SavedAdd your journal

Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

The evaluation of acquired bone volume with onlay block grafting by dental volumetric tomography

Onley blok greftleme sonrası kazanılan kemik miktarının dental volumetrik tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi

MUAMMER ÇAĞRI BURDURLU
FATİH CABBAR
VOLKAN ÇAĞRI DAĞAŞAN
Sezer IŞIKSAÇAN
Pages
317–321
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In all patients, sufficient horizontal bone volumes were acquired for at least 4 mm diameter implant insertion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the acquired bone volume obtained from ramus or symphysis block grafts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method:This retrospective study was conducted on 15 patients with horizontal or combined alveolar bone defects.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In all patients, sufficient horizontal bone volumes were acquired for at least 4 mm diameter implant insertion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the acquired bone volume obtained from ramus or symphysis block grafts. Materials and Method:This retrospective study was conducted on 15 patients with horizontal or combined alveolar bone defects. They were treated by autogenous bone blocks harvested from the ramus or symphysis. Bone volumes were measured pre-op and post-op 6th month by dental volumetric tomography images respectively. The results were analyzed by Wilcoxon, Mann Whitney U and Pearson Correlation tests (p<0,05). Results: Post-op bone volume values are statistically higher than pre-op ones in female group (p=0,003). Acquired bone values of the ramus group is statistically higher than the symphysis group (p=0,002). Conclusion: In all patients, sufficient horizontal bone volumes were acquired for at least 4 mm diameter implant insertion.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda ramus veya simfizden alınan blok greftlerle kazanılan kemik miktarlarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Horizontal veya kombine alveolar defekti bulunan 15 hastanın radyolojik görüntüleri restrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Defektler ramus veya simfiz bölgesinden alınan otojen blok greftlerle ogmente edilmiştir. Pre-op ve post-op 6. ayda alınan dental volumetrik tomografi (DVT) görüntüleri ile kazanılan kemik miktarları değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar Wilcoxon, Mann Whitney U ve Pearson Korelasyon testleri ile değerlendirilmiştir (p<0,05). Bulgular: Kadın hastaların post-op kemik kalınlığı değerleri pre-op kemik kalınlığı değerlerinden istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bulunmuştur (p=0,003). Ramus grubunda kazanılan kemik miktarı simfiz grubundan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bulunmuştur (p=0,002). Sonuç: Tüm hastalarda en az 4 mm çapında implant yerleştirilebilecek yeterli horizontal kemik hacmi elde edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BURDURLU, M. Ç., CABBAR, F., DAĞAŞAN, V. Ç., IŞIKSAÇAN, S. (2019). The evaluation of acquired bone volume with onlay block grafting by dental volumetric tomography. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 317–321. https://ajindex.com/articles/143101

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 136-159
  2. Dolanmaz D, Esen A, Yıldırım G, İnan Ö. The use of au togeneous mandibular bone block grafts for reconstruction of alveolar defects. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2015; 5:71- 76
  3. Bernstein S, Cooke J, Fotek P, Wang HL. Vertical bone augmentation: Where are we now? Implant Dent. 2006; 15:218-219
  4. Idrontino G, Valente NA. Intraoral and extraoral autologous bone block graft techniques: A review of the recent literature. Int J Contemp Dent Med Rev. vol. 2016; Article ID: 030316, 2016. doi 10.15713/ins.ijcdmr.99
  5. Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 767-776
  6. Misch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 1993; 2:`158-167
  7. Marx RE. Clinical application of bone biology to mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1994; 21: 377-392
  8. Fakhry A. The mandibular retromolar area as a donor site in maxillofacial bone grafting: surgical notes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011; 31: 275-283
  9. Acocella A, Bertolai R, Colafranceschi M, Sacco R. Clinical, histological and histomorphometric evaluation of the healing of mandibular ramus bone block grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation before implant placement. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg 2010; 38: 222-230
  10. Raghoebar GM, Meijndert L, Kalk WWI, Vissink A. Morbidity of mandibular bone harvesting: a comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 2007; 22: 359-365
  11. Gapski R, Wang HL, Misch CE. Management of incision design in symphysis graft procedures: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol 2001; 27: 134-142
  12. Cranin AN, Katzap M, Demirdjan E, Ley J. Autogenous bone ridge augmentation using the mandibular symphysis as a donor. J Oral Implantol 2004; 27: 43-47
  13. Sennerby L, Janson T, Warfvinge J, Carlsson G-E, Bergman B. Mandibular bone resorption in patients treated with tissue-integrated prostheses and in denture wearers. Prelim Manuscr 1988; 46: 135-140
  14. Siebert JW, Angrigiani C, McCarthy JG, Longaker MT. Blood supply of the Le Fort I maxillary segment: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100: 843-851
  15. Dilek O, Tezulas E, Dincel M. Required minimum primary stability and torque values for immediate loading of mini dental implants: an experimental study in