Journals / Alatarım / 2017 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Effects of Different Fertigation Levels on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Melon (Cucumis melo L.) Grown in the Central Anatolia Region

Farklı Fertigasyon Dozlarının İç Anadolu Bölgesinde Yetiştirilen Kavun (Cucumis melo L.) Bitkisinin Verimine ve Besin Elementleri Alımına Etkileri

Journal
Alatarım
Pages
10–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Current findings revealed that 100% fertigation treatment (16 kg damelon in the 1st and 2nd years as 3386 and 2927 kg da-1 respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study it was aimed to evaluate the effect of different fertigation levels (25, 50, 75 and 100%) on yield and nutrient uptake of melon that grown in the central Anatolia region, comparing with conventional fertilization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experiment was carried out at two consecutive years (2015 and 2016 growing seasons) under the field conditions at the research area of Cumhuriyet University Vocational School of Sivas Department of Crop and Animal Production.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Current findings revealed that 100% fertigation treatment (16 kg damelon in the 1st and 2nd years as 3386 and 2927 kg da-1 respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study it was aimed to evaluate the effect of different fertigation levels (25, 50, 75 and 100%) on yield and nutrient uptake of melon that grown in the central Anatolia region, comparing with conventional fertilization. The experiment was carried out at two consecutive years (2015 and 2016 growing seasons) under the field conditions at the research area of Cumhuriyet University Vocational School of Sivas Department of Crop and Animal Production. The experiment was designed according to completely randomized design with 3 replications and doses of 16 kg da-1 nitrogen (N) (Ammonium sulphate, (NH4)2SO4), 8 kg da-1 phosphorus (P) (Monopotassium phosphate, KH2PO4) and 20 kg da-1 potassium (K) (Potassium nitrate, KNO3) was applied to 100% fertigation treatment. The Yuva melon varietywas used as a test plant whereas experiment was irrigated 16 times throughout the growing period. Current findings revealed that 100% fertigation treatment (16 kg damelon in the 1st and 2nd years as 3386 and 2927 kg da-1 respectively. Moreover this treatment increased N (5.50%), Zn (39.6 mg kg-1) and Mn (40.0 mg kg-1) concentrations in the 1st year of the experiment. N, 8 kg da P, 20 kg da K) had the greatest yield of

Özet

Araştırmada farklı dozlarda fertigasyon uygulamalarının (%25, %50, %75 ve %100) geleneksel gübreleme (%0 fertigasyon) karşılaştırmalı olarak İç Anadolu bölgesinde yetiştirilen kavun bitkisinin verimine ve besin elementleri alımına etkilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sivas Meslek Yüksekokulu Bitkisel ve Hayvansal Üretim Bölümü araştırma deneme alanında tarla koşullarında 2 yıl süreyle (2015 ve 2016 yılı yetiştirme sezonunda) yürütülmüştür. Araştırma tesadüf parselleri deneme desenine göre 3 yinelemeli olarak yürütülmüş ve %100 fertigasyon dozuna saf olarak 16 kg/da azot (N) (Amonyum sülfat, (NH4)2SO4), 8 kg/da fosfor (P) (Monopotasyum fosfat, KH2PO4) ve 20 kg/da potasyum (K) (Potasyum nitrat, KNO3) uygulanmıştır. Kavun çeşidi olarak Yuva kullanılmış ve kavun bitkisine yetiştirme periyodu boyunca toplam 16 kez sulama yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, I. ve II. yılda %100 fertigasyon uygulaması (16 kg/daN, 8 kg/da P, 20 kg/da K) sırasıyla 3386 kg/da ve 2927 kg/da ile kavun bitkisinin verimini en fazla artıran uygulama olmuştur. Ayrıca, I. yılda %100 fertigasyon uygulaması kavun bitkisinin N (%5.50), Zn (39.6 mg/kg) ve Mn (40.0 mg/kg) konsantrasyonlarına en fazla etkide bulunan uygulama olmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRBAŞ, A. (2017). Effects of Different Fertigation Levels on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Melon (Cucumis melo L.) Grown in the Central Anatolia Region. Alatarım, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 10–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/143471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Anonim, 2008. Tarımsal Üretim Verileri (http://faostat.fao.org). Anonim, 2017. https://sivas.tarim.gov.tr/Menu/32/Bitkise l-Uretim-Istatistikleri, Sivas İl Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Müdürlüğü. Bar-Yosef, B., 1999. Advances in Fertigation. Adv Agron 65:1–75.
  2. Bar-Yosef, B., 1991. Fertilization Under Drip Irrigtion. In: Fluid Fertilizer Science and Technology (Eds. Palgrave, Derek A., Marcel Dekker) Inc. New p. 285-329.
  3. Bhat, R., Sujatha, S., 2009. Soil Fertility and Nutrient Uptake by Arecanut (Areca catechu L.) as Affected by Level and Frequency of Fertigation in a Laterite Soil. Agricultural Water Management 96: 445-456.
  4. Bhat, R., Sujatha, S., Balasimha, D., 2007. Impact of Drip Fertigation on Productivity of arecanut (Areca catechu L.). Agricultural Water Management 90, 101-111.
  5. Bhella, H.S., 1985.
  6. Muskmelon Growth, Yield and Nutrition as Influenced by Planting Method and Trickle Irrigation. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science 110: 793–796.
  7. Bogle, C.R., Hartz, T.K., 1986. Comparison of Drip and Furrow Irrigation for Muskmelon Production, HortScience, 21: 242-244.
  8. Bremner, J.M., 1965. Method of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Methods. American Society of Agronomy Inc. Madison, Wise S-1149-1178,
  9. USA. Clark, G.A., Stanley, C.D., Maynard, D.N., Hochmuth, G.J., Hanlon, E.A., Haman, D.Z., 1991.Water and Fertilizer Management of Microirrigated Fresh Market Tomatoes. Am.Soc Agric Eng 34: 429-435.
  10. Demirbas, A., 2017. The Effects of Different Fertigation Treatments on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Watermelon Plants Grown as Second Crop in Cukurova Region. The International Conference “Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture”, 26-28
  11. June, Bucharest, Romania. Demirbas, A., Akpinar, C., Coskan, A., Karakoy, T., 2017. Effects of Different Fertigation Levels On Maize Yield and Nutrient Uptake Under Semi-Arid Mediterranean Conditions. Infrastructure and Ecology of Rural Areas, 727-736. FAO, 2012. FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org.
  12. Günay, A., 1992. Özel Sebze Yetiştiriciliği (Cilt V), Ankara.
  13. Jiusheng, L., Yibin, M., Li, B., 2007. Field Evaluation of Fertigation Uniformity as Affected by Injector Type and Manufacturing Variability of Emitters. Irrigation Science 25: 117–125.
  14. Kirnak, H., Higgs, D., Kaya, C., Tas, I., 2005. Effects of Irrigation and Nitrogen Rates on Growth, Yield, and Quality of Muskmelon in Semiarid Regions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 28(4), 621-638.
  15. Kumar, M., Rajput, T.B.S., Patel, N., Sahoo, R.N., Varghese, C., 2