Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 5

Pollutant measurements at near road and urban background sites in NewYork, USA

Pages
859–870
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nonparametric wind regression identified the roadways as the major source oftraffic related air pollutants.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Due to the potential for heightened exposure to vehicle exhaust pollutants, air monitoring has been required atnear roadway (NR) locations within large urban centers in the United States since 2010.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pollutantsmeasured at these sites include PM2.5mass, nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2,NOx), ultrafine particles (UFP), blackcarbon (BC) and carbon monoxide (CO).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nonparametric wind regression identified the roadways as the major source oftraffic related air pollutants.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Due to the potential for heightened exposure to vehicle exhaust pollutants, air monitoring has been required atnear roadway (NR) locations within large urban centers in the United States since 2010. In this paper pollutantmeasurements at two urban NR locations, Rochester and New York City, Queens are discussed. Pollutantsmeasured at these sites include PM2.5mass, nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2,NOx), ultrafine particles (UFP), blackcarbon (BC) and carbon monoxide (CO). Measurements at NR sites are made in conjunction with existing urbanbackground (UB) sites. Although pollutant concentrations at Rochester and Queens are elevated at the NR sitescompared to the UB sites particularly during the daytime hours, all pollutants are below the level of the NationalAmbient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). At Rochester, BC at the NR site is elevated by a factor of 2–3 between 7a.m. and 3 p.m. and drops to near uniform concentrations at both sites at night. The enhancement or incrementin BC is highest in summer and lowest in winter. Other co-pollutants including NOxand CO are also elevated atthe Rochester NR site by varying degrees during daytime hours. Similarly, enhanced pollutant concentrations areobserved at the Queens NR site. At both locations small increments are observed for PM2.5mass. For example, anannual increment of 0.27μg/m3and a daily increment of 0.80μg/m3was observed at the Rochester NR site. AtQueens NR annual PM2.5mass increments of 0.92 and 1.0μg/m3were observed in 2017 and 2018. In addition, aNR daily increment of 1.4μg/m3was observed at Queens in 2018. The data are analyzed for diurnal, weekday vsweekend and seasonal patterns. Nonparametric wind regression identified the roadways as the major source oftraffic related air pollutants.

🔖

Cite This Article

RATTİGAN, O., CARPENTER, A., CİVEROLO, K., FELTON, H. (2020). Pollutant measurements at near road and urban background sites in NewYork, USA. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 5, 859–870. https://ajindex.com/articles/142851

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Canagaratna, M.R., Onasch, T.B., Wood, E.C., Herndon, S.C., Jayne, J.T., Cross, E.S.,Miake-Lye, R.C., Kolb, C.E., Worsnop, D.R., 2010. Evolution of vehicle exhaust par-ticles in the atmosphere. J. Air & Waste Manag. 60, 1192–1203.
  2. Civerolo, K.L., Rattigan, O.V., Felton, H.D., Schwab, J.J., 2017. Changes in gas-phase airpollutants across New York state, USA. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 17, 147–166.https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.04.0141.
  3. DeWinter, J.L., Brown, S.G., Seagram, A.F., Landsberg, K., Eisinger, D.S., 2018. A na-tional-scale review of air pollutant concentrations measured in the U.S. near-roadmonitoring network during 2014 and 2015. Atmos. Environ. 183, 94–105.
  4. Drinovec, L., Mocnik, G., Zotter, P., Prevot, A.S.H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M.,Sciare, J., Muller, T., Wiedensohler, A., Hansen, A.D.A., 2015. The“dual-spot”Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-timeloading compensation. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8, 1965–1979.
  5. Durant, J.L., Ash, C.A., Wood, E.C., Herndon, S.C., Jayne, J.T., Knighton, W.B.,Canagaratna, M.R., Trull, J.B., Brugge, D., Zamore, W., Kolb, C.E., 2010. Short-termvariation in near-highway air pollutant gradients on a winter morning. Atmos. Chem.Phys. 10, 8341–8352.
  6. Esworthy, R., 2015. Air quality: EPA's 2013 changes to the particulate matter (PM)standard. Congressional Research Service Report.https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42934.pdf7–5700.
  7. Fan, H., Zhao, C., Yang, Y., 2020. A comprehensive analysis of the spatio-temporal var-iation of urban air pollution in China during 2014–2018,Atmos. Environ. Times 220,117066.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117066.
  8. Ganguly, R., Sharma, D., Kumar, P., 2019. Trend analysis of observational PM10 concentrations in Shimla city, India. 51 Sustainable Cities and Society Article ID:101719, C. Ginzburg, H., Liu, X., Baker, M., Shreeve, R., Jayanty, R.K.M., Campbell, D., Zielinska, B.,2015. Monitoring study of the near-road PM2.5 concentrations in Maryland. J. Air &Waste Manag. 65, 1062–1071.
  9. Hansen, A.D.A., Rosen, H., Novakov, T., 1984. The Aethalometer -An instrument for thereal-time measurement of optical absorption by aerosol particles. Sci. Total Environ.36, 191–196.
  10. Health Effects Institute, HEI, 2010. Traffic-related air pollution: a critical review of theliterature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. Report Prepared by the HealthEffects Institute, Boston, MA. Special Report 17, January. Available at:https://www.healtheffects.org/system/files/SR17T