SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Economics Research Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Exploring the Relationships between Environmental Uncertainty, Business Strategy and Management Control System on Firm Performance

MELEK EKER
SEMİH EKER
Pages
115–129
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of t-test, the firms with high performance tend to use differentiation strategy, management control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, differentiation strategy and management control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, cost leadership strategy and management control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, differentiation strategy and interactive control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, cost leadership strategy and diagnostic control system more than ones with low performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The subject of this study is the effects of three way interaction between environmental uncertainty, business strategy and management control system on firm performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data from 94 Turkish manufacturing company of 500 top class company is analyzed with the SPSS.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of t-test, the firms with high performance tend to use differentiation strategy, management control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, differentiation strategy and management control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, cost leadership strategy and management control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, differentiation strategy and interactive control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, cost leadership strategy and diagnostic control system more than ones with low performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The subject of this study is the effects of three way interaction between environmental uncertainty, business strategy and management control system on firm performance. The data from 94 Turkish manufacturing company of 500 top class company is analyzed with the SPSS. The results of multiple regression analysis indicate that higher differentiation strategy, management control system, the three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, differentiation strategy and management control system and the three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, differentiation strategy and interactive control system lead to higher firm performance. According to the results of t-test, the firms with high performance tend to use differentiation strategy, management control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, differentiation strategy and management control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, cost leadership strategy and management control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, differentiation strategy and interactive control system, three-way interaction between environmental uncertainty, cost leadership strategy and diagnostic control system more than ones with low performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKER, M., EKER, S. (2019). Exploring the Relationships between Environmental Uncertainty, Business Strategy and Management Control System on Firm Performance. Business and Economics Research Journal, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 115–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/143240

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abernathy, M. A., & Guthrie, C. H. (1994). An empirical assessment of the “fit” between strategy and management information system design. Accounting and Finance, 34, 49-66.
  2. Acquaah, M. (2013). Management control systems, business strategy and performance: A comparative analysis of family and non-family businesses in a transition economy in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4, 131–146.
  3. Acquaah, M., Adjei, M.C., & Mensa-Bonsu, I. F. (2008). Competitive strategy, environmental characteristics and performance in African emerging economies: Lessons from firms in Ghana. Journal of African Business, 9, 1, 93-120.
  4. Anthony, R.N., Dearden, J., & Bedford, N.M. (1989). Management control systems (Sixth Ed.), Irwin. Arachchilage, N. D. K., & Smith, M. (2013). The effects of the diagnostic and ınteractive use of management control systems on the strategy-performance relationship. JAMAR, 11, 1, 9-27.
  5. Auzair, M., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2005). The effect of service process type, business strategy and life-cycle stage on bureauctic MCS in service organizations. Management Accounting Research, 16, 399-421.
  6. Auzair, S. Md. (2011). The effect of business strategy and external environment on management control systems: A study of Malaysian hotels. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 13, 236-245.
  7. Baines, A., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2003). Antecedents to management accounting change: A structural equation approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 675–698.
  8. Bastian, E., & Muchlish, M. (2012). Perceived environment uncertainty, business strategy, performance measurement systems and organizational performance. International Congress on Interdisciplinary Business and Social Science, 2012, (Icıbsos 2012).
  9. Bouwens, J., & Abernethy, M. A. (2000). The consequences of customization on management accounting system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25, 3, 221-259.
  10. Çetindaş, A., & Çelik, M. (2017). İmalat işletmelerinin tedarikçi entegrasyonları ile lojistik performansları arasındaki ilişki üzerine çevresel belirsizliğin düzenleyici rolü. Toros Üniversitesi İİBF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4, 7, 131-145.
  11. Chenhall, R. H. (1997). Reliance on manufacturing performance measures, total quality management and organizational performance. Management Accounting Research, 8, 187-206.
  12. Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control system design within its organizational context: Finding from contingencybased research and directions for the futu