Journals / Causapedia / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Caused By Pregnancy

Gebeliğin Neden Olduğu Hemolitik Üremik Sendrom

Journal
Causapedia
Pages
86–89
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this case report, we aimed to present a patient with differential diagnosis of thrombocytopenia caused by pregnancy who developed hemolytic uremic syndrome which was treated effectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A 23-year-old female patient developed uterine atony after cesarean delivery at term.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Peripheral smear revealed 80% neutrophils, 2% monocytes, 18% lymphocytes, erythrocytes polychromasia, diffuse schistosist and 5 normoblast platelets per 100 cells.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this case report, we aimed to present a patient with differential diagnosis of thrombocytopenia caused by pregnancy who developed hemolytic uremic syndrome which was treated effectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A 23-year-old female patient developed uterine atony after cesarean delivery at term. Thrombocytopenia developed in the postoperative intensive care unit. Peripheral smear revealed 80% neutrophils, 2% monocytes, 18% lymphocytes, erythrocytes polychromasia, diffuse schistosist and 5 normoblast platelets per 100 cells. Diffuse intravascular coagulation, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome were considered. ADAMTS 13 activity level was measured. Her clotting values were normal and she had no clinical signs and symptoms for diffuse intravascular coagulation. When ADAMTS 13 activity level was greater than 10%, the patient was diagnosed as hemolytic uremic syndrome. As soon as the peripheral smear was read, plasmapheresis was started and plasmapheresis was performed 6 times and the patient was discharged with recovery. In this case report, we aimed to present a patient with differential diagnosis of thrombocytopenia caused by pregnancy who developed hemolytic uremic syndrome which was treated effectively.

Özet

Yirmi üç yaşında bayan hastada, miadında sezaryen doğum sonrası, uterin atoni gelişti. Postoperatif yoğun bakım ünitesine alınan hastada trombositopeni gelişti. Periferik yaymada %80 nötrofil, %2 monosit, %18 lenfosit, eritrositlerde polikromazi, yaygın şistozist ve 100 hücreye 5 adet normoblast trombosit görüldü. Hastada, yaygın damar içi pıhtılaşma, trombotik trombositopenik purpura veya hemolitik üremik sendrom gelişmiş olabileceği düşünüldü. Pıhtılaşma değerleri normal olan ve yaygın damar içi pıhtılaşmaya uygun klinik belirtileri olmayan hastanın ADAM-TS 13 aktivite düzeyi incelendi. ADAMTS 13 aktivite düzeyi %10 dan büyük olunca hastaya hemolitik üremik sendrom tanısı konuldu. Periferik yayması okunur okunmaz plazmafereze başlanan hastaya 6 kez plazmaferez yapıldı ve hasta şifa ile taburcu edildi. Biz, bu olgu sunumunda gebeliğin neden olduğu trombositopenilerin ayırıcı tanısını yaptığımız ve hemolitik üremik sendrom tanısı koyup tedavi ettiğimiz bir hastayı sunmayı amaçladık.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİRYAKİ, C., AKOL, Ü., YEKTAŞ, A. (2019). Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Caused By Pregnancy. Causapedia, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 86–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/143247

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Chakraverty R et al. The incidence and cause of coagulopathies in an intensive care population. Br J Haematol. 1996;93(2):460-3
  2. Matthews JH et al. Pregnancy-associated thrombocytopenia: definition, incidence and natural history. Acta Haematologica. 1990;84(1):24-9
  3. Sainio S et al. Maternal thrombocytopenia at term: a populationbased study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(9):744-9
  4. Verdy E et al. Longitudinal analysis of platelet count and volume in normal pregnancy. J Thromb Haemost. 1997;77(4):806-7
  5. Burrows RF, Kelton JG. Thrombocytopenia at delivery: a prospective survey of 6715 deliveries. Am Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162(3):731-4
  6. McCrae KR. Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2010;2010(1):397-402
  7. Shehata N, Burrows R, Kelton JG. Gestational thrombocytopenia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1999;42(2):327-34
  8. Carmichae DS, Medley DRK. Heparin in thromboticmicroangiopathy Lancet 1966;1:1421-4
  9. Ruggenenti P, Noris M, Remuzzi G. Thrombotic microangiopathy, hemolyticuremic syndrome, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Kidney Int. 2001;60(3):831-46
  10. Peyvandi F et al. ADAMTS-13 assays in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(4):631-40
  11. Han-MouTsai. Pathophysiology of thromboticthrombocytope-nicpurpura. Int J Hematol. 2010; 91(1):1–19
  12. Noris M, Mescia F, Remuzzi G. STEC-HUS, atypi-cal HUS and TTP are all diseases of complement activation. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012;8 (11):622-33
  13. Loirat C, Saland J, Bitzan M. Management of hemolyticuremic syndrome. Presse Med. 2012;41(3 Pt 2): e115-35
  14. Giménez Llort A et al. Hemolytic-uraemicsyndrome. A review of 58 cases. An Pediatr (Barc).2008;69(4):297-303
  15. Rees L. Atypical HUS: time to take stock of current guidelines and outcome measures? Pediatr Nephrol. 2013;28(5):675-7
  16. Ligth C et al. Successful plasma therapy for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome caused by factor H deficiency owing to a novel mutation in the complement cofactor protein domain 15. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005; 45: 415-21
  17. Loirat C, Noris M, Fremeaux-Bacchi V. Complement and the atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008;23:1957-72
  18. Loirat C et al. Plasmatherapy in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2010; 36:673-81
  19. Noris M et al. Relative role of genetic complement abnormalities in sporadic and familial aHUS and their impact on clinical phenotype. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Oct;5(10):1844-59.