Journals / Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Effect of Swirl Plates on Volumetric Discharge Rate and Spray Characteristics of Hollow Cone Nozzles

Pages
103–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was estimated that the droplet diameter in the range of 2-12 bar in the hollow cone nozzles varied between 76,3-219,0 µm and it was determined that mostly very fine and partially fine and medium sized droplets were produced.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to determine the effect of orifice diameter, swirl plate and spray pressure on the volumetric flow, discharge coefficient and some spray characteristics of hollow cone nozzles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the trials, five nozzle discs with 1,0, 1,2, 1,6, 2,0 and 2,4 millimetres orifice diameters and three polyacetal materials with 2 or 3 slots and one stainless steel with 2-slots swirl plate were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was estimated that the droplet diameter in the range of 2-12 bar in the hollow cone nozzles varied between 76,3-219,0 µm and it was determined that mostly very fine and partially fine and medium sized droplets were produced.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of the study is to determine the effect of orifice diameter, swirl plate and spray pressure on the volumetric flow, discharge coefficient and some spray characteristics of hollow cone nozzles. In the trials, five nozzle discs with 1,0, 1,2, 1,6, 2,0 and 2,4 millimetres orifice diameters and three polyacetal materials with 2 or 3 slots and one stainless steel with 2-slots swirl plate were used. Spray application were made at spray pressures of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 bar. The highest discharge rate at constant pressure was obtained with stainless steel and the lowest blue swirl plates. Although the number of slots was different, the effect of brown and yellow swirl plates on volumetric discharge rate variation was statistically insignificant. The discharge coefficient decreased as the diameter of the nozzle orifice increased. Accordingly, the average discharge coefficient for the 1,0 mm, 1,2, 1,6, 2,0 and 2,4 mm diameter nozzle discs was 0,411, 0,362, 0,285, 0,236 and 0.201, respectively. It was estimated that the droplet diameter in the range of 2-12 bar in the hollow cone nozzles varied between 76,3-219,0 µm and it was determined that mostly very fine and partially fine and medium sized droplets were produced.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYINCI, B., ÇÖMLEK, R., DEMİR, B., ÇOMAKLI, M. (2019). Effect of Swirl Plates on Volumetric Discharge Rate and Spray Characteristics of Hollow Cone Nozzles. Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 103–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/142962

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Albuz®, 2009. Disc&Core Ceramic Hollow-Cone Nozzle Catalogue. http://albuz-spray.com (Available from: October 2009) Arag®, 2017.
  2. Nozzle Holder, Caps and Nozzle Tips Catalogue (Revision). www.aragnet.com (Available from: November 2017) Arag®, 2004.
  3. Nozzle Holder, Caps and Nozzle Tips Catalogue. www.aragnet.it (Available from: October 2004) ASABE, 2009. Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra. Standard 572.1 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI Ballester, J. and Dopazo C., 1994. Discharge coefficient and spray angle measurements for small pressure-swirl nozzles. Atomization and Sprays 4: 351-367
  4. Bayat, A. and Bozdogan, N. Y., 2005. An air-assisted spinning disc nozzle and its performance on spray deposition and reduction of drift potential. Crop Protection 24: 651- 960 Bode, L. E., Butler, B. J., Pearson, S. L. and Bouse, L. F., 1983. Characteristics of the micromax rotary atomizer. Transactions of the ASAE 24(4): 999-1004
  5. Chu, C. C., Chou, S. F., Lin, H. I. and Liann, Y. H., 2008. An experimental investigation of swirl atomizer sprays. Heat and Mass Transfer 45: 11-12
  6. Cloeter, M. D., Qin, K., Patil, P. and Smith, B., 2010. Planar laser induced fluorescence (PLIF) flow visualization applied to agricultural spray nozzles with sheet disintegration: Influence of an oil-in-water emulsion. In Proc. ILASS-Americas 22nd Annual Conf. Institute for Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems. Retrieved from http://ilass.org/2/ConferencePapers/ILASS2010- 161.pdf Dorr, G. J., Hewitt, A. J., Adkins, S. W., Hanan, J., Zhang, H. and Noller, B., 2013. A comparison of initial spray characteristics produced by agricultural nozzles. Crop Protection 53: 109-117
  7. Dursun, E., Karahan, Y. and Çilingir, İ., 2000. Türkiye’de üretilen konik hüzmeli bazı meme plakalarında delik çapı ve düzgünlüğünün belirlenmesi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 6(3): 135-140
  8. Hipkins, P. and Grisso, R. B., 2014. Droplet Chart / Selection Guide. Virginia Cooperative Extention, Virginia State University, Publication 442-031
  9. Hussein, A., Hafiz, M., Rahid, H., Halim, A., Wisnoe, W. and Kasolang, S., 2012. Characteristics of hollow cone swirl spray at various nozzle orifice diameters. Jurnal Teknologi 58: 1-4 Hypro®, 2014. Hypro Nozzle Catalogue. http://www.hyproeu.com (Available from: October 2014). Hypro®, 2017. Hypro® Nozzles, Crop Spraying Pocket Guide 2017-18. http://www.hypro-eu.com (Available from: October 2017) Hypropumps, 2006. SprayTip Catalog. www.hypropumps.com (Avai