Journals / Alatarım / 2017 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Effects of Pollination on Fruit Set and Some Fruit Quality Properties of Navel Group Orange Cultivars

Göbekli Portakal Çeşitlerinde Tozlamanın Meyve Tutumu ve Bazı Meyve Kalite Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi

Journal
Alatarım
Pages
11–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In controlled-pollinaiton treatments, a thinner peel wasobtained than open-polinaiton and non pollination, but there was not any important significance interms of normal and abnormal seed numbers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study effects of open-pollination, non-pollination and controlled-pollination with Valenciapollen to fruit set and some fruit quality properties as fruit size, peel thickness and seed numbers onWashington Navel, Navelina avd Navelate oranges were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result, controlledpollination treatments had higher fruit set than non-pollinaiton in these three Navel oranges.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In controlled-pollinaiton treatments, a thinner peel wasobtained than open-polinaiton and non pollination, but there was not any important significance interms of normal and abnormal seed numbers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study effects of open-pollination, non-pollination and controlled-pollination with Valenciapollen to fruit set and some fruit quality properties as fruit size, peel thickness and seed numbers onWashington Navel, Navelina avd Navelate oranges were investigated. As a result, controlledpollination treatments had higher fruit set than non-pollinaiton in these three Navel oranges. Also, intwo cultivars except from Navelina, controlled-pollinaiton showed higher fruit set than openpolinaiton. However, the increase in fruit set caused to decrease in fruit bigness especially inWashington Navel and Navelina cultivars. In controlled-pollinaiton treatments, a thinner peel wasobtained than open-polinaiton and non pollination, but there was not any important significance interms of normal and abnormal seed numbers.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, Washington Navel, Navelina ve Navelate göbekli portakal çeşitlerinde serbesttozlanma, izolasyon ve Valencia çiçek tozlarıyla yapay tozlama uygulamalarının, meyve tutumuyanında meyve iriliği, kabuk kalınlığı ve tohum sayısı gibi kalite özellikleri üzerine etkileriincelenmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, denemeye alınan üç göbekli portakal çeşidinde de yapay tozlamauygulamalarında izolasyon uygulamalarına oranla daha yüksek meyve tutumu sağlanmıştır. Ayrıca,yapay tozlama uygulamalarında Navelina çeşidi dışındaki diğer iki çeşitte serbest tozlanmauygulamalarına oranla yine daha yüksek meyve tutma değerlerine ulaşılmıştır. Ancak, meyvetutumundaki bu artış, özelikle W. Navel ve Navelina çeşitlerinde meyve iriliğinin biraz azalmasınaneden olmuştur. Yapay tozlama uygulamalarında izolasyon ve serbest tozlanma uygulamalarına göredaha ince kabuklu meyveler elde edilirken, normal ve abortif tohum sayısı yönünden önemli birfarklılık bulunamamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABIYIK, Ş., ETİ, S., YILMAZ, B., SAĞIR, F. S. (2017). Effects of Pollination on Fruit Set and Some Fruit Quality Properties of Navel Group Orange Cultivars. Alatarım, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 11–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/143467

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anonim, 2016. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Bitkisel Üretim Veri Tabanları.http://www.tuik.gov.tr
  2. Atkins, E.L., 1963. Honeybees and Agriculture. California Citrograph. 49(2): 81-82.
  3. Chacoff, N.P., Aizen, M.A., 2007. Pollination Requirements of Pigmanted Grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) from Northwestern Argentina. Crop Science. 47(3): 1143-1150.
  4. Chao, C.C.T., 2005. Pollination Study of Mandarins and the Effect on Seediness and Fruit Size: Implications for Seedless Mandarin Production. Hortscience. 40(2): 362-365.
  5. Eti, S., 2015. Bitkilerde Üreme Biyolojisi Ders Notları. 62 s. (Yayınlanmamış). Eti, S., Stösser, R., 1988. Fruchtbarkeit der Mandarinensorte 'Clementine' (Citrus reticulata Blanco) I. Pollenqualität und Pollenwachstum. Die Gartenbauwissenschaft. 53(4):160- 166. Gambetta, G., Gravina, A., Fasiolo, C., Fornero, C., Galiger, S., Inzaurralde, C., Rey, F., 2013.
  6. Self-incompatibility, Parthenocarpy and Reduction of Seed Presence in 'Afourer' Mandarin. Scientia Horticulturae. 164: 183-188.
  7. Geraci, G., Reforgiato, G., De Pasquale, F., 1978. Pollen Tubes Penetration in Citrus styles. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture. 1: 58-59.
  8. Ibrahim, M., Abbasi, N.A. Rahman, H.U., Hussain, A., Hafız, I.A., 2011. Phenological Behaviour and Effect of Different Chemicals on Pre-harvest Fruit Drop of Sweet Orange cv. 'Salustiana'. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 43(1): 453-457.
  9. Iglesias, D.J., Cercos, M., Colmenero-Flores, J.M., Naranjo, M.A., Rios, G., Carrera, E., Ruiz- Rivero, O., Lliso, I., Morillon, R., Tadeo, F.R., Talon, M., 2007. Physiology of Citrus Fruiting. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology. 19(4): 333-362.
  10. Jackson, L.K., Sherman, W.B., Krezdorn, A.H., 1973. Megasporogenesis and Embryo-sac Development in Seedless Citrus Cultivar. Proceedings of the International Society of Citrculture. 1: 23-27.
  11. Krezdorn, A.H., 1970. Pollination Requiremnts of Citrus. Indispensable Pollinators. 127: 211- 218. Lance, J.H., Vincent, A.P., 1970. Cross-pollination Studies on the Washington Navel Orange. I. Influence on Set and Growth of Fruit. Agroplantae. 2(4): 121-126.
  12. Majda, S., Abdelhak, T., Abdelkader, B., Rachid, B., Hamid, B., 2015. Development of a Reliable and Reproducible Test for the Ovule Fertility Study of Some Mandarin Group Variety (Citrus reticulata) Through Manual and Open Pollination. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research. 6(12): 7837-7843.
  13. Mesejo, C., Yuste, R., Martinez-Fuentes, A., Reig, C., Iglesias, D.J., Primo-Millo, E., Agu