SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Veterinaria Eurasia / 2019 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

The Investigation of the Presence and Antimicrobial Profiles of Arcobacter Species in Sheep Carcasses and Feces

CANSU ÇELİK
Serkan İKİZ
Pages
42–49
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, it should be considered that arcobacters have started to gain resistance against fluoroquinolones.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was designed to investigate the presence and the prevalence of Arcobacter butzleri, Arcobacter cryaerophilus, and Arcobacter skirrowii in sheep carcass swabs and feces from sheep with and without diarrhea raised in Istanbul.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 50 fecal samples from sheep without diarrhea, 50 fecal samples from sheep with diarrhea, and 50 carcass swab samples from sheep were the material of this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, it should be considered that arcobacters have started to gain resistance against fluoroquinolones.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:150 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study was designed to investigate the presence and the prevalence of Arcobacter butzleri, Arcobacter cryaerophilus, and Arcobacter skirrowii in sheep carcass swabs and feces from sheep with and without diarrhea raised in Istanbul. Also it was aimed to determine their resistance profiles against some antimicrobials. For this purpose, 50 fecal samples from sheep without diarrhea, 50 fecal samples from sheep with diarrhea, and 50 carcass swab samples from sheep were the material of this study. Arcobacter spp. were isolated from 49 (32.6%) of total 150 samples. 34 samples (68%) of 50 fecal samples from sheep with diarrhea, 5 samples (10%) from 50 fecal samples of sheep without diarrhea and 10 samples (20%) of 50 sheep carcass swabs were found to be positive according to isolation results. According to multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (mPCR) results, 31 of 49 were identified as A. skirrowii (63.3%), 9 of 49 were A. butzleri (18.3%), while 9 of 49 were A. cryaerophilus (18.3%). As a conclusion, Arcobacter species should be taken into consideration especially in sheep with diarrhea. Additionally, it should be considered that arcobacters have started to gain resistance against fluoroquinolones.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, C., İKİZ, S. (2019). The Investigation of the Presence and Antimicrobial Profiles of Arcobacter Species in Sheep Carcasses and Feces. Acta Veterinaria Eurasia, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 42–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/142917

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Abay S., Kayman T., Hizlisoy H., Aydin F., 2012. In vitro antibacterial susceptibility of Arcobacter butzleri isolated from different sources. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 74, 613-616. [CrossRef] Aski H.S., Tabatabaei M., Khoshbakht R., Raeisi M., 2016. Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of emergent Arcobacter spp. isolated from cattle and sheep in Iran. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 44, 37-40. [CrossRef] Assanta M.A., Roy D., Lemay M.J., Montpetit D., 2002. Attachment of Arcobacter butzleri, a new waterborne pathogen, to water distribution pipe surfaces. Journal of Food Protection 65, 1240-1247. [CrossRef] Atabay H.I., Corry, J.E., 1998. Evaluation of a new arcobacter enrichment medium and comparison with two media developed for enrichment of Campylobacter spp. International Journal of Food Microbiology 41, 53-58. [CrossRef] Cardoen S., Van Huffel X., Berkvens D., Quoilin S., Ducoffre G., Saegerman C., Speybroeck N., Imberechts H., Herman L., Ducatelle R., Dierick K., 2009. Evidence-based semiquantitative methodology for prioritization of foodborne zoonoses. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 6, 1083-1095. [CrossRef] Collado L., Figueras M.J., 2011. Taxonomy, epidemiology and clinical relevance of the genus Arcobacter. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 24, 174-192. [CrossRef] Ertaș N., Doğruer Y., 2009. Prevalence of Arcobacter species in ground meat from cattle and sheep using multiplex PCR techniques. Fırat University Medical Journal of Health Sciences 23, 95-100. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 2015. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for Interpretation of MICs and zone diameters,Version 5.0 Fernandez H., Villanueva M.P., Mansilla I., Gonzalez M., Latif F., 2015. Arcobacter butzleri and A. cryaerophilus in human, animals and food sources, in southern Chile. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 46, 145-147. [CrossRef] Golla S.C., Murano E.A., Johnson L.G., Tipton N.C., Cureington E.A., Savell J.W., 2002. Determination of the occurrence of Arcobacter butzleri in beef and dairy cattle from Texas by various isolation methods. Journal of Food Protection 65, 1849-1853. [CrossRef] Grove-White D.H., Leatherbarrow A.J.H., Cripps P.J., Diggle P.J., French N.P., 2014. Temporal and farm-management-associated variation in faecal pat prevalence of Arcobacter spp. in ruminants. Epidemiology & Infection 142, 861-870. [CrossRef] Houf K., Devriese L.A., De Zutter L