınları.
  21. Tanpınar, A. H. (1994). Bütün Şiirleri. Istanbul: Dergâh Yayınları.
  22. Tanpınar, A. H. (1998). Edebiyat Üzerine Makaleler. İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları.
  23. Tanpınar, A. H. (2008). A Mind at Peace. (Trans. E. Göknar). Brooklyn, NY