Journals / Anadolu / 2016 / Sayı: 42

THE PERSONAL ORNAMENTS OF DİREKLİ CAVE IN THE LIGHT OF THE EPIPALAEOLITHIC OF ANATOLIA AND THE LEVANT

ANADOLU VE LEVANT EPİ-PALEOLİTİĞİ IŞIĞINDA DİREKLİ MAĞARASI KİŞİSEL SÜS EŞYALARI

Journal
Anadolu
Pages
137–154
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion the article considers how the Direkli assemblage fits into a wider regional perspective on Epipalaeolithic ornamentation practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Personal ornaments have become one of the characteristic artefact types associated with the Epipalaeolithic period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the Levant marine shell beads were commonly used in large numbers in the Epipalaeolithic and transported long distances from their coastal sources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion the article considers how the Direkli assemblage fits into a wider regional perspective on Epipalaeolithic ornamentation practices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Personal ornaments have become one of the characteristic artefact types associated with the Epipalaeolithic period. In the Levant marine shell beads were commonly used in large numbers in the Epipalaeolithic and transported long distances from their coastal sources. Stone beads also became more common in this period and different forms and colours were employed. New evidence from Direkli Cave in Kahramanmaraş province, southeast Turkey, shows that, as in the Levantine examples, marine shells and stone were used to make beads in the Epipalaeolithic period. This article discusses the new evidence of bead use from Direkli Cave. In addition to presenting the bead assemblage from the site it also considers the relationship of these ornaments to those that have been recovered in adjacent regions, taking into account evidence from the Levant and Central Anatolia. In conclusion the article considers how the Direkli assemblage fits into a wider regional perspective on Epipalaeolithic ornamentation practices.

Özet

Bireysel takı ve süs eşyaları, Epi-paleolitik Dönem ile birlikte karakteristik buluntu şeklini almaya başlamıştır. Levant Epi-paleolitiği sürecinde deniz kabukları çok sayıda ve yaygın olarak kullanılmış olup, bulunmuş oldukları kıyılardan çok daha uzak mesafelere taşınmışlardır. Aynı dönemde, taş boncuklar da yaygınlaşıp farklı form ve renklerde görülmeye başlarlar. Türkiye'nin Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi'nde ki Kahramanmaraş ilinde bulunan Direkli Mağarası'ndan gelen yeni bulgular gösteriyor ki, Levant Bölgesi'nde olduğu gibi burada da Epi-paleolitik Dönem'de deniz kabukları ve taşlar boncuk yapımında kullanılmıştır. Bu makale, Direkli Mağarası'ndan gelen yeni bulguları boncuk kullanımı ekseninde tartışmaktadır. Ayrıca, kazı çalışmaları sonucunda yerleşmede bulunan boncukların sunumu ve söz konusu buluntu grubunun Levant ve Orta Anadolu gibi yakın çevrede ele geçen ve süs eşyası olarak tanımlanan diğer buluntular ile olan ilişkilerini de değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma, Direkli Mağarası buluntularının geniş bir alanda Epi-paleolitik Dönem süs eşyası kullanım pratiklerine uygunluğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYSAL, E. L. (2016). THE PERSONAL ORNAMENTS OF DİREKLİ CAVE IN THE LIGHT OF THE EPIPALAEOLITHIC OF ANATOLIA AND THE LEVANT. Anadolu, Sayı: 42, 137–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/142995

References (2)

  1. Alarashi 2014
  2. H. Alarashi, La parure épipaléolithique et néolithique de la Syrie (12e au 7e millénaire avant J.-C.): techniques et usages, échanges et identités. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (Lyon 2014). Albrecht ve diğ. 1992 G. Albrecht - B. Albrecht - H. Berke - D. Burger - J. Moser - W. Rähle - W. Schoch - G. Storch - H. P. Uerpmann - B. Urban, "Late Pleistocene and early Holocene finds from Öküzini: a contribution to the settlement history of the Bay of Antalya, Turkey", Paléorient 18.2, 1992, 123-141. Amr - Abu Baker 2004 Z. S. Amr - M. Abu Baker, "Freshwater snails of Jordan", Denisia 14, zugleich Kataloge der OÖ. Landesmuseen Neue Serie 2 (2004) 221-227. Arbuckle - Erek 2010 B. Arbuckle - C. M. Erek, "Late Epipalaeolithic hunters of the central Taurus: faunal remains from Direkli Cave, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey", International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 22.6, 2010, 694-707. Baird 2012 D. Baird, "Pınarbaşı. From Epipalaeolithic campsite to sedentarising village in central Anatolia", içinde: M. Özdogan - N. Başgelen - P. Kuniholm (Eds.), The Neolithic in Turkey, vol. 3 (Istanbul 2012) 181-218. Baird ve diğ. 2013 D. Baird - E. Asouti - L. Astruc - A. Baysal - E. Baysal - D. Carruthers - A. Fairbairn - C. Kabukcu - E. Jenkins - K. Lorentz - C. Middleton - J. Pearson - A. Pirie, "Juniper smoke, skulls and wolves' tails. The Epipalaeolithic of the Anatolian Plateau in SW Asian context; insights from Pınarbaşı", Levant 45.2, 2013, 175-209. Bar-Yosef 1991 D. Bar-Yosef, "Changes in the selection of marine shells from the Natufian to the Neolithic", in: O. Bar-Yosef - F. Valla (Eds.), The Natufian Culture in the Levant (Michigan 1991) 629-636. Bar-Yosef Mayer 2005a D. Bar-Yosef, "The exploitation of shells as beads in the Palaeolithic and Neolithic of the Levant", Paléorient 31.1, 2005, 176-185. Bar-Yosef Mayer 2005b D. Bar-Yosef Mayer (Ed.), Archaeomalacology: Molluscs in former environments of human behavior (Oxford 2005). Bar-Yosef Mayer 2008 D. Bar-Yosef Mayer, "Dentalium shells used by hunter-gatherers and pastoralists in the Levant", Archaeofauna 17, 2008, 103-110. Bar-Yosef Mayer 2013 D. Bar-Yosef Mayer, "Towards and typology of stone beads in the Neolithic Levant", JFA 38.2, 2013, 129-142. Bar-Yosef Mayer ve diğ. 2010 D. Bar-Yosef Mayer - B. Gümüş - Y. İslamoğlu, "Fossil hunting in the Neolithic: Shells from the Taurus Mountains at Çatalhöyük, Turkey", Geoarchaeology 25.3, 2010, 375-392.? Bar-Yosef Mayer - Porat 2008D. Bar-Yose